Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3111320126> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3111320126 endingPage "100293" @default.
- W3111320126 startingPage "100293" @default.
- W3111320126 abstract "BackgroundThe Relative Citation Ratio is a novel bibliometric tool that quantifies the impact of research articles. The objectives of this study were to identify the 100 obstetrics and gynecology articles with the highest relative citation ratios, evaluate how characteristics of these articles changed over time, and compare characteristics of these articles with top-cited obstetrics and gynecology articles.ObjectiveWe undertook a cross-sectional bibliometric study to examine the 100 obstetrics and gynecology articles with the highest relative citation ratios and the top 100 cited articles in the National Institutes of Health Open Citations Collection from 1980 to 2019.Study DesignWe identified every obstetrics and gynecology article published from 1980 to 2019 that was indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citations Collection. The top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios and the top 100 cited articles were selected for further review. Each article was evaluated using metrics of influence, translation, and other characteristics. We compared the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios published from 1980 to 1999 versus 2000 to 2019 and characteristics of the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios versus the top 100 top-cited articles (after excluding those on both lists). Means, standard deviations, and mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Associations were expressed as relative risks (95% confidence interval).ResultsA total of 323,673 obstetrics and gynecology articles were published between 1980 and 2019. Among the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios, most were observational studies (36%), reviews (26%), and consensus statements (21%). There were only 5 randomized clinical trials. Compared with the articles with the highest relative citation ratios published from 1980 to 1999, articles published from 2000 to 2019 were more likely about benign gynecology (relative risks, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–2.8) and less likely about gynecology-oncology (relative risks, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.2–1.9) and urogynecology (relative risks, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.1–3.3). The articles after 2000 were more likely about systematic reviews (relative risks, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–58.3) and consensus statements (relative risks, 5.1; 95% confidence intervals, 1.6–16.3) and were published as open access articles (relative risks, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9–2.0). There were 60 articles in common between the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios and the top 100 cited articles. Compared with articles that were top cited (after excluding articles on both lists), articles with the highest relative citation ratios received fewer mean citations (266.9 [135.3] vs 514.3 [54.6]; mean differences, 247.4; 95% confidence interval, 201.5–293.3) but had higher numbers of citations per year (37.5 [4.1] vs 31.6 [8.1]; mean difference, −5.9; 95% confidence interval, −14.6 to −2.7). Compared with the articles with the highest relative citation ratios, top-cited articles were more likely to address gynecology topics (relative risk, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–2.5), less likely to be randomized clinical trials (relative risk, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.1–3.8), and less likely to be published as open access articles (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.86).ConclusionThe Relative Citation Ratio is a novel bibliometric tool that does not rely on absolute citation rates and provides unique insight into the dissemination of knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology. Nearly half of the influential obstetrics and gynecology articles identified with this metric would not have been recognized as citation classics by conventional bibliometric analysis. The Relative Citation Ratio is a novel bibliometric tool that quantifies the impact of research articles. The objectives of this study were to identify the 100 obstetrics and gynecology articles with the highest relative citation ratios, evaluate how characteristics of these articles changed over time, and compare characteristics of these articles with top-cited obstetrics and gynecology articles. We undertook a cross-sectional bibliometric study to examine the 100 obstetrics and gynecology articles with the highest relative citation ratios and the top 100 cited articles in the National Institutes of Health Open Citations Collection from 1980 to 2019. We identified every obstetrics and gynecology article published from 1980 to 2019 that was indexed in the National Institutes of Health Open Citations Collection. The top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios and the top 100 cited articles were selected for further review. Each article was evaluated using metrics of influence, translation, and other characteristics. We compared the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios published from 1980 to 1999 versus 2000 to 2019 and characteristics of the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios versus the top 100 top-cited articles (after excluding those on both lists). Means, standard deviations, and mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. Associations were expressed as relative risks (95% confidence interval). A total of 323,673 obstetrics and gynecology articles were published between 1980 and 2019. Among the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios, most were observational studies (36%), reviews (26%), and consensus statements (21%). There were only 5 randomized clinical trials. Compared with the articles with the highest relative citation ratios published from 1980 to 1999, articles published from 2000 to 2019 were more likely about benign gynecology (relative risks, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–2.8) and less likely about gynecology-oncology (relative risks, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.2–1.9) and urogynecology (relative risks, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.1–3.3). The articles after 2000 were more likely about systematic reviews (relative risks, 7.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–58.3) and consensus statements (relative risks, 5.1; 95% confidence intervals, 1.6–16.3) and were published as open access articles (relative risks, 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.9–2.0). There were 60 articles in common between the top 100 articles with the highest relative citation ratios and the top 100 cited articles. Compared with articles that were top cited (after excluding articles on both lists), articles with the highest relative citation ratios received fewer mean citations (266.9 [135.3] vs 514.3 [54.6]; mean differences, 247.4; 95% confidence interval, 201.5–293.3) but had higher numbers of citations per year (37.5 [4.1] vs 31.6 [8.1]; mean difference, −5.9; 95% confidence interval, −14.6 to −2.7). Compared with the articles with the highest relative citation ratios, top-cited articles were more likely to address gynecology topics (relative risk, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–2.5), less likely to be randomized clinical trials (relative risk, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.1–3.8), and less likely to be published as open access articles (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.86). The Relative Citation Ratio is a novel bibliometric tool that does not rely on absolute citation rates and provides unique insight into the dissemination of knowledge in obstetrics and gynecology. Nearly half of the influential obstetrics and gynecology articles identified with this metric would not have been recognized as citation classics by conventional bibliometric analysis." @default.
- W3111320126 created "2020-12-21" @default.
- W3111320126 creator A5020783559 @default.
- W3111320126 creator A5024944801 @default.
- W3111320126 creator A5040410192 @default.
- W3111320126 creator A5048633172 @default.
- W3111320126 creator A5050252566 @default.
- W3111320126 date "2021-01-01" @default.
- W3111320126 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W3111320126 title "A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019" @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1483604492 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1502766766 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1552468412 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1572476794 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1608151369 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1810949827 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1860600241 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1964682494 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1964863515 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1968532354 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1968774836 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1968860914 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1969018878 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1971631504 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1973170872 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1973905104 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1975195151 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1978472477 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1980268488 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1983186128 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1985935279 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1989070741 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1990176269 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1994489910 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1994565268 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W1998952411 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2004445999 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2006085701 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2006522274 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2009388851 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2009475908 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2009785563 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2012544935 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2013896394 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2014853645 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2015635389 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2015794890 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2016558284 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2017975056 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2021270230 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2029148378 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2031222466 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2035217519 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2035844407 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2036087634 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2037647348 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2040068497 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2040916628 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2041490610 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2044869180 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2045241738 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2048946213 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2049613783 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2051868855 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2054439472 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2061506872 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2070056897 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2070789376 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2079450135 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2086757750 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2093782142 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2098124125 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2098718880 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2098847030 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2099924208 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2104732966 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2105751875 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2106490849 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2108067228 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2108735651 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2109269254 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2109334201 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2111563482 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2114250987 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2115798190 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2118366474 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2120337742 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2124608202 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2124656409 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2126657029 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2127367027 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2128438887 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2132421508 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2134698048 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2134989837 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2140112227 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2144067971 @default.
- W3111320126 cites W2144171496 @default.