FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3107862303> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3107862303 abstract "Over the past years much knowledge has been developed on the functional aspects of integrated people-centred health services, such as information exchange, digitalization and e-health, organizational interventions and funding. However, to further develop integrated people-centred health services delivery and to transform health systems, we need to take a broader perspective and at the same time dive deeper into our understanding. In addition to the functional dimension, we also need an understanding of the normative aspects that drive change and contribute to integration. In order to gain more insight into this human factor, it is relevant to look at the values playing a role in integrated people-centred health services. Values are important, because they underpin stakeholder behavior, interaction and decision-making in integrated people-centred health services delivery. A framework of values provides a vocabulary to explore what matters most to the different stakeholders, and may form a frame of reference on which collaborating partners can build their joint efforts. In the ‘European Framework for Action on Integrated Health Services Delivery’ and the interim report ‘Global strategy on people-centred and integrated health services’ (WHO, 2015; WHO, 2016) the World Health Organization stresses the need for a unifying values framework for integrated people-centred health services. This study contributes to the further development and refinement of such a framework, and provides insight into the different viewpoints of stakeholders on values. A systematically developed list of values is used to investigate the value priorities of stakeholders in integrated people-centred health services delivery across the European region. Our identification of value priorities is based on a quantitative study, assessing an 18-item set of values developed through a systematic review and Delphi consensus study. European service users and informal carers, health professionals, policy and decision makers, and researchers in integrated people-centred health services were invited to participate in an online questionnaire. First, the importance of each value was assessed with a 1-9 scale (‘highly unimportant’-‘highly important’). Second, respondents had to choose their three most important values out of the set of 18. In order to construct scores that reflect their importance, mean scores and interquartile ranges for each value were calculated. In order to investigate differences between stakeholder groups and European regions, multiple statistical tests were carried out (e.g. binary logistic regression, Cramer’s V, Chi-square, Spearman’s Rho). Participants were offered the opportunity to add additional values that they may have missed. For these values qualitative thematic analysis was conducted. Lastly, a principal components factor analysis (PCA - Oblimin with Kaiser Normalization) was conducted to investigate relationships between or among the eighteen values. In total, 1,013 respondents from 42 European countries completed the survey. The number of respondents varied between both stakeholder groups (16% users and informal caregivers; 29% professionals; 28% policy and decision makers; 27% researchers) and European regions (25% Western Europe; 38% Northern Europe; 30% Southern Europe; 8% Eastern Europe). On the 1-9 scale, scores varied between 7.6 (value ‘Transparently shared’) and 8.6 (value ‘Co-ordinated’). When looking at the selection of the three most important values, the values ‘Person-centered’, ‘Co-ordinated’, and ‘Holistic’ were selected most. ‘Flexible’, ‘Transparently shared’ and ‘Reciprocal’ were selected least often. The key conclusions of this study are: 1. The importance of the full set of 18 values was confirmed across stakeholder groups and European regions 2. Three core values were particularly prioritized across stakeholder groups and European regions: ‘Person-centered’, ‘Co-ordinated’ and ‘Holistic’ 4 3. Service users and informal carers attach a significantly higher priority to the values ‘Trustful’, ‘Respectful’ and ‘Co-produced’ than other stakeholder groups. 4. Professionals attach a significantly higher priority to the value ‘Collaborative’ than other stakeholder groups 5. Policy and decision makers attach a significantly higher priority to the values ‘Co-ordinated’, ‘Shared responsibility and accountability’ and ‘Led by whole systems thinking’ than other stakeholder groups 6. Significant differences for six values were found across European regions: ‘Collaborative’, ‘Co-produced’, ‘Efficient’, ‘Led by whole systems thinking’, ‘Holistic’ and ‘Shared responsibility and accountability’ 7. The eighteen values can be clustered into two subgroups which we labeled as 1) people related and 2) governance and organization The conclusions of this study show that, although proposed values are seen as important by all respondents, there are also significant differences in the prioritization of these values across stakeholder groups and EU regions. Furthermore, within the full set of values, a distinction in emphasis can be made. We identified two complementary subgroups and labeled them as ‘people related’ and ‘governance and organization’ values. For practice this implies that it is relevant to take a broader perspective and have eye for different value orientations and prioritizations in integrated people-centred health services delivery. Our study demonstrates that, although overarching intentions and shared goals may be the same (such as integrated people-centred care) different value hierarchies of people - related to their role - are present. This is important, whereas underlying values often remain implicit in collaborative efforts for integrated people-centred health services settings, but do have impact in the success of the realization of integrated people-centred health services delivery. This report provides suggestions for tools and future activities contributing to the awareness of values and values-driven approaches in integrated people-centred health services settings, tailored to different audiences and target groups. Further expansion of this research to other parts of the world is recommended." @default.
• W3107862303 created "2020-12-07" @default.
• W3107862303 creator A5020109477 @default.
• W3107862303 creator A5043675892 @default.
• W3107862303 creator A5056533474 @default.
• W3107862303 creator A5062328388 @default.
• W3107862303 date "2020-11-25" @default.
• W3107862303 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3107862303 title "Values-Driven Integrated People-Centred Health Services: Exploring the Perspectives of Stakeholders Across European Regions" @default.
• W3107862303 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3107862303 type Work @default.
• W3107862303 sameAs 3107862303 @default.
• W3107862303 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3107862303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3107862303 hasAuthorship W3107862303A5020109477 @default.
• W3107862303 hasAuthorship W3107862303A5043675892 @default.
• W3107862303 hasAuthorship W3107862303A5056533474 @default.
• W3107862303 hasAuthorship W3107862303A5062328388 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConcept C201305675 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConceptScore W3107862303C144133560 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConceptScore W3107862303C17744445 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConceptScore W3107862303C201305675 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConceptScore W3107862303C39549134 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConceptScore W3107862303C41008148 @default.
• W3107862303 hasConceptScore W3107862303C56739046 @default.
• W3107862303 hasOpenAccess W3107862303 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W1499044482 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W1968234681 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W1989905368 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2006752676 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2018468595 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2323970754 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2346275569 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2625796957 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2787178891 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2790709822 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2896613790 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2967457741 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3015633480 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3039060271 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3133081523 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3154245114 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3168358648 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3196372538 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W3197992758 @default.
• W3107862303 hasRelatedWork W2129882711 @default.
• W3107862303 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3107862303 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3107862303 magId "3107862303" @default.
• W3107862303 workType "article" @default.