FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3100196833> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3100196833 endingPage "202" @default.
• W3100196833 startingPage "193" @default.
• W3100196833 abstract "The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program was launched in Ontario, Canada, to promote a culture of quality. It mandates the province’s largest-volume emergency departments (EDs) to audit charts of patients who had a return visit leading to hospital admission, including some of their 72-hour all-cause return visits with admission and all of their 7-day ones with sentinel diagnoses (ie, acute myocardial infarction, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and pediatric sepsis), and submit their findings to a governmental agency. This provides an opportunity to identify possible adverse events and quality issues, which hospitals can then address through quality improvement initiatives. A group of emergency physicians with quality improvement expertise analyzed the submitted audits and accompanying narrative templates, using a general inductive approach to develop a novel classification of recurrent quality themes. Since the Return Visit Quality Program launched in 2016, 125,698 return visits with admission have been identified, representing 0.93% of the 86 participating EDs’ 13,559,664 visits. Overall, participating hospitals have conducted 12,852 detailed chart audits, uncovering 3,010 (23.4%) adverse events/quality issues and undertaking hundreds of quality improvement provincewide projects as a result. The inductive analysis revealed 11 recurrent themes, classified into 3 groupings: patient characteristics (ie, patient risk profile and elder care), ED team actions or processes (ie, physician cognitive lapses, documentation, handover/communication between providers, radiology, vital signs, and high-risk medications or medication interactions), and health care system issues (ie, discharge planning/community follow-up, left against medical advice/left without being seen, and imaging/testing availability). The Return Visit Quality Program is the largest mandatory audit program for EDs and provides a novel approach to identify local adverse events/quality issues to target for improved patient safety and quality of care. It provides a blueprint for health system leaders to enable clinicians to develop an approach to organizational quality, as well as for teams to construct an audit system that yields defined issues amenable to improvement. The Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program was launched in Ontario, Canada, to promote a culture of quality. It mandates the province’s largest-volume emergency departments (EDs) to audit charts of patients who had a return visit leading to hospital admission, including some of their 72-hour all-cause return visits with admission and all of their 7-day ones with sentinel diagnoses (ie, acute myocardial infarction, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and pediatric sepsis), and submit their findings to a governmental agency. This provides an opportunity to identify possible adverse events and quality issues, which hospitals can then address through quality improvement initiatives. A group of emergency physicians with quality improvement expertise analyzed the submitted audits and accompanying narrative templates, using a general inductive approach to develop a novel classification of recurrent quality themes. Since the Return Visit Quality Program launched in 2016, 125,698 return visits with admission have been identified, representing 0.93% of the 86 participating EDs’ 13,559,664 visits. Overall, participating hospitals have conducted 12,852 detailed chart audits, uncovering 3,010 (23.4%) adverse events/quality issues and undertaking hundreds of quality improvement provincewide projects as a result. The inductive analysis revealed 11 recurrent themes, classified into 3 groupings: patient characteristics (ie, patient risk profile and elder care), ED team actions or processes (ie, physician cognitive lapses, documentation, handover/communication between providers, radiology, vital signs, and high-risk medications or medication interactions), and health care system issues (ie, discharge planning/community follow-up, left against medical advice/left without being seen, and imaging/testing availability). The Return Visit Quality Program is the largest mandatory audit program for EDs and provides a novel approach to identify local adverse events/quality issues to target for improved patient safety and quality of care. It provides a blueprint for health system leaders to enable clinicians to develop an approach to organizational quality, as well as for teams to construct an audit system that yields defined issues amenable to improvement." @default.
• W3100196833 created "2020-11-23" @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5024547323 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5026544607 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5059455542 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5065062663 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5080702949 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5084521291 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5085248793 @default.
• W3100196833 creator A5091759480 @default.
• W3100196833 date "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3100196833 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W3100196833 title "Improving Quality of Care Through a Mandatory Provincial Audit Program: Ontario’s Emergency Department Return Visit Quality Program" @default.
• W3100196833 cites W1555190519 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W1909512799 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W1990157321 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W1992246530 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2010166377 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2016461965 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2019715241 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2039474557 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2056199401 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2068794520 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2073565853 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2080137608 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2088156068 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2088731482 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2104123586 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2142535811 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2150104072 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2161351595 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2271129476 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2280491322 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2310946224 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2473255459 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2525926077 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2573795017 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2758235045 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W2994997329 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W3002830791 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W4226022141 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W4242732483 @default.
• W3100196833 cites W4367329869 @default.
• W3100196833 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.449" @default.
• W3100196833 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33199045" @default.
• W3100196833 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3100196833 type Work @default.
• W3100196833 sameAs 3100196833 @default.
• W3100196833 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W3100196833 countsByYear W31001968332021 @default.
• W3100196833 countsByYear W31001968332022 @default.
• W3100196833 countsByYear W31001968332023 @default.
• W3100196833 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5024547323 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5026544607 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5059455542 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5065062663 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5080702949 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5084521291 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5085248793 @default.
• W3100196833 hasAuthorship W3100196833A5091759480 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C198783460 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C71405471 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C159110408 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C160735492 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C162324750 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C187736073 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C194828623 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C198783460 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C199360897 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C199521495 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C21547014 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C2780724011 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C41008148 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C50522688 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C512399662 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C545542383 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C56666940 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C71405471 @default.
• W3100196833 hasConceptScore W3100196833C71924100 @default.
• W3100196833 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3100196833 hasLocation W31001968331 @default.
• W3100196833 hasOpenAccess W3100196833 @default.

• next