Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3108658309> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3108658309 endingPage "1563" @default.
- W3108658309 startingPage "1557" @default.
- W3108658309 abstract "OBJECTIVE: To compare the mid- and long-term outcomes of patients receiving mitral valve replacement through robotically assisted and conventional median sternotomy approach METHODS: The data of 47 patients who underwent da Vinci robotic mitral valve replacement in our hospital between January, 2007 and December, 2015 were collected retrospectively (robotic group) From a total of 286 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement through the median thoracotomy approach between March, 2002 and June, 2014, 47 patients were selected as the median sternotomy group for matching with the robotic group at a 1:1 ratio The perioperative data and follow-up data of the patients were collected, and the quality of life (QOL) of the patients at 30 days and 6 months was evaluated using the Quality of Life Short Form Survey (SF-12) The time of returning to work postoperatively and the patients' satisfaction with the surgical incision were compared between the two groups RESULTS: All the patients in both groups completed mitral valve replacement successfully, and no death occurred during the operation In the robotic group, only one patient experienced postoperative complication (pleural effusion);in median sternotomy group, one patient received a secondary thoracotomy for management of bleeding resulting from excessive postoperative drainage, and one patient died of septic shock after the operation The volume of postoperative drainage, postoperative monitoring time, ventilation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly smaller or shorter in the robotic group than in the thoracotomy group (P < 0 05) There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups Assessment of the patients at 30 days after the operation showed a better quality of life in the robotic group, but the difference between the two groups tended to diminish at 6 months The patients in the robotic group reported significantly better satisfaction with the incision than those in the thoracotomy group (P < 0 001) At 6 months after the operation, the patients in the robotic group showed significantly faster recovery of work and daily activities than those in the thoracotomy group CONCLUSIONS: Robotically assisted mitral valve replacement is safe and reliable Compared with the median sternotomy approach, the robotic approach is less invasive and promotes faster postoperative recovery of the patients, who have better satisfaction with the quality of life and wound recovery" @default.
- W3108658309 created "2020-12-07" @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5000970532 @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5004483141 @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5011645302 @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5020507222 @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5053830900 @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5053962812 @default.
- W3108658309 creator A5075975467 @default.
- W3108658309 date "2020-11-30" @default.
- W3108658309 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W3108658309 title "[Comparison of quality of life and long-term outcomes following mitral valve replacement through robotically assisted versus median sternotomy approach]" @default.
- W3108658309 cites W1189841743 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W1531045273 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W1876890254 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W1980294811 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W1981912247 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W1990966961 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2009654793 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2087677378 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2109949671 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2113890396 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2131706026 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2148022320 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2281660806 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2309383893 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2374351425 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2414221325 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2527818948 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2566359130 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2596979176 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2794490018 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2800633305 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2920056161 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2920708717 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2921283706 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2945599792 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W2961736284 @default.
- W3108658309 cites W3015578202 @default.
- W3108658309 doi "https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.11.04" @default.
- W3108658309 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7704380" @default.
- W3108658309 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33243731" @default.
- W3108658309 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3108658309 type Work @default.
- W3108658309 sameAs 3108658309 @default.
- W3108658309 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W3108658309 countsByYear W31086583092022 @default.
- W3108658309 countsByYear W31086583092023 @default.
- W3108658309 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5000970532 @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5004483141 @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5011645302 @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5020507222 @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5053830900 @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5053962812 @default.
- W3108658309 hasAuthorship W3108658309A5075975467 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C2775854548 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C2777080012 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C2777543888 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C2778847313 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C2779526774 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C2779951463 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C31174226 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C141071460 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C159110408 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C2775854548 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C2777080012 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C2777543888 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C2778847313 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C2779526774 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C2779951463 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C31174226 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C42219234 @default.
- W3108658309 hasConceptScore W3108658309C71924100 @default.
- W3108658309 hasIssue "11" @default.
- W3108658309 hasLocation W31086583091 @default.
- W3108658309 hasOpenAccess W3108658309 @default.
- W3108658309 hasPrimaryLocation W31086583091 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W1444488784 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W1919929349 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2002117124 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2356700663 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2383583640 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2418630687 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2507391111 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2563970198 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2595718837 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2639585742 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2791073427 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2793967469 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2884899654 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2967018727 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2971599397 @default.
- W3108658309 hasRelatedWork W2995666772 @default.