SemOpenAlex |

SemOpenAlex

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3109720223> ?p ?o ?g. }

Showing items 1 to 95 of 95 with 100 items per page.

W3109720223 endingPage "1049" @default.
W3109720223 startingPage "1044" @default.
W3109720223 abstract "We are in the midst of a massive return-to-work phenomenon not seen in our lifetime. Thirty million people in the United States have been out of work for months, and with states working toward economic recovery, workers are or will be returning in large numbers over a condensed time period. Industries with high physical demands are opening first, including construction, agriculture, food service, manufacturing, and wholesale and retail trade. Although our attention is rightly on medical management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and preventing the spread of infection, there is a silent threat for which we are largely unprepared: post-COVID work disability. We ignore the risks of work disability at our peril. Health care providers need to understand the health implications of reopening beyond a potential increase in cases and spread of infection. Effectively addressing the threat of work disability will require a wider focus to include consideration of biological, psychological, and socioenvironmental factors. The Vermont Retaining Employment and Talent after Injury/Illness Network (VT RETAIN) initiative is a federally funded state project that provides assistance to providers, employers, and individuals to support stay at work/return to work (SAW/RTW) and reduce work disability in the state of Vermont.1 VT RETAIN leadership comprises a broad spectrum of clinical, academic, employment, wellness, and government experts. With the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic, the group was charged with finding innovative ways to holistically address the urgent issue of RTW during the pandemic. In this article, we describe a practical clinical framework for assessing readiness to RTW during the pandemic. This framework uses an occupational medicine approach. Occupational medicine specializes in protecting the health and productivity of workers, controlling workplace hazards, promoting workplace safety, preventing occupational injuries and illnesses, and managing disability. Occupational medicine providers are trained to optimize safe and timely RTW after an injury or illness as well as to manage crisis situations. These occupational medicine roles are particularly important during a pandemic in order to prepare for and minimize widespread health and economic impact.2, 3 We begin by reviewing the general issue of work disability and the basics of the RTW assessment and process. We then discuss the specific challenges of RTW in the current pandemic. Next, we discuss interventions from a pandemic-specific standpoint. Finally, we conclude with useful tools for clinicians and employers to use as they navigate through these challenges. Before the 2020 global pandemic, 8.4 million Americans received Social Security disability benefits as disabled workers.4 Internationally, an estimated 470 million of the worldʼs working-age people have a disability,5 and the unemployment rate among persons with disabilities is estimated to be 80% to 90% in developing countries and 50% to 70% in industrialized countries.6 When people cannot find work, they are deprived not only of economic resources. Unemployment is an important independent risk factor for adverse physical and mental health outcomes, such as cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease, depression, suicide, and increased health care use, both for the unemployed person and their family.7, 8 On a population level, increased unemployment correlates with decreased overall health.9 Given the importance of work for health, attention to work disability is an obligation for all clinicians, especially for those in rehabilitation fields. Yet clinicians typically receive little to no training in the basic best practices that will help their patients stay at or return to work after an injury, illness, or job loss.10 Thus, providers at the front line of RTW decisions may not recognize these risks and may not have the tools to address them. Work disability can arise from work itself or from non-work-related physical or mental health conditions. When work is limited because of any type of health problem, clinicians must recognize the urgency. In addition to the adverse health effects associated with being unemployed, prolonged time out of work can result in other issues that interfere with RTW or put workers at risk during reentry into the workforce. Worsening mental health problems, new or increased domestic abuse, and increasing alcohol or drug consumption may not be apparent and can pose important barriers to RTW and potential workplace safety issues.11-13 New or worsening medical conditions or physical deconditioning relative to work requirements also may become barriers to work or increase the risk of injury upon return to the workplace. The first and most important step in promptly preventing work disability is for the clinician is to understand whether there is a risk of work disability. A model advanced by Armstrong et al14 and consistent with the World Health Organizationʼs International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health15 involves integrating knowledge of the work, the disease, and the worker, with increasing sophistication needed for more complex situations. In many cases, work requirements are straightforward and easily understood by the clinician. When conversation with the patient does not elucidate work tasks, obtaining a job description may be helpful, although many job descriptions lack functional information. In this case, calling upon other professionals such as an ergonomist or occupational or physical therapist can better define the work requirements. Similarly, the clinician often understands the limitations placed on the worker by the disease or injury. Sometimes, though, it may be necessary to consult with a specialist who understands the functional sequelae of a particular disorder (eg, cardiology for heart disease, psychiatry for mental health limitations, or occupational medicine or physiatry for multifactorial impairments, etc.). Consultation with other disciplines such as physical and occupational therapy can provide targeted functional information. If medically safe for the patient and their coworkers, often testing work ability via a trial of modified work (eg, limited hours or modified duty such as