FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3107120136> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3107120136 endingPage "1069" @default.
• W3107120136 startingPage "1060" @default.
• W3107120136 abstract "To assess whether routine fundus photography (RFP) to screen for posterior segment disease at community eye clinics (vision centers [VCs]) in India increases referral to centralized ophthalmolic care.Stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized trial.Patients aged 40 to 75 years and those aged 20 to 40 years with a known history of hypertension or diabetes mellitus presenting to 4 technician-run VCs associated with the Aravind Eye Care System in India.VCs (clusters) were randomized to standard care or RFP across five 2-week study periods (steps). Patients in each cluster received standard care initially. At the start of each subsequent step, a randomly chosen cluster crossed over to providing RFP to eligible patients. All clusters took part in RFP during the last step. Standard care involved technician eye exams, optional fundus photography, and teleconsultation with an ophthalmologist. RFP involved eye exams, dilation and 40-degree fundus photography, and teleconsultation with an ophthalmologist.Standard care and RFP clusters were compared by the proportion of patients referred for in-person evaluation by an ophthalmologist because of fundus photography findings and urgency of referral (urgently in ≤ 2 weeks vs. nonurgently in > 2 weeks). Generalized linear mixed models adjusting for cluster and step were used to estimate the odds of referral due to fundus photography findings compared with standard care.A total of 1447 patients were enrolled across the VCs, including 737 in the standard care group and 710 in the RFP group. Compared with standard care, the RFP group had a higher proportion of referrals due to fundus photography findings (11.3% vs. 4.4%), nonurgent referrals due to fundus photography (9.3% vs. 3.3%), and urgent referrals due to fundus photography (1.8% vs. 1.1%). The RFP intervention was associated with a 2-fold increased odds of being referred because of photography findings compared with standard care (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-4.40; P = 0.058).Adding RFP to community eye clinics was associated with an increased odds of referral compared with standard care. This increase in referral was mostly due to nonurgent posterior segment disease." @default.
• W3107120136 created "2020-12-07" @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5031202233 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5037232419 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5041532736 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5045266317 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5058262329 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5060596981 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5063785645 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5069141757 @default.
• W3107120136 creator A5075688314 @default.
• W3107120136 date "2021-07-01" @default.
• W3107120136 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3107120136 title "The Utility of Routine Fundus Photography Screening for Posterior Segment Disease" @default.
• W3107120136 cites W1577487871 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W1980263638 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2024175435 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2031227357 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2032039690 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2062255156 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2078595280 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2153155459 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2161603660 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2169961704 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2194093106 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2228998890 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2248253598 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2473828516 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2532922943 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2598442119 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2727603722 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2761604622 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2772246530 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2778550933 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2789073150 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2792026451 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2804920713 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2911117417 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2949074827 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2968617104 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W2972844301 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W3001608637 @default.
• W3107120136 cites W65360543 @default.
• W3107120136 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.025" @default.
• W3107120136 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/8155108" @default.
• W3107120136 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33253756" @default.
• W3107120136 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3107120136 type Work @default.
• W3107120136 sameAs 3107120136 @default.
• W3107120136 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W3107120136 countsByYear W31071201362022 @default.
• W3107120136 countsByYear W31071201362023 @default.
• W3107120136 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5031202233 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5037232419 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5041532736 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5045266317 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5058262329 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5060596981 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5063785645 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5069141757 @default.
• W3107120136 hasAuthorship W3107120136A5075688314 @default.
• W3107120136 hasBestOaLocation W31071201362 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C2776135927 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C2776229289 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C2776391266 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C2776474195 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C2780248432 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C2780827179 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C118487528 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C119599485 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C119767625 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C127413603 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C2776135927 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C2776229289 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C2776391266 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C2776474195 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C2780248432 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C2780827179 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C512399662 @default.
• W3107120136 hasConceptScore W3107120136C71924100 @default.
• W3107120136 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W3107120136 hasFunder F4320337350 @default.
• W3107120136 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3107120136 hasLocation W31071201361 @default.
• W3107120136 hasLocation W31071201362 @default.
• W3107120136 hasLocation W31071201363 @default.
• W3107120136 hasOpenAccess W3107120136 @default.
• W3107120136 hasPrimaryLocation W31071201361 @default.
• W3107120136 hasRelatedWork W1009099543 @default.
• W3107120136 hasRelatedWork W2018198869 @default.
• W3107120136 hasRelatedWork W2231490479 @default.

• next