FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3097148968> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3097148968 endingPage "S13" @default.
• W3097148968 startingPage "S13" @default.
• W3097148968 abstract "Study Objective To demonstrate the non-inferiority of delayed absorbable sutures compared to non-absorbable sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Design It is a randomized 1:1 non-inferiority surgical clinical trial (NCT03582410). Setting Obstetric and Gynecological Department of “Ospedale Regionale F. Miulli”. Patients or Participants 160 patients, who required surgical treatment for symptomatic prolapse were assessed for eligibility. 6 patients declined to participate and 4 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. 150 patients were enrolled and all completed follow up. Interventions Patients were randomized to receive LSC with delayed absorbable (group A: 75 patients) and non-absorbable sutures (group B: 75 patients) for anterior and posterior mesh fixation to vagina. Primary outcome was the correction of the prolapse at 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Intraoperative parameters, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics and long term morbidity were considered as secondary outcomes. Measurements and Main Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. There were no differences in terms of blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications. No cases of failure and no differences in terms of prolapse correction were observed. There was bowel symptoms gradual reduction in both groups. Rate of de novo urinary incontinence and persistent urinary incontinence after 12 months was similar (respectively 7% in group A vs 5% in group B, p: 1,00 and 11 %in group A vs 5% in group B, p: 0,229). Rate of mesh erosion at 12 months was higher in group B though not statistically significant (4% vs 0%, p:0,24). Conclusion Delayed absorbable sutures are comparable to non-absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in LSC in terms of success of procedure, operative parameters, intraoperative and post-operative characteristics. Other studies are needed to clarify if absorbable sutures can be associated to a decreased rate of mesh erosions. To demonstrate the non-inferiority of delayed absorbable sutures compared to non-absorbable sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) for correction of pelvic organ prolapse. It is a randomized 1:1 non-inferiority surgical clinical trial (NCT03582410). Obstetric and Gynecological Department of “Ospedale Regionale F. Miulli”. 160 patients, who required surgical treatment for symptomatic prolapse were assessed for eligibility. 6 patients declined to participate and 4 patients did not meet inclusion criteria. 150 patients were enrolled and all completed follow up. Patients were randomized to receive LSC with delayed absorbable (group A: 75 patients) and non-absorbable sutures (group B: 75 patients) for anterior and posterior mesh fixation to vagina. Primary outcome was the correction of the prolapse at 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery. Intraoperative parameters, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics and long term morbidity were considered as secondary outcomes. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. There were no differences in terms of blood loss, operation time, intraoperative complications. No cases of failure and no differences in terms of prolapse correction were observed. There was bowel symptoms gradual reduction in both groups. Rate of de novo urinary incontinence and persistent urinary incontinence after 12 months was similar (respectively 7% in group A vs 5% in group B, p: 1,00 and 11 %in group A vs 5% in group B, p: 0,229). Rate of mesh erosion at 12 months was higher in group B though not statistically significant (4% vs 0%, p:0,24). Delayed absorbable sutures are comparable to non-absorbable sutures for mesh fixation in LSC in terms of success of procedure, operative parameters, intraoperative and post-operative characteristics. Other studies are needed to clarify if absorbable sutures can be associated to a decreased rate of mesh erosions." @default.
• W3097148968 created "2020-11-09" @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5006024160 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5019810272 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5028642466 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5029193050 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5030733912 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5041135918 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5042268927 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5071726618 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5085103611 @default.
• W3097148968 creator A5089608977 @default.
• W3097148968 date "2020-11-01" @default.
• W3097148968 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W3097148968 title "Comparison between Delayed Absorbable and Permanent Sutures in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial" @default.
• W3097148968 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.08.059" @default.
• W3097148968 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3097148968 type Work @default.
• W3097148968 sameAs 3097148968 @default.
• W3097148968 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3097148968 countsByYear W30971489682023 @default.
• W3097148968 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5006024160 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5019810272 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5028642466 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5029193050 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5030733912 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5041135918 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5042268927 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5071726618 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5085103611 @default.
• W3097148968 hasAuthorship W3097148968A5089608977 @default.
• W3097148968 hasBestOaLocation W30971489681 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C2777744392 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C2778531004 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C2779091618 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C2991743468 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConcept C77411442 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C126322002 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C141071460 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C168563851 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C2777744392 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C2778531004 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C2779091618 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C2780047204 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C2991743468 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C71924100 @default.
• W3097148968 hasConceptScore W3097148968C77411442 @default.
• W3097148968 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3097148968 hasLocation W30971489681 @default.
• W3097148968 hasOpenAccess W3097148968 @default.
• W3097148968 hasPrimaryLocation W30971489681 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W1550685264 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W1977496497 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W2008649453 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W2024502863 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W2027325131 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W2360268570 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W2913619846 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W2917438197 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W4313382530 @default.
• W3097148968 hasRelatedWork W4383896537 @default.
• W3097148968 hasVolume "27" @default.
• W3097148968 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3097148968 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3097148968 magId "3097148968" @default.
• W3097148968 workType "article" @default.