lifting limits, position changes, rest breaks, or restricting certain aggravating activities) is useful. When lack of clarity persists, a formal test of work capacity may help assess workers' capabilities relative to the demands of their job. A guiding principle for clinicians and patients is that work releases should be considered medical prescriptions but also dynamic, and they are most effective when updated promptly to respond to changes in the trajectory of the health condition. The workers themselves are the third component of the model. Motivation, goals, knowledge, personality, training, litigation, finances, alternative job skills, family support, relationship to the employer and coworkers, time on the job, nearness to retirement, and other psychosocial factors are often more important predictors of success than either the job or the illness.16, 17 With an understanding of the job, the illness or injury, and the individual, the clinician can intervene to prevent work disability.18 At the most fundamental level, this involves providing education and reassurance that work is a goal, then planning RTW with the worker, and finally communicating these plans to the employer. In more complex cases, a rehabilitation plan is needed. This may involve a single discipline—a counselor or physical therapist, for example. Increasingly complex cases may involve specialist input or a multidisciplinary team approach. The unemployment rate skyrocketed during the early months of the pandemic from 3.8% to 13.8% by the end of May 2020, with leisure and hospitality industries being most affected.19 In addition to the negative consequences of unemployment described previously, the pandemic presents further health challenges for workers. Beyond job loss, pandemic conditions are contributing to an increase in mental health symptoms, substance use, and domestic violence.20-23 Moreover, many people have experienced barriers to physical activity and exercise while sheltering at home or social distancing, compounding the issue of deconditioning.24 Although some may have developed COVID-19 itself and its potentially complex and poorly defined sequelae, many more workers have risk factors for severe infection or live with people who are at high risk. Anxiety and fear avoidance of COVID exposure at the workplace may affect anyone regardless of occupational duty, and work disability from new and preexisting disorders may be prolonged by superimposed workplace stress and RTW anxiety. These issues also can complicate RTW after work-related injuries, and in some states, COVID infection from an occupational exposure or anxiety about workplace COVID exposure can be compensable. Furthermore, a diagnosis of COVID-19 infection is associated with increased incidence of psychiatric diagnosis.25 All of this has occurred in a setting of reduced access to health care, loss of income, social isolation, and increased responsibilities at home. Meanwhile, jobs have been redesigned during the shutdown, leading to potential new health and safety risks, including workers being less familiar with their job tasks or workflow. Finally, the impact of job loss on health insurance during the pandemic is a huge downstream risk that must be taken into account.26 Recent evidence that the development of pandemic-related workplace mental health symptoms is modifiable is encouraging; factors associated with severe psychiatric workplace symptoms include presence of physical symptoms, poor physical health, and viewing RTW as a health hazard, whereas practice of psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures in the workplace such as hand hygiene, wearing face masks, workplace hygiene, and employer concern for health and safety were associated with less severe psychiatric symptoms.27 Thus, although medical providers may be accustomed to writing a work note for an individual worker at the end of a treatment visit, the population-level increase in unemployment, pandemic conditions, and associated changes in health status and risk requires a new proactive clinical approach that integrates work disability assessment and intervention into the visit. Employers need to prepare for the challenges of RTW, and workers need to be sure they have rational RTW strategies. Health care providers should think of themselves as partners in the reopening process and be able to proactively support employer and worker RTW planning. This includes screening for a broad range of physical and mental health issues that may arise during the pandemic and could affect ability to work, as well as determining work ability compared to job requirements. We believe that these steps are feasible and will substantially decrease morbidity and mortality associated with unemployment and reduce disability from work. First, patients' job status should be assessed. Patients should be respected as the experts on what they do for work. Providers should ask about their patients' employment status during the pandemic and if they have any concerns about their job. Next, providers should screen for new medical problems and risk factors that could affect their patients' ability to work. In addition to COVID risk factors, screening should include questions about physical health, physical conditioning, mental health and stress, substance use, abuse, family care responsibilities, any changes to existing conditions, and any other concerns they have identified about their health and work. A simple screening questionnaire like the one in Table 1 can help clinicians identify potential health-job mismatch. ☐ Employed ☐ Furloughed ☐ Unemployed When this screening process identifies a health–job mismatch, clinicians should make a plan to address the problems and provide guidance on work capacity. Specific mismatches and potential interventions are illustrated in Table 2. Clinicians should arrange diagnostic tests and treatment, rehabilitation to improve function, and job accommodations to support employment with a sense of urgency, as delayed return to safe work has substantial negative consequences as described previously. Asking patients about barriers and the support they need can help identify underlying issues and inform steps for RTW. When determining work capacity, consider the physical, emotional, and cognitive requirements; exposure risks; and changes to job tasks to determine if a patient needs new or adjusted job accommodations. When writing job accommodations, focus on what patients can do, not what they cannot do. Starting slowly with reduced hours or limited job tasks and building