FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3093676830> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3093676830 endingPage "136" @default.
• W3093676830 startingPage "127" @default.
• W3093676830 abstract "Objective: To determine the outcome of antibiotic treatment regime in patient with indwelling DJ stenting having a per-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis compared with those of a continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment.&#x0D; Methods: A hospital based prospective experimental study was conducted in the Department of Urology of Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka from July 2012 to June 2014, to evaluate the antibiotic treatment regime in patient with indwelling DJ stenting, the benefits and disadvantages of a peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis compared with those of a continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment by enrolling a total number of 60 subjects in the department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. Among 60 subjects 30 subjects were Group A comprised of subjects treated with continuous low dose antibiotic and Group B with 30 subjects treated with peri-interventional antibiotic. The patients would undergo temporary D J stent placement due to upper tract urolilhiasis who meet the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Informed written consent would be taken from all patients. Urine samples would be analysed conventional antibiotic susceptibility and resistance was determined. All analyses was conducted at department of Microbiology, Dhaka medical college hospital. All patients who received peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis with 1g ceftriaxon was given l.v. at anaesthesia induction to obtain a peak concentration at the time of highest risk during the procedure.According to the pathogens profile and susceptibility, the antimicrobial agent of choice for continuous low-dose treatment was Cefixim 200mg twice daily. All stents placements were performed under sterile conditions applying a retrograde technique or antregrade in PCNL and open procedure under spinal or general anaesthesia. Patients were prescribed ketorolac (10mg) or Tramadol (50mg), while none of the patient received alpha blocker agents or anti-cholinergic drugs. Evaluations for UTI were performed before stent insertion and consecutively after 1, 2 and 4 weeks and/or at stent withdrawal. Statistical analysis of the result was obtained by using window based computer software devised with statistical packages for social science (SPSS-20 IBM) (SPSS inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The result was presented in tables, figures, and diagrams. Statistical test was done by Chi square test and Z test for qualitative data and t test for quantitative data. A p-value <0.05 is considered as level of significance.&#x0D; Results: To evaluate the antibiotic treatment regime in patient with indwelling DJ stenting, the benefits and disadvantages of a peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis compared with those of a continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment, a total number of 60 subjects were enrolled in this present study in the department of Urology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. Among 60 subjects 30 subjects were Group A comprised of subjects treated with continuous low dose antibiotic and Group B with 30 subjects treated with periinterventional antibiotic only. Outcome of these two treatment techniques were studied. For urinary tract infection rate the concept of a peri-interventional antibiotic prophylaxis during DJ stent implantation is known to be better antibiotic coverage and is therefore recommended by the European Association of Urology. However, there is a lack of evidence concerning the exact antibiotic strategy for the entire stent-indwelling time. In clinical routine, it is an applied practice among urologists to continue antibiotic treatment in a low-dose fashion, even after previous uncomplicated implantations.&#x0D; Conclusion: In case of indwelling DJ stenting, subjects with continuous low dose antibiotic regimen had significantly less proportion of UTI, dysuria and frequency of micturition than those with peri-interventional antibiotic. So, if haematuria, skin rash and GIT disturbance is carefully managed then continuous low dose antibiotic regimen is better treatment option than peri-interventional regimen for with indwelling DJ stenting in different cases.&#x0D; Bangladesh Journal of Urology, Vol. 21, No. 2, July 2018 p.127-136" @default.
• W3093676830 created "2020-10-29" @default.
• W3093676830 creator A5002002340 @default.
• W3093676830 creator A5036397889 @default.
• W3093676830 creator A5044879034 @default.
• W3093676830 creator A5058357460 @default.
• W3093676830 creator A5085989309 @default.
• W3093676830 creator A5091751497 @default.
• W3093676830 date "2020-10-21" @default.
• W3093676830 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3093676830 title "Outcome of Continuous Low Dose Antibiotic Treatment in Comparison With Periintervention Antibiotic Prophylaxsis in Double J Stenting" @default.
• W3093676830 doi "https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v21i2.49884" @default.
• W3093676830 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3093676830 type Work @default.
• W3093676830 sameAs 3093676830 @default.
• W3093676830 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3093676830 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3093676830 hasAuthorship W3093676830A5002002340 @default.
• W3093676830 hasAuthorship W3093676830A5036397889 @default.
• W3093676830 hasAuthorship W3093676830A5044879034 @default.
• W3093676830 hasAuthorship W3093676830A5058357460 @default.
• W3093676830 hasAuthorship W3093676830A5085989309 @default.
• W3093676830 hasAuthorship W3093676830A5091751497 @default.
• W3093676830 hasBestOaLocation W30936768301 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C2777596629 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C2778602436 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConcept C94665300 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C126322002 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C141071460 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C142724271 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C204787440 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C2777596629 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C2778583881 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C2778602436 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C501593827 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C71924100 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C86803240 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C89423630 @default.
• W3093676830 hasConceptScore W3093676830C94665300 @default.
• W3093676830 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3093676830 hasLocation W30936768301 @default.
• W3093676830 hasOpenAccess W3093676830 @default.
• W3093676830 hasPrimaryLocation W30936768301 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W1499664437 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W1996268075 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W2003172002 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W2044828494 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W2159001412 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W2195581486 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W2274212671 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W2764189738 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W3042614407 @default.
• W3093676830 hasRelatedWork W4214858269 @default.
• W3093676830 hasVolume "21" @default.
• W3093676830 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3093676830 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3093676830 magId "3093676830" @default.
• W3093676830 workType "article" @default.