FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3094354181> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3094354181 endingPage "2145" @default.
• W3094354181 startingPage "2138" @default.
• W3094354181 abstract "BACKGROUND: Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy are second-line imaging techniques that are frequently used for the evaluation of patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. However, as a result of varying diagnostic performance results, no true reference standard exists for scaphoid fracture diagnosis. We hypothesized that the use of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture could improve scaphoid fracture detection compared with conventional CT in the clinical setting. METHODS: The present study included 91 consecutive patients (≥18 years of age) who presented to the emergency department with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture between December 2017 and October 2018. All patients were clinically reassessed within 14 days after first presentation, followed by CT and HR-pQCT. If a scaphoid fracture was present, the fracture type was determined according to the Herbert classification system and correlation between CT and HR-pQCT was estimated with use of the Kendall W statistic or coefficient of concordance (W) (the closer to 1, the higher the correlation). RESULTS: The cohort included 45 men and 46 women with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range, 29 to 67 years). HR-pQCT revealed a scaphoid fracture in 24 patients (26%), whereas CT revealed a scaphoid fracture in 15 patients (16%). Patients with a scaphoid fracture were younger and more often male. The correlation between CT and HR-pQCT was high for scaphoid fracture type according to the Herbert classification system (W = 0.793; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.91; p < 0.001) and very high for scaphoid fracture location (W = 0.955; 95%, CI 0.90 to 0.98; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the number of patients diagnosed with a scaphoid fracture was 60% higher when using HR-pQCT as compared with CT. These findings imply that a substantial proportion of fractures-in this study, more than one-third-will be missed by the current application of CT scanning in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence." @default.
• W3094354181 created "2020-10-29" @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5014634635 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5015507525 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5032185441 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5044072525 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5049731825 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5054434839 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5056671698 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5057271492 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5063425056 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5066783609 @default.
• W3094354181 creator A5070876327 @default.
• W3094354181 date "2020-10-20" @default.
• W3094354181 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3094354181 title "Improved Detection of Scaphoid Fractures with High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT Compared with Conventional CT" @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1803711505 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1966609163 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1974334673 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1978522025 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1979576249 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1979787008 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1997316634 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W1997863544 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2011416167 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2014999512 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2018961956 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2029676581 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2031390339 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2035524995 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2061049789 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2072120617 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2075763627 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2087479654 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2091302682 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2094470919 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2105510043 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2109372280 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2114525962 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2117369607 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2126511714 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2131108685 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2132908320 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2136894659 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2137328549 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2139587725 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2140134708 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2140384494 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2140459001 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2148675520 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2150879210 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2168218454 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2178206469 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2205916493 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2234507530 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2292212342 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2323792914 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2419150988 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2612127581 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W2726981249 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W27928296 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W3013819809 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W4253690501 @default.
• W3094354181 cites W68358262 @default.
• W3094354181 doi "https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.20.00124" @default.
• W3094354181 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33079896" @default.
• W3094354181 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3094354181 type Work @default.
• W3094354181 sameAs 3094354181 @default.
• W3094354181 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W3094354181 countsByYear W30943541812021 @default.
• W3094354181 countsByYear W30943541812022 @default.
• W3094354181 countsByYear W30943541812023 @default.
• W3094354181 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5014634635 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5015507525 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5032185441 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5044072525 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5049731825 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5054434839 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5056671698 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5057271492 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5063425056 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5066783609 @default.
• W3094354181 hasAuthorship W3094354181A5070876327 @default.
• W3094354181 hasBestOaLocation W30943541812 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C138268822 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C2778860756 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C3020199158 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C46762472 @default.
• W3094354181 hasConcept C62649853 @default.

• next