FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3098457094> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3098457094 abstract "There is great controversy about whether the consumption of different types of alcoholic beverages has different effects on health. The objective was to carry out an umbrella review of the studies that described the association between the consumption of different types of alcoholic beverages and various health indicators.Search through PubMed (from January 2000 to February 2019) of systematic reviews and meta-analysis that reported quantitative results of the association between the consumption of different types of alcoholic beverages and health effects. 26 studies were identified: 21 related to cancer, three to cardiometabolic diseases, two to neurodegenerative diseases, and one to general mortality.The results were heterogeneous. The great methodological differences in the estimation of alcohol intake, control of confounding variables, and the evaluation of statistical difference between types of beverages, made it very difficult to conclude whether they cause an unequal effect on health. In general mortality and cardiometabolic diseases, it was suggested that beer and spirits appear to have a greater negative effect than wine, but the differences were not statistically significant. Regarding cancer, in those types where the causal evidence is totally consistent: oropharynx, colorectal and breast (women), the reviews did not show a differentiated effect according to the type of alcoholic beverages. Regarding neurodegenerative diseases, the available information did not allow clear conclusions to be drawn.The reviewed evidence does not allow to conclude that the consumption of wine, beer or spirits, has a differential effect on cardiometabolic, cancer or neurodegenerative diseases.Existe gran controversia sobre si el consumo de diversos tipos de bebidas alcohólicas tiene efectos diferenciados en la salud. El objetivo de este estudio fue realizar una revisión paraguas de los estudios que describían la asociación del consumo de diferentes tipos de bebidas alcohólicas con diversos indicadores de salud.Se realizó una búsqueda a través de PubMed (entre enero de 2000 y febrero de 2019) de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis que reportaban resultados cuantitativos de la asociación entre el consumo de diferentes tipos de bebidas alcohólicas y efectos en salud. Se identificaron 26 estudios: veintiuno estaban relacionados con cáncer, tres con enfermedades cardiometabólicas, dos con neurodegenerativas y uno con mortalidad general.Los resultados fueron heterogéneos. Las grandes diferencias metodológicas en la estimación de la ingesta de alcohol, el control de las variables confusoras y el contraste de las estimaciones entre el tipo de bebidas hacían muy difícil concluir sobre si provocaban un efecto desigual en la salud. En la mortalidad general y las enfermedades cardiometabólicas, aunque parece que la cerveza y los licores tenían un mayor efecto negativo que el vino, las diferencias entre tipos de bebidas no eran estadísticamente significativas. Respecto al cáncer, en aquellos tipos cuya evidencia causal era totalmente consistente (orofaringe, colorrectal y de mama [mujeres]), las revisiones no mostraban un efecto diferenciado según los tipos de bebidas alcohólicas. Respecto a las enfermedades neurodegenerativas, la información disponible tampoco permitía establecer claras conclusiones.La evidencia revisada no permite afirmar que el consumo de vino, cerveza o licores tenga un efecto diferencial en las enfermedades cardiometabólicas, las neurodegenerativas o el cáncer." @default.
• W3098457094 created "2020-11-23" @default.
• W3098457094 creator A5010173093 @default.
• W3098457094 creator A5033415746 @default.
• W3098457094 creator A5050662989 @default.
• W3098457094 creator A5075574979 @default.
• W3098457094 date "2020-11-13" @default.
• W3098457094 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3098457094 title "[Differential health effects of alcoholic beverages: an umbrella review of observational studies.]" @default.
• W3098457094 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33177485" @default.
• W3098457094 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3098457094 type Work @default.
• W3098457094 sameAs 3098457094 @default.
• W3098457094 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3098457094 countsByYear W30984570942021 @default.
• W3098457094 countsByYear W30984570942022 @default.
• W3098457094 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3098457094 hasAuthorship W3098457094A5010173093 @default.
• W3098457094 hasAuthorship W3098457094A5033415746 @default.
• W3098457094 hasAuthorship W3098457094A5050662989 @default.
• W3098457094 hasAuthorship W3098457094A5075574979 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C2781066024 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C3019635848 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C30772137 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C55952523 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C77350462 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C142724271 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C144024400 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C23131810 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C2781066024 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C3019635848 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C30772137 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C31903555 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C36289849 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C55493867 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C55952523 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C71924100 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C77350462 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C86803240 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C95190672 @default.
• W3098457094 hasConceptScore W3098457094C99454951 @default.
• W3098457094 hasLocation W30984570941 @default.
• W3098457094 hasOpenAccess W3098457094 @default.
• W3098457094 hasPrimaryLocation W30984570941 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W15832894 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W17250226 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W17927112 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W21364855 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W21447988 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W7183868 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W7424893 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W9212623 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W967645 @default.
• W3098457094 hasRelatedWork W2154812 @default.
• W3098457094 hasVolume "94" @default.
• W3098457094 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3098457094 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3098457094 magId "3098457094" @default.
• W3098457094 workType "article" @default.