FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3094870239> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3094870239 endingPage "S114" @default.
• W3094870239 startingPage "S114" @default.
• W3094870239 abstract "Study Objective To investigate differences in Medicare reimbursement rates between type of hysterectomy procedure, including abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic to help guide reimbursement for best practices. Design Twenty-two reimbursement codes representing hysterectomy from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. Setting Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Patients or Participants All patients who had undergone hysterectomy of any type with reimbursement by Medicare using the twenty-two codes represented in The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from 2010-2019 in the United States. Interventions Abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy reimbursed by Medicare. Measurements and Main Results A total of twenty-two codes were identified and the average annual and total percent change in reimbursement were calculated for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy. After adjusting for inflation, the average reimbursement for all hysterectomy procedures decreased by 14.97% from 2010 to 2019 with an average R2 of 0.92. The average annual change in reimbursements was 1.75%. Reimbursement for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomies decreased by 7.85%, 10.17%, and 21.16%, with an average R2 of 0.94, 0.96, 0.88, respectively. Annual decrease in reimbursements was 0.90%, 1.18%, 1.56% for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic respectively. These numbers show a decrease in reimbursement for all hysterectomies, and by hysterectomy type. Conclusion Medicare reimbursement for hysterectomy declined significantly from 2010-2019. Laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy reimbursement decreased more than other modalities. With increasing use of laparoscopic/robotic procedures for hysterectomies in gynecologic surgeries due to increased safety, it is critical to understand these reimbursement trends. A minimally invasive approach should be the standard of care for benign hysterectomy, as it has improved patient outcomes and safety. Reimbursement does not reflect this best medical practice as minimally invasive hysterectomy rates decreased more than laparotomy. Further understanding of trends is essential to provide input to policy-makers who determine these reimbursement rates. To investigate differences in Medicare reimbursement rates between type of hysterectomy procedure, including abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic to help guide reimbursement for best practices. Twenty-two reimbursement codes representing hysterectomy from The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. All patients who had undergone hysterectomy of any type with reimbursement by Medicare using the twenty-two codes represented in The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from 2010-2019 in the United States. Abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy reimbursed by Medicare. A total of twenty-two codes were identified and the average annual and total percent change in reimbursement were calculated for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy. After adjusting for inflation, the average reimbursement for all hysterectomy procedures decreased by 14.97% from 2010 to 2019 with an average R2 of 0.92. The average annual change in reimbursements was 1.75%. Reimbursement for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomies decreased by 7.85%, 10.17%, and 21.16%, with an average R2 of 0.94, 0.96, 0.88, respectively. Annual decrease in reimbursements was 0.90%, 1.18%, 1.56% for abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic/robotic respectively. These numbers show a decrease in reimbursement for all hysterectomies, and by hysterectomy type. Medicare reimbursement for hysterectomy declined significantly from 2010-2019. Laparoscopic/robotic hysterectomy reimbursement decreased more than other modalities. With increasing use of laparoscopic/robotic procedures for hysterectomies in gynecologic surgeries due to increased safety, it is critical to understand these reimbursement trends. A minimally invasive approach should be the standard of care for benign hysterectomy, as it has improved patient outcomes and safety. Reimbursement does not reflect this best medical practice as minimally invasive hysterectomy rates decreased more than laparotomy. Further understanding of trends is essential to provide input to policy-makers who determine these reimbursement rates." @default.
• W3094870239 created "2020-11-09" @default.
• W3094870239 creator A5012664303 @default.
• W3094870239 creator A5027625777 @default.
• W3094870239 creator A5043946293 @default.
• W3094870239 creator A5045822324 @default.
• W3094870239 creator A5079225733 @default.
• W3094870239 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W3094870239 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3094870239 title "An Analysis of Medicare Reimbursement Rates in Hysterectomies Performed in Gynecologic Surgery: 2010-2019" @default.
• W3094870239 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.182" @default.
• W3094870239 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3094870239 type Work @default.
• W3094870239 sameAs 3094870239 @default.
• W3094870239 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3094870239 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3094870239 hasAuthorship W3094870239A5012664303 @default.
• W3094870239 hasAuthorship W3094870239A5027625777 @default.
• W3094870239 hasAuthorship W3094870239A5043946293 @default.
• W3094870239 hasAuthorship W3094870239A5045822324 @default.
• W3094870239 hasAuthorship W3094870239A5079225733 @default.
• W3094870239 hasBestOaLocation W30948702391 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C2776534028 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C2779703844 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C131872663 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C141071460 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C160735492 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C162324750 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C2776534028 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C2779494336 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C2779703844 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C29456083 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C50522688 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C61434518 @default.
• W3094870239 hasConceptScore W3094870239C71924100 @default.
• W3094870239 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3094870239 hasLocation W30948702391 @default.
• W3094870239 hasOpenAccess W3094870239 @default.
• W3094870239 hasPrimaryLocation W30948702391 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W16048177 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W16852548 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W17469937 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W18944063 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W3402230 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W7356555 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W8281208 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W890088 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W9008113 @default.
• W3094870239 hasRelatedWork W9248791 @default.
• W3094870239 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W3094870239 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3094870239 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3094870239 magId "3094870239" @default.
• W3094870239 workType "article" @default.