FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3106932406> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3106932406 abstract "Purpose. In our experiment, effect of weed technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietium L.) was set up in 2018 and 2019 at the Szeged-Othalom experimental area.Methods. In the first year we applied mechanical weed control in addition to pre-emergence herbicide (May 19, 2018) and 6–8 leaf chickpeas (June 20, 2018) in addition to post-emergence herbicide treatments. The year 2019 was different in that after the pre-emergence treatment (April 10, 2019), the post-emergence treatment of chickpeas with 6–8 leaf condition (May 15, 2019) was repeated in the budding state (June 18, 2019). The yield components one way analysis of variance was prepared using SPSS 22 software and graphic representation of the development of the plants was carried out Svab's cumulative yield analysis.Results. The effect of the treatments of 2018 and 2019 on the yield elements of chickpeas can be illustrated graphically in Figure 1 and Figure 2. For both years, the data are from plots of the ʻRealeʼ variety, where the 100% level is made up of the yield elements of the weed-free plots, and the yield elements of the other treatments are compared to this. Figure 1 shows that the number of shoots per unit area (1 m2) of weed-free plots that did not control weeds was 15%, the number of pods 45%, the number of seeds 58% and the weight of seeds 49% less than the weed-free control plots the same crop elements. Weeds were also significantly present in the plots treated only with pre-emergence treatment in the second half of the growing season, so the number of shoots per unit area was 3 %, the number of pods 23 %, the number of seeds 34% and the seed weight 35 % lower, as on weed-free plots. In the case of herbicide treatments, the decrease in yield elements was much smaller: the number of plants per unit area by 1%, the number of shoots by 3–10%, the number of pods by 5–12%, the number of seeds by 13–18%, the seed weight was by 1–5% less than on mechanically weed-controlled plots. Conclusions. Our two-year weed survey results show that the later sowing time of chickpeas favored warm-loving weeds. This is in complete agreement with the opinion of Nagy (2017), who found that sowing time determines the predominant weed species in a given area. At the same time, the statement of Kurnik (1970) was not confirmed, since in our experiment we proved in the case of ʻRealeʼ cultivar that the later sowing stock in 2018 gave higher yields than the plots with earlier sowing time in 2019. The changing weather caused by climate change makes the site characteristics of the given period much more unpredictable, so the yield is determined much more by the field factors developed during the growing season than by the calendar period." @default.
• W3106932406 created "2020-12-07" @default.
• W3106932406 creator A5036199120 @default.
• W3106932406 creator A5068361270 @default.
• W3106932406 creator A5080641932 @default.
• W3106932406 creator A5086529546 @default.
• W3106932406 date "2019-12-23" @default.
• W3106932406 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3106932406 title "Effect of weed control technologies on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) and weeds" @default.
• W3106932406 cites W1125060716 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2105249359 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2167826652 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2230189247 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2296961533 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2945691309 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2978369984 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W3146894849 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W317605763 @default.
• W3106932406 cites W2189312916 @default.
• W3106932406 doi "https://doi.org/10.47414/na.7.2019.204790" @default.
• W3106932406 hasPublicationYear "2019" @default.
• W3106932406 type Work @default.
• W3106932406 sameAs 3106932406 @default.
• W3106932406 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3106932406 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3106932406 hasAuthorship W3106932406A5036199120 @default.
• W3106932406 hasAuthorship W3106932406A5068361270 @default.
• W3106932406 hasAuthorship W3106932406A5080641932 @default.
• W3106932406 hasAuthorship W3106932406A5086529546 @default.
• W3106932406 hasBestOaLocation W31069324061 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C134121241 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C137580998 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C144027150 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C147273371 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C2775891814 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C6557445 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C134121241 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C137580998 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C144027150 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C147273371 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C191897082 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C192562407 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C2775891814 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C6557445 @default.
• W3106932406 hasConceptScore W3106932406C86803240 @default.
• W3106932406 hasLocation W31069324061 @default.
• W3106932406 hasOpenAccess W3106932406 @default.
• W3106932406 hasPrimaryLocation W31069324061 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W14386328 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W14581029 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W1569045 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W15862966 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W16758760 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W2178923 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W23372714 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W38955333 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W39380517 @default.
• W3106932406 hasRelatedWork W6086374 @default.
• W3106932406 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3106932406 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3106932406 magId "3106932406" @default.
• W3106932406 workType "article" @default.