FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3109905586> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3109905586 endingPage "194" @default.
• W3109905586 startingPage "187" @default.
• W3109905586 abstract "OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONSDesigning sustainable cyclic work requires attention to both the workload amplitude as well as the duty cycle, the fraction of the work cycle with active workload, that therefore also defines the recovery phase of the cycle. A number of different approaches and models have been developed to calculate the required recovery time for a given load and duty cycle. We present a comparison of three types of models at the breakpoint that defines the boundary of load amplitude and duty cycle where fatigue begins to accumulate faster than recovery allows within the work cycle. This comparison shows considerable variation between models of the allowable load or duty cycle depending on the method used. Practitioners should thus be cautious applying these models indiscriminately in job design as their results can vary substantially. In particular, differences between the tasks used for model formulation and application may compromise validity, and model application in a given context should be verified before broad application.TECHNICAL ABSTRACTRationale: There is a need for tools to help design sustainable work in which muscular capacity and other human resources can recover at least as quickly as they are used. Purpose: In this brief report, three different approaches presented in the literature to determining work-rest schedules in cyclic work are compared. Methods: First, a set of five different muscular endurance models coupled with a recovery time model were considered, both with and without a dynamic work correction factor. Second, we examined a model of “resumption time”, and third a psychophysically-based model of maximum duty cycle was included. These models were compared using the concept of a “breakpoint” in fatigue accumulation—the point at which a given load amplitude and duty cycle combination begins to cause accumulation of fatigue in each cycle and from which there is inadequate time to recover. Results: While the five endurance time models all behaved similarly, both with and without the static-to-dynamic correction factor applied, the three different types of modeling approaches provided substantially different response patterns. The psychophysically based model provided the most protective guideline among the models compared. Conclusion: These models should be applied with caution to particular work scenarios. Further research is needed to test accuracy and effectiveness when applying such models to a range of task scenarios to establish safe workloads and loading times in the design of repetitive work." @default.
• W3109905586 created "2020-12-07" @default.
• W3109905586 creator A5064103489 @default.
• W3109905586 creator A5068470028 @default.
• W3109905586 creator A5088411759 @default.
• W3109905586 date "2020-10-01" @default.
• W3109905586 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W3109905586 title "A comparison of work-rest models using a “breakpoint” analysis raises questions" @default.
• W3109905586 cites W1983131173 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W1986187554 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2005118853 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2011051245 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2040563284 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2045663551 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2051622763 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2058899488 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2061117297 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2066440709 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2090707422 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2130938925 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2133578627 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2154828301 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2161168281 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2167759793 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2330726455 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2412763061 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2784296016 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2808771292 @default.
• W3109905586 cites W2969981005 @default.
• W3109905586 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2020.1857315" @default.
• W3109905586 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33259272" @default.
• W3109905586 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3109905586 type Work @default.
• W3109905586 sameAs 3109905586 @default.
• W3109905586 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3109905586 countsByYear W31099055862023 @default.
• W3109905586 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3109905586 hasAuthorship W3109905586A5064103489 @default.
• W3109905586 hasAuthorship W3109905586A5068470028 @default.
• W3109905586 hasAuthorship W3109905586A5088411759 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C13736549 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C149629883 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C165801399 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C185798385 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C18762648 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C199822604 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C111919701 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C119599485 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C127413603 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C13280743 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C13736549 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C149629883 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C151730666 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C165801399 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C177264268 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C178790620 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C185592680 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C185798385 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C18762648 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C199360897 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C199822604 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C200601418 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C201995342 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C205649164 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C2778476105 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C2779343474 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C2780451532 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C41008148 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C42475967 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C44154836 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C78519656 @default.
• W3109905586 hasConceptScore W3109905586C86803240 @default.
• W3109905586 hasFunder F4320334593 @default.
• W3109905586 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3109905586 hasLocation W31099055861 @default.
• W3109905586 hasLocation W31099055862 @default.
• W3109905586 hasOpenAccess W3109905586 @default.
• W3109905586 hasPrimaryLocation W31099055861 @default.

• next