Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3109920346> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3109920346 endingPage "192" @default.
- W3109920346 startingPage "169" @default.
- W3109920346 abstract "Extended Abstract Abstract Psychopath management, as a form of ineffective leadership, can have a negative impact on reputation and its organizational antecedents. There fore the purpose of this paper is to examine how Psychopath management indirectly through the manifestation of abusive supervision and the decline of social responsibility undermine corporates reputation. The research is applied in terms of purpose and in terms of data collection is descriptive correlational. To collect the research data, standard questionnaires of Corporate psychopathy of Mathieu etal (2014), abusive supervision of Tepper (2000), social responsibility of Lii & Lee (2012) and organizational reputation of Welch & Beatty (2009) were used. The statistical population of the study consisted of all employees of the companies operating in the metal industries of Kerman, whom 350 of them were selected by simple random sampling. Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability were used to confirm the reliability of the questionnaires, which was higher than 0.7 for all four questionnaires. The values obtained for convergent validity also indicated the validity of the questionnaires. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling using PLS software. The findings indicate that with the presence of psychopath managers, the rate of abusive supervisory behaviors increases and the level of employees perceived social responsibility decreases. Also, Although there was no direct relationship between Psychopath management and organizational reputation, there is evidence to suggest that Psychopath management indirectly affects corporate reputation through the manifestation of abusive supervision and a decrease in the level of social responsibility. Introduction Corporate reputation is defined as the overall evaluation of stakeholders from images created through the activities, communications, and symbolic behavior of the company over time (Gotsi & Wilson, 2001).Corporate reputation is a unique resource that can create positive financial performance and provide a competitive advantage (Weng & Chen, 2017). In this regard, it is important to note that although the company's reputation has grown over the years, it can in the very short term be destroyed by ineffective management and in addition to direct costs, it may also lead to a decline in the market value of stocks (Linthicum etal. ., 2010). In other words, resolving disputes over the cost of accepting social responsibility, safety, and care, despite their impact on improving company reputation (Aksak etal., 2016), may be unilaterally resolved individually by tyrannical, cruel, and immoral managers such as psychopaths who are likely to be in high positions Compared to front-line managers (Boddy, 2012). Therefore, this study aimed to focus on the relationship between the behavior of business leaders with the psychological characteristics of psychopath individuals. While the behavior and policies of individuals and in particular psychopath managers may seem to be in line with organizational aspirations for success, but at the expense of ethical and spiritual issues, they may also have undesirable consequences, such as the decline of reputation and social responsibility of the organization (Gudmundsson & Southey, 2011). Therefore, the present study attempted to investigate the potential consequences of the presence of psychopath managers on corporate reputation through abusive supervisory behaviors and corporate social irresponsibility. In the following, the literature review of research and development of hypotheses are presented. Case study The statistical population of the study consisted of all employees of the companies operating in the metal industries of Kerman, whom 350 of them were selected by simple random sampling. Materials and Methods The present study is applied in term of purpose and is descriptive-correlational in terms of data collection. Participants rated their supervisors' psychotic attributes with the corporate psychopath scale proposed by Mathieu et al., 2014.Also for measuring other research constructs, abusive leadership questionnaire (Tepper, 2000), social responsibility questionnaire (Lii & Lee, 2012) and organizational reputation questionnaire (Walsh & Beaty, 2009) were used. Content validity and construct validity were used to assess the validity of the questionnaire. Also, for each construct, two indices of average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) were calculated respectively to measure construct validity and reliability. Finally, data were analyzed by SPSS 19 software as well as PLS 2 and LISREL 8.8 soft wares. Discussion and Results Based on the evidence, it can be concluded that the direct relationship between all variables of research, except the relationship between psychopath management with organizational reputation is significant. Also, the evidence suggests that the absolute value of the Sobel test, respectively, to explain the mediating role of abusive supervision in the relationship between psychopath attributes of management with organizational reputation and the mediating role of corporate social responsibility between psychopath management with organizational reputation It is greater than 1.96 (equal to 2.48 and 3.16). Thus, it can be argued that the presence of psychopath management is gradually eroding the company's reputation foundations through the manifestation of abusive supervisory behaviors and the decline in perception of corporate social responsibility by employees. Conclusion The results of present study showed that there is a significant relationship between the psychotic properties of management and abusive supervision. The results of the data obtained from the respondents confirm that fear, abuse and bullying can be mentioned as obvious traits of psychopath managers in the present study. Evidence also shows that with the presence of psychopath management, all components of social responsibility construct have shown a significant turn in the negative direction. Further, the results showed that abusive supervision was associated with decline in organizational reputation. Finally, the results indicate that although the psychotic properties of management did not directly influence organizational reputation decline, But the evidence confirms the influence of psychotic characteristics of management on organizational reputation through the mediating variables abusive supervision and corporate social responsibility." @default.
- W3109920346 created "2020-12-07" @default.
- W3109920346 creator A5075444688 @default.
- W3109920346 date "2020-08-22" @default.
- W3109920346 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3109920346 title "Relationship between Psychopath Management and Organizational Reputation with Mediating of Abusive Supervision and Social Responsibility" @default.
- W3109920346 cites W1688573003 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W1894384502 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W1895280493 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W1985328089 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W1992969921 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W1996054797 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2001305763 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2016422603 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2018596048 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2030859200 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2035195074 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2046207080 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2046794655 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2048989278 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2056898956 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2061823472 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2073693860 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2087091855 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2093748479 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2097003477 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2118020648 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2134954018 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2155955242 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2157253205 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2185780092 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2190249762 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2323847778 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2324663806 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2484792462 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2501596042 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2529286690 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2532971250 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2596273733 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W2891981410 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W3123246857 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W3123970308 @default.
- W3109920346 cites W763544263 @default.
- W3109920346 doi "https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2020.24631.3905" @default.
- W3109920346 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3109920346 type Work @default.
- W3109920346 sameAs 3109920346 @default.
- W3109920346 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3109920346 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3109920346 hasAuthorship W3109920346A5075444688 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C187288502 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C48798503 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C521466935 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C71104824 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C105795698 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C106906290 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C144024400 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C15744967 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C171606756 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C187288502 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C33923547 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C36289849 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C48798503 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C521466935 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C70410870 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C71104824 @default.
- W3109920346 hasConceptScore W3109920346C77805123 @default.
- W3109920346 hasIssue "48" @default.
- W3109920346 hasLocation W31099203461 @default.
- W3109920346 hasOpenAccess W3109920346 @default.
- W3109920346 hasPrimaryLocation W31099203461 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2024675554 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2083352127 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2097003477 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2188323043 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2373821895 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2539556869 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2773656260 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2785056785 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2899260875 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2910851656 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W295294318 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W2980743335 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W3009797901 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W3121274593 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W3127753081 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W3135265045 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W3178832462 @default.
- W3109920346 hasRelatedWork W3205840587 @default.