FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3093965781> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3093965781 endingPage "667" @default.
• W3093965781 startingPage "656" @default.
• W3093965781 abstract "ObjectiveTo evaluate the fertility outcomes of salpingectomy compared with those of salpingostomy among patients treated for tubal ectopic pregnancies, including a separate analysis of women with risk factors along with a review of the surgical technique.Data SourcesSystematic review and meta-analysis from 1990 to the present through PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Ovid MEDLINE. The search string included “tubal pregnancy” or “ectopic” as well as “salpingectomy” and various terms describing salpingotomy.Methods of Study SelectionArticles studying women who underwent surgical management of an ectopic pregnancy and the contrasted outcomes of salpingectomy vs salpingostomy were reviewed. The primary outcomes included subsequent intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) and repeat ectopic pregnancy (REP).Tabulation, Integration, and ResultsTwo randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which consisted mostly of patients classified as low risk, and patients from 16 cohort studies were included. In the RCTs, there was no significant difference in the odds of subsequent IUP in patients who underwent a salpingectomy compared with those who were treated with salpingotomy (odds ratio [OR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71–1.33). However, a significant and clinically meaningful difference was noted in the cohort studies, with the patients having a lower chance of IUP after salpingectomy (OR 0.45; 95% CI, 0.39–0.52). No significant difference was noted in the OR for a REP in the randomized trials (OR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.41–1.47), but the patients followed in the cohort studies had a cumulatively higher risk of REP after a salpingostomy (OR 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60–0.90).The subgroup analysis examining women within the studies with risk factors for tubal pathology found an even more impressive lowering in the odds of a subsequent IUP in patients classified as at-risk who were treated with salpingectomy (OR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.17–0.54), with a change in the direction of the odds for an REP rate favoring those who were treated with salpingostomy (OR 1.96; 95% CI, 0.88–4.35).ConclusionSalpingectomy has clear advantages over salpingostomy, and RCTs consisting mainly of patients classified as low risk show no difference in outcomes between salpingectomy and salpingostomy. However, in cohort studies inclusive of all patients, the likelihood of a subsequent spontaneous IUP is decreased in patients treated with salpingectomy, and salpingostomies may be especially underused in women with risk factors for tubal disease." @default.
• W3093965781 created "2020-10-29" @default.
• W3093965781 creator A5006159560 @default.
• W3093965781 creator A5073206214 @default.
• W3093965781 creator A5077538089 @default.
• W3093965781 date "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3093965781 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W3093965781 title "A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Surgical Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy with Salpingectomy versus Salpingostomy" @default.
• W3093965781 cites W1968557239 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W1989740103 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W1989941488 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W1996538724 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W1997772313 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2005623025 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2013082740 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2013734125 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2016808331 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2021225680 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2025861457 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2026276118 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2032108133 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2040239690 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2046810917 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2052920716 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2056628223 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2057517589 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2074727268 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2086121783 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2090986965 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2096689316 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2099003094 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2118012601 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2124633325 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2134980897 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2135069378 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2139863496 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2140780924 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2149737399 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2149860969 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2171390106 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2195293985 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2221355334 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2307741907 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2322379120 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2335268304 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2394849321 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2518911389 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2594395949 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2756709534 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2796594786 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W2991085372 @default.
• W3093965781 cites W4248434990 @default.
• W3093965781 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.10.014" @default.
• W3093965781 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33198948" @default.
• W3093965781 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3093965781 type Work @default.
• W3093965781 sameAs 3093965781 @default.
• W3093965781 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W3093965781 countsByYear W30939657812021 @default.
• W3093965781 countsByYear W30939657812022 @default.
• W3093965781 countsByYear W30939657812023 @default.
• W3093965781 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3093965781 hasAuthorship W3093965781A5006159560 @default.
• W3093965781 hasAuthorship W3093965781A5073206214 @default.
• W3093965781 hasAuthorship W3093965781A5077538089 @default.
• W3093965781 hasBestOaLocation W30939657811 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C201903717 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C2776018949 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C2780164438 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C2909184456 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C126322002 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C131872663 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C141071460 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C156957248 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C168563851 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C201903717 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C2776018949 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C2779234561 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C2780164438 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C2909184456 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C29456083 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C44249647 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C54355233 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C71924100 @default.
• W3093965781 hasConceptScore W3093965781C86803240 @default.

• next