up to full work can help patients adjust, recondition, and reduce their risk of injury or increases in symptoms. QUESTION 16, 17, or 18: If my patient has increased care responsibilities, lack of safe transportation to work, or feels unsafe at home These can be hidden barriers to return to work: Management of work disability, like management of the many other disabling conditions that clinicians see, requires a team. Colleagues in occupational medicine, physical medicine and rehabilitation, physical therapy, occupational therapy, behavioral health, and other rehabilitation fields can help with treatment and RTW planning. State departments of labor, vocational rehabilitation, health, and mental health and employer assistance programs are good resources for providers and patients. If a provider feels a patient is physically or emotionally unsafe to work despite appropriate treatment, rehabilitation, and job accommodations, the patient should be promptly connected with social support resources. Learning these critical work disability prevention skills may seem secondary or burdensome at a time when front-line clinicians are experiencing new levels of stress and disruption to their own work. Yet, as businesses reopen, providers who understand the relationship between health and work will be protecting their patients' health and livelihood. When we return our patients safely to work, we are saving lives too. The authors would like to acknowledge Mary Helen Bentley, MSW, LICSW, David V. Dent, DO, MPH, Christine Geiler, Mary Guyette, RN, MS, ACNS-BC, Sarah J. Merlo, JD, J. Stephen Monahan, and Kara Peterik, MPH for their contribution to this work." @default.
W3109720223 created "2020-12-07" @default.
W3109720223 creator A5021176669 @default.
W3109720223 creator A5026997931 @default.
W3109720223 creator A5050705032 @default.
W3109720223 creator A5051047099 @default.
W3109720223 creator A5082907300 @default.
W3109720223 date "2021-01-05" @default.
W3109720223 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
W3109720223 title "Return to Work in the Pandemic ‐ Considerations beyond Infection" @default.
W3109720223 cites W2003307443 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2011628133 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2038973887 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2100901931 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2134829115 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2290701979 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2311354366 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2484546033 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2872073776 @default.
W3109720223 cites W2883140711 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3015658132 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3020153107 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3024881498 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3025653141 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3029330941 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3032165507 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3045963717 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3048791385 @default.
W3109720223 cites W3095092064 @default.
W3109720223 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12528" @default.
W3109720223 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7753585" @default.
W3109720223 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33251667" @default.
W3109720223 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
W3109720223 type Work @default.
W3109720223 sameAs 3109720223 @default.
W3109720223 citedByCount "2" @default.
W3109720223 countsByYear W31097202232022 @default.
W3109720223 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
W3109720223 hasAuthorship W3109720223A5021176669 @default.
W3109720223 hasAuthorship W3109720223A5026997931 @default.
W3109720223 hasAuthorship W3109720223A5050705032 @default.
W3109720223 hasAuthorship W3109720223A5051047099 @default.
W3109720223 hasAuthorship W3109720223A5082907300 @default.
W3109720223 hasBestOaLocation W31097202231 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C116675565 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C3006700255 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C3007834351 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C3008058167 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C524204448 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
W3109720223 hasConcept C89623803 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C116675565 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C127413603 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C142724271 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C159047783 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C18762648 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C2779134260 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C3006700255 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C3007834351 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C3008058167 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C524204448 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C71924100 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C78519656 @default.
W3109720223 hasConceptScore W3109720223C89623803 @default.
W3109720223 hasFunder F4320306129 @default.
W3109720223 hasIssue "9" @default.
W3109720223 hasLocation W31097202231 @default.
W3109720223 hasLocation W31097202232 @default.
W3109720223 hasLocation W31097202233 @default.
W3109720223 hasLocation W31097202234 @default.
W3109720223 hasOpenAccess W3109720223 @default.
W3109720223 hasPrimaryLocation W31097202231 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3017171836 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3025176011 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3027835066 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3032320397 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3033635008 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3152606407 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W4280491013 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W4308017287 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3107152225 @default.
W3109720223 hasRelatedWork W3183300108 @default.
W3109720223 hasVolume "13" @default.
W3109720223 isParatext "false" @default.
W3109720223 isRetracted "false" @default.
W3109720223 magId "3109720223" @default.
W3109720223 workType "article" @default.