FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3103065587> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3103065587 abstract "Abstract Background To date the description of mechanically ventilated patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has focussed on admission characteristics with no consideration of the dynamic course of the disease. Here, we present a data-driven analysis of granular, daily data from a representative proportion of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) within the United Kingdom (UK) to evaluate the complete natural history of COVID-19. Methods We included adult patients undergoing IMV within 48 hours of ICU admission with complete clinical data until intensive care unit (ICU) death or discharge. We examined factors and trajectories that determined disease progression and responsiveness to interventions used in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Our data visualisation tool is available as a web-based widget ( https://www.CovidUK.ICU ). Findings Data for 633 adults with COVID-19 who were mechanically ventilated between 01 March 2020 and 31 August 2020 were analysed. Mortality, intensity of mechanical ventilation and severity of organ injury increased with severity of hypoxaemia. Median PaO 2 /FiO 2 in non-survivors on the day of death was 12.3(8.9-18.4) kPa suggesting severe refractory hypoxaemia as a major contributor to mortality. Non-resolution of hypoxaemia over the first week of IMV was associated with higher ICU mortality (60.4% versus 17.6%; P<0.001). The reported ideal body weight overestimated our calculated ideal body weight derived from reported height, with three-quarters of all reported tidal volume values were above 6mL/kg of ideal body weight. Overall, 76% of patients with moderate hypoxaemia and 46% with severe did not undergo prone position at any stage of admission. Furthermore, only 45% showed a persistent oxygenation response on prone position. Non-responders to prone position show higher lactate, D-Dimers, troponin, cardiovascular component of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and higher ICU mortality (69.5% versus 31.1%; P<0.001). There was no difference in number of prone sessions between survivors and non-survivors, however, patients who died without receiving prone position had a greater number of missed opportunities for prone intervention (7(3-15.5) versus 2(0-6); P<0.001). Interpretation A sizeable proportion of patients with progressive worsening of hypoxaemia had no application of and were refractory to evidence based ARDS strategies and showed a higher mortality. Strategies for early recognition and management of COVID-19 patients refractory to conventional management strategies will be critical to improving future outcomes. Research in context Evidence before this study Beyond the regular literature expertise of our consortium, we enhanced our literature review - due to the fast-evolving Covid-19 publication situation-by searching PubMed for articles published in English or with English language abstracts on October 26, 2020 (and before), with the terms “mechanical ventilation”, “prone position”, “AND (“coronavirus” OR “COVID-19”). Studies including patients not receiving ventilation were excluded, as were those reporting on paediatric and single-centre populations. Note, that neither of those studies analysed the data with respect to the temporal evolution of patients and at our level of granularity. Only four multicentre studies reported detailed ventilator settings and outcomes in ventilated patients with COVID-19. All studies showed only ventilator settings with restricted time points either on admission or the first 4 days of admission. None enabled granular visualisation and analysis of longitudinal ICU trajectory and management. Added value of this study This study provides a comprehensive analysis and visualisation of routine clinical measurements tracking the whole ICU time course of patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation for COVID-19. Mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 have a different natural history and trajectory from descriptions of non-COVID ARDS patients, not predictable from admission physiology. Refractory hypoxaemia is an attributable factor associated with poor outcomes in Covid-19 and hence, understanding of use and utility of evidence-based ARDS interventions is clinically crucial. Opportunities to apply prone positioning appropriately are frequently missed, application of high levels of PEEP, and higher tidal volume delivery than planned is common. Lack of responsiveness to advanced ARDS management is associated with hypercoagulation and cardiovascular instability. These data may help homogenise future clinical management protocols and suggest change-of-practice trials. Implications of all the available evidence This study shows that disease progression in Covid-19 during the first surge occurred more frequently and for longer than other forms of respiratory failure from pre-Covid19 studies. Furthermore, variations in clinical practise occur across sites which may benefit from standardisation of evidence-based practise. Patients that do not resolve hypoxaemia over the first week have a significantly higher mortality, and, crucially, that a significant proportion are refractory to prone interventions and show variability in responses to PEEP changes. Opportunities to implement prone position were missed in many patients and this was compounded with its reduced effect on oxygenation with delayed application. This lack of responsiveness is related to indices of inflammation, thrombosis, and cardiac dysfunction suggesting that pulmonary thrombosis could influence prone responsiveness and should be pro-actively investigated in the setting of refractory Covid-19 ARDS. Prediction of failure to resolve or respond to ARDS interventions could further focus research on this group with worse outcome." @default.
• W3103065587 created "2020-11-23" @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5007793369 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5008247306 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5010976179 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5016604684 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5018225233 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5029061731 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5037584185 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5043584137 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5044883951 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5046126733 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5048785087 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5051817098 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5054928970 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5060700722 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5067043433 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5068686133 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5081268468 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5086213424 @default.
• W3103065587 creator A5089227808 @default.
• W3103065587 date "2020-11-13" @default.
• W3103065587 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W3103065587 title "Natural history, trajectory, and management of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the United Kingdom" @default.
• W3103065587 cites W1803784511 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2014748626 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2027892117 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2041783300 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2074308834 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2097387720 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2106923828 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2286228001 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2325626276 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2775771164 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2896893468 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2900602912 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W2998886261 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3012627062 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3013176450 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3017005464 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3026764413 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3027918021 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3032415706 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3036700224 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3038199445 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3042486011 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3046629770 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3048382678 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3048608983 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3080517202 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3081015435 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3082132153 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3089328061 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3092644887 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3094251384 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3095192091 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3100383641 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3107195649 @default.
• W3103065587 cites W3108304840 @default.
• W3103065587 doi "https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.10.20226688" @default.
• W3103065587 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3103065587 type Work @default.
• W3103065587 sameAs 3103065587 @default.
• W3103065587 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3103065587 countsByYear W31030655872021 @default.
• W3103065587 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5007793369 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5008247306 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5010976179 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5016604684 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5018225233 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5029061731 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5037584185 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5043584137 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5044883951 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5046126733 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5048785087 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5051817098 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5054928970 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5060700722 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5067043433 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5068686133 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5081268468 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5086213424 @default.
• W3103065587 hasAuthorship W3103065587A5089227808 @default.
• W3103065587 hasBestOaLocation W31030655871 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C194828623 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2776348555 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2776376669 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2777080012 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2777257755 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2777714996 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C534529494 @default.
• W3103065587 hasConcept C71924100 @default.

• next