FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3095914867> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3095914867 endingPage "1330" @default.
• W3095914867 startingPage "1324" @default.
• W3095914867 abstract "Background The use of a semilunar cartilage block to elevate a reconstructed ear does not always achieve a well-defined auriculocephalic sulcus. Herein, we modified the conventional crescent cartilage block through sculpting a concavity at its posterior surface, with the aim of improving the retroauricular contour. The study aimed to verify the effectiveness and reliability of this modified cartilage block through a retrospective cohort study. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent Nagata microtia reconstruction between October 2017 and November 2018 were conducted. The esthetic outcomes of auricular projection and cranioauricular sulcus in patients who accepted the modified semilunar block were compared with those of patients who underwent the same procedure using the traditional crescent pad. Results A total of 163 (84 of the modified group and 79 of the traditional group) patients were included. The mean (median) esthetic scores for ear projection in the modification and traditional groups were 3.13 (3) and 3.06 (3), respectively. The rate of favorable ear projection in the modification group (83.3%) was similar with that in the traditional group (78.5%) (p = 0.550). The mean (median) esthetic scores for cranioauricular sulcus in the modification and traditional groups were 2.51 (3) and 2.90 (3), respectively. The rate of favorable retroauricular sulcus in the modification group was 75.9%, whereas that in the traditional group was 51.2%, with the differences reaching statistical significance (p = 0.001). Conclusions The concave crescent-shaped block can improve the contour of the auriculocephalic sulcus under the premise of ensuring the ear projection. The use of a semilunar cartilage block to elevate a reconstructed ear does not always achieve a well-defined auriculocephalic sulcus. Herein, we modified the conventional crescent cartilage block through sculpting a concavity at its posterior surface, with the aim of improving the retroauricular contour. The study aimed to verify the effectiveness and reliability of this modified cartilage block through a retrospective cohort study. A retrospective review of patients who underwent Nagata microtia reconstruction between October 2017 and November 2018 were conducted. The esthetic outcomes of auricular projection and cranioauricular sulcus in patients who accepted the modified semilunar block were compared with those of patients who underwent the same procedure using the traditional crescent pad. A total of 163 (84 of the modified group and 79 of the traditional group) patients were included. The mean (median) esthetic scores for ear projection in the modification and traditional groups were 3.13 (3) and 3.06 (3), respectively. The rate of favorable ear projection in the modification group (83.3%) was similar with that in the traditional group (78.5%) (p = 0.550). The mean (median) esthetic scores for cranioauricular sulcus in the modification and traditional groups were 2.51 (3) and 2.90 (3), respectively. The rate of favorable retroauricular sulcus in the modification group was 75.9%, whereas that in the traditional group was 51.2%, with the differences reaching statistical significance (p = 0.001). The concave crescent-shaped block can improve the contour of the auriculocephalic sulcus under the premise of ensuring the ear projection." @default.
• W3095914867 created "2020-11-09" @default.
• W3095914867 creator A5005039651 @default.
• W3095914867 creator A5013814360 @default.
• W3095914867 creator A5018898066 @default.
• W3095914867 creator A5033632697 @default.
• W3095914867 creator A5069234567 @default.
• W3095914867 creator A5074314607 @default.
• W3095914867 date "2021-06-01" @default.
• W3095914867 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3095914867 title "A modified crescent cartilage block for improving the retroauricular contour of the reconstructed ear: A retrospective cohort study" @default.
• W3095914867 cites W1978490901 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2008786911 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2009701841 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2019824401 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2051622301 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2052833566 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2054943941 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2083381991 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2285081775 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2563079111 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2787977630 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2794973598 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2801396195 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2808958666 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2887065323 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W4312861614 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W4319293012 @default.
• W3095914867 cites W2037533200 @default.
• W3095914867 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.10.021" @default.
• W3095914867 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33191156" @default.
• W3095914867 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3095914867 type Work @default.
• W3095914867 sameAs 3095914867 @default.
• W3095914867 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3095914867 countsByYear W30959148672023 @default.
• W3095914867 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3095914867 hasAuthorship W3095914867A5005039651 @default.
• W3095914867 hasAuthorship W3095914867A5013814360 @default.
• W3095914867 hasAuthorship W3095914867A5018898066 @default.
• W3095914867 hasAuthorship W3095914867A5033632697 @default.
• W3095914867 hasAuthorship W3095914867A5069234567 @default.
• W3095914867 hasAuthorship W3095914867A5074314607 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C2777132076 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C2777210771 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C2780550940 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C105702510 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C141071460 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C167135981 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C2524010 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C2777132076 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C2777210771 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C2780550940 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C29694066 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C33923547 @default.
• W3095914867 hasConceptScore W3095914867C71924100 @default.
• W3095914867 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W3095914867 hasLocation W30959148671 @default.
• W3095914867 hasOpenAccess W3095914867 @default.
• W3095914867 hasPrimaryLocation W30959148671 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2002120878 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2519357708 @default.
• W3095914867 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W3095914867 hasVolume "74" @default.
• W3095914867 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3095914867 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3095914867 magId "3095914867" @default.
• W3095914867 workType "article" @default.