FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3110543451> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3110543451 endingPage "e00470" @default.
• W3110543451 startingPage "e00470" @default.
• W3110543451 abstract "The issue of progressive collapse of two real-scale frame buildings examples (three and six stories) constructed from High-Strength Concrete (HSC with fc` =75 MPa) and Normal-Strength Concrete (NSC with fc` =32 MPa) under central column removal have been studied using numerical analysis. Initially, a finite element linear static analysis was carried out. Next, linear dynamic and non-linear dynamic analyses were conducted to account for the extreme dynamic effects that arise during central column removal. The values of Demand-Capacity Ratios are considered in each analysis. The results showed that, the analysis of progressive collapse under central column removal of three and six stories frame buildings constructed from HSC is approximately similar to that of the same structures constructed with NSC. The three stories building constructed from NSC and HSC would not be susceptible to collapse for linear statically central column removal, while the situation is reversed for both NSC and HSC six stories buildings. NSC and HSC three and six stories buildings would be susceptible to progressive collapse for linear and nonlinear dynamic central column removal. The ratio between the maximum nonlinear dynamic displacement and the maximum linear dynamic displacement for NSC and HSC three stories buildings at the column removal are 1.17 and 1.18, respectively, whereas these ratios become 1.89 and 1.86 for NSC and HSC six stories building, respectively. The internal forces at the most critical sections for NSC and HSC three story building in the case of linear dynamic analysis are larger than that of linear static analysis by about 58% and 39%, respectively, while for six story building these ratios become 82% and 80%, respectively. For the case of nonlinear dynamic analysis, these ratios for NSC and HSC three story building are larger than that of linear dynamic analysis by about 9% and 7%, respectively, while for six story building these ratios become 11 % and 8%, respectively due to activation of plastic hinges." @default.
• W3110543451 created "2020-12-07" @default.
• W3110543451 creator A5022007907 @default.
• W3110543451 creator A5083641516 @default.
• W3110543451 date "2020-12-01" @default.
• W3110543451 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3110543451 title "Dynamic analysis of high-strength concrete frame buildings for progressive collapse" @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2060647604 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2065554967 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2073539484 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2077512846 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2097977913 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2130586337 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2443076933 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2584500893 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2796481167 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2800073553 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W2903491939 @default.
• W3110543451 cites W3117591162 @default.
• W3110543451 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00470" @default.
• W3110543451 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3110543451 type Work @default.
• W3110543451 sameAs 3110543451 @default.
• W3110543451 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3110543451 countsByYear W31105434512021 @default.
• W3110543451 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3110543451 hasAuthorship W3110543451A5022007907 @default.
• W3110543451 hasAuthorship W3110543451A5083641516 @default.
• W3110543451 hasBestOaLocation W31105434511 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C107551265 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C126042441 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C13355873 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C158622935 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C2780185282 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C2780551164 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C2988805333 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C107551265 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C121332964 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C126042441 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C127413603 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C13355873 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C15744967 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C158622935 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C2780185282 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C2780551164 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C2988805333 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C542102704 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C62520636 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C66938386 @default.
• W3110543451 hasConceptScore W3110543451C76155785 @default.
• W3110543451 hasLocation W31105434511 @default.
• W3110543451 hasLocation W31105434512 @default.
• W3110543451 hasOpenAccess W3110543451 @default.
• W3110543451 hasPrimaryLocation W31105434511 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W1040605963 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W1605153352 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W2184325839 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W2244349094 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W2624727533 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W2744826406 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W2890468888 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W3000570294 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W4206834410 @default.
• W3110543451 hasRelatedWork W4383648042 @default.
• W3110543451 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W3110543451 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3110543451 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3110543451 magId "3110543451" @default.
• W3110543451 workType "article" @default.