Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3101425977> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3101425977 endingPage "e18588" @default.
- W3101425977 startingPage "e18588" @default.
- W3101425977 abstract "Background Longitudinal follow-up of older persons living with HIV is essential for the ascertainment of aging-related clinical and behavioral outcomes, and self-administered questionnaires are necessary for collecting behavioral information in research involving persons living with HIV. Web-based self-reported data collection results in higher data quality than paper-and-pencil questionnaires in a wide range of populations. The option of remote web-based surveys may also increase retention in long-term research studies. However, the acceptability and feasibility of web-based data collection in clinical research involving older persons living with HIV have never been studied. Objective This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of a web-based survey to collect information on sexual, substance use, and physical activity behaviors; compare the data quality of the web-based survey with that of a paper-and-pencil questionnaire; and summarize web-based survey metrics. Methods This pilot study took place within the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5322 study, a longitudinal cohort of men and women living with HIV (aged ≥40 years), followed at 32 clinical sites in the United States and Puerto Rico. A total of 4 sites participated in this study. A web-based survey was created using self-administered questionnaires typically completed in A5322 via paper and pencil. Pilot study participants completed these questionnaires via web-based survey at one research visit in lieu of paper-and-pencil administration. Two questions were added to assess feasibility, defined as participants’ perception of the ease of web-based survey completion (very hard, hard, easy, very easy), and their preferred format (computer or tablet, paper and pencil, no preference) for completing the questions in the future (acceptability). Feasibility and acceptability were summarized overall and by demographic and clinical characteristics; the proportion of evaluable data by web-based survey versus previously administered paper-and-pencil questionnaires (data quality) was compared for each question. Results Acceptability and feasibility were high overall: 50.0% (79/158) preferred computer or tablet, 38.0% (60/158) reported no preference, and 12.0% (19/158) preferred paper and pencil; 93.0% (147/158) reported survey completion easy or very easy. Older age was associated with lower odds of preferring computer or tablet to paper and pencil (odds ratio per 1-year increase in age: 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98). Individuals who found the survey hard or very hard had a lower median neurocognitive test score than those who found it easy or very easy. Data quality with web-based survey administration was similar to or higher than that with paper-and-pencil administration for most questions. Conclusions Web-based survey administration was acceptable and feasible in this cohort of older adults living with HIV, and data quality was high. Web-based surveys can be a useful tool for valid data collection and can potentially improve retention in long-term follow-up studies." @default.
- W3101425977 created "2020-11-23" @default.
- W3101425977 creator A5002402949 @default.
- W3101425977 creator A5009227700 @default.
- W3101425977 creator A5024664765 @default.
- W3101425977 creator A5035006251 @default.
- W3101425977 date "2020-11-11" @default.
- W3101425977 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W3101425977 title "Web-Based Data Collection for Older Adults Living With HIV in a Clinical Research Setting: Pilot Observational Study" @default.
- W3101425977 cites W1547118922 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W1978753737 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2031201873 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2031506528 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2039488416 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2062395311 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2073650804 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2079980561 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2081533826 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2107252782 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2114661329 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2128529067 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2146545407 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2160084130 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2160780574 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2164059021 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2166547801 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2167343667 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2170056569 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2171129594 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2557617580 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2588215788 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2750317135 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2772834027 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2787335021 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2803196415 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2805868851 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2897362036 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2901941835 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2906817738 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2911384374 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2913262603 @default.
- W3101425977 cites W2984639147 @default.
- W3101425977 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/18588" @default.
- W3101425977 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7688395" @default.
- W3101425977 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33174854" @default.
- W3101425977 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3101425977 type Work @default.
- W3101425977 sameAs 3101425977 @default.
- W3101425977 citedByCount "3" @default.
- W3101425977 countsByYear W31014259772021 @default.
- W3101425977 countsByYear W31014259772022 @default.
- W3101425977 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3101425977 hasAuthorship W3101425977A5002402949 @default.
- W3101425977 hasAuthorship W3101425977A5009227700 @default.
- W3101425977 hasAuthorship W3101425977A5024664765 @default.
- W3101425977 hasAuthorship W3101425977A5035006251 @default.
- W3101425977 hasBestOaLocation W31014259771 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C118643609 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C105795698 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C118643609 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C133462117 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C136764020 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C142724271 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C159110408 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C23131810 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C2779951463 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C33923547 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C41008148 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C512399662 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C71924100 @default.
- W3101425977 hasConceptScore W3101425977C74909509 @default.
- W3101425977 hasIssue "11" @default.
- W3101425977 hasLocation W31014259771 @default.
- W3101425977 hasLocation W31014259772 @default.
- W3101425977 hasLocation W31014259773 @default.
- W3101425977 hasLocation W31014259774 @default.
- W3101425977 hasOpenAccess W3101425977 @default.
- W3101425977 hasPrimaryLocation W31014259771 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W1964732995 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W1992192464 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W2056913546 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W2169240202 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W2340933624 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W2765980456 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W2921796151 @default.
- W3101425977 hasRelatedWork W2976382042 @default.