Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3105012336> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W3105012336 endingPage "932" @default.
- W3105012336 startingPage "928" @default.
- W3105012336 abstract "The aim of this study was to compare open surgery (OS) with laparoscopic surgery (LS) for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) disease using a National dataset.PPU disease is typically treated surgically with an omental patch. This can be performed through OS or a LS. Current evidence in OS versus LS suggests equivalence in mortality and postoperative complications, but a decrease in pain and wound infections with LS.A one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis of patients who underwent PPU repair from December 2013 to December 2017 using data from the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit was performed. Patients with an initially laparoscopic approach were classed as LS even if converted to OS. The primary end-point was 90-day mortality; secondary endpoints were length of stay (LOS), re-operation, and re-admission to critical care. Multivariable logistic and linear models were created to compare the effect of operative approach on binary and continuous outcomes with log-rank tests for time-to-event data.A total of 5253 patients underwent surgery in the study period. After propensity-matching, 2 groups of 1158 patients were created. Overall 90-day mortality was 7.5%. There was no difference between the LA and OA for 90-day mortality (7.2% vs 8.5%, OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.56- 1.15, P = 0.23), median LOS (equivalent at 7 days, P = 0.09), reoperation (3.6% vs 4.0%, P = 0.74), or re-admission to critical care (2.8% vs 2.9%, P = 0.92). Across the 4-year study period LS use increased from 20% to 26% and the conversion rate decreased from 40% to 31%.Short outcomes from laparoscopic PPU repair appear equivalent to open repair. There is increasing adoption of LS with decreasing conversion rates. LS for PPU appears to be an acceptable approach in this setting." @default.
- W3105012336 created "2020-11-23" @default.
- W3105012336 creator A5015427306 @default.
- W3105012336 creator A5030271397 @default.
- W3105012336 creator A5043428373 @default.
- W3105012336 creator A5068918350 @default.
- W3105012336 creator A5073629215 @default.
- W3105012336 date "2020-11-12" @default.
- W3105012336 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3105012336 title "Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease" @default.
- W3105012336 cites W1560127600 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2022594437 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2024804906 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2026434976 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2047839021 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2075029658 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2085008925 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2094149833 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2104111028 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2159381236 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2503132017 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2884769329 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2884904099 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2888155635 @default.
- W3105012336 cites W2941160067 @default.
- W3105012336 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004332" @default.
- W3105012336 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33201117" @default.
- W3105012336 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3105012336 type Work @default.
- W3105012336 sameAs 3105012336 @default.
- W3105012336 citedByCount "7" @default.
- W3105012336 countsByYear W31050123362021 @default.
- W3105012336 countsByYear W31050123362022 @default.
- W3105012336 countsByYear W31050123362023 @default.
- W3105012336 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3105012336 hasAuthorship W3105012336A5015427306 @default.
- W3105012336 hasAuthorship W3105012336A5030271397 @default.
- W3105012336 hasAuthorship W3105012336A5043428373 @default.
- W3105012336 hasAuthorship W3105012336A5068918350 @default.
- W3105012336 hasAuthorship W3105012336A5073629215 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C17923572 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C203092338 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C2780047204 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C2780778865 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C141071460 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C168563851 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C17923572 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C203092338 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C2780047204 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C2780778865 @default.
- W3105012336 hasConceptScore W3105012336C71924100 @default.
- W3105012336 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W3105012336 hasLocation W31050123361 @default.
- W3105012336 hasLocation W31050123362 @default.
- W3105012336 hasOpenAccess W3105012336 @default.
- W3105012336 hasPrimaryLocation W31050123361 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W1993508486 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W2020029755 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W2169511669 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W2365957167 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W2390961722 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W2417628092 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W2418341139 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W3112851427 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W3127657135 @default.
- W3105012336 hasRelatedWork W3147411665 @default.
- W3105012336 hasVolume "275" @default.
- W3105012336 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3105012336 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3105012336 magId "3105012336" @default.
- W3105012336 workType "article" @default.