FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3112022012> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3112022012 endingPage "1015" @default.
• W3112022012 startingPage "1005" @default.
• W3112022012 abstract "Background Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard treatment of mid- and low-lying rectal cancer. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection has been suggested as an approach to decrease recurrence and improve survival. Our meta-analysis presented here aimed to review the current outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection and total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. Methods A systematic literature search querying electronic databases was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We reviewed articles that reported the outcomes of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection combined with total mesorectal excision in comparison with total mesorectal excision alone. The main outcome measures were local recurrence, distant metastasis, overall and disease free-survival, and complications. Results This systematic review included 29 studies of 10,646 patients. Of those patients, 39.4% underwent total mesorectal excision with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. The median operation time for the lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was significantly longer than total mesorectal excision alone (360 minutes versus 294.7 minutes, P = .02). Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection + total mesorectal excision was associated with higher odds of overall complications (odds ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.18–1.87, P < .001) and urinary dysfunction (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.21–3.67, P = .008) than total mesorectal excision alone. Both groups had similar rates of male sexual dysfunction (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.94–2.79, P = .08), anastomