FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3100590311> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3100590311 abstract "Philosophy articles on prepositional attitudes, attitude content, and related matters sometimes begin by reminding us that there are many prepositional attitudes besides belief: there are desire, intention, remembering, guessing, speculating, wondering, hoping, wishing, resenting, regretting, being embarrassed, and whatnot. Those same philosophy articles then immediately serve notice that, for simplicity, they will discuss only belief. Desire, intention, and memory very occasionally receive attention from philosophers of mind and philosophers of psychology; the other attitudes almost never. It is an interesting question why belief holds this overwhelming social preeminence over the other attitudes. Similarly, philosophy articles on perception sometimes begin by reminding us that there are other senses besides vision; but those articles then immediately serve notice that, for simplicity, they will discuss only vision. The other senses—especially the chemical senses, smell, and taste—almost never receive the slightest attention from philosophers (though noteworthy exceptions are Perkins, 1983, and Clark, 1993). Psychologists and neuroscientists have, of course, done work on smell, but there, too, not nearly as much as they have on vision and usually in pursuit of research on something else, such as memory. My question here is how the philosophy of perception would be different if smell had been taken as a paradigm rather than vision. I argue that vision is not a typical sense modality at all, but a very unusual, unrepresentative example of one. If I am right about that, then we may expect to find that the philosophy of perception has been warped and skewed by its persistent focus on vision. And—now that the Decade of Neurophilosophy is over—I contemplate ushering in the era of Rhinophilosophy (or more grandly, Osphresiophilosophy). But the claims I shall actually make here will be only rudimentary. There is a difference between the social preeminence of belief and that of vision. For it is arguable that, in fact, belief is conceptually prior to the other attitudes. The more rarified prepositional attitudes may well be denned partly in doxastic terms; for example, a correct analysis of regret or wish or even memory would very probably make mention of belief, but not vice versa." @default.
• W3100590311 created "2020-11-23" @default.
• W3100590311 creator A5005106562 @default.
• W3100590311 date "2000-12-21" @default.
• W3100590311 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3100590311 title "The Slighting of Smell (with a Brief Word on the Slighting of Chemistry)" @default.
• W3100590311 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195128345.003.0026" @default.
• W3100590311 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W3100590311 type Work @default.
• W3100590311 sameAs 3100590311 @default.
• W3100590311 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3100590311 countsByYear W31005903112013 @default.
• W3100590311 countsByYear W31005903112023 @default.
• W3100590311 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W3100590311 hasAuthorship W3100590311A5005106562 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C182744844 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C24726157 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C2776372474 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C2779913896 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConcept C8868529 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C107038049 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C111472728 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C138885662 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C15744967 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C169760540 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C17744445 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C180747234 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C182744844 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C199539241 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C24726157 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C26760741 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C2776372474 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C2779913896 @default.
• W3100590311 hasConceptScore W3100590311C8868529 @default.
• W3100590311 hasLocation W31005903111 @default.
• W3100590311 hasOpenAccess W3100590311 @default.
• W3100590311 hasPrimaryLocation W31005903111 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2046659574 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2070237887 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2083602350 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2141447618 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2347742332 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2366677945 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2371533443 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W3001206185 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W4287578410 @default.
• W3100590311 hasRelatedWork W2185154429 @default.
• W3100590311 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3100590311 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3100590311 magId "3100590311" @default.
• W3100590311 workType "book-chapter" @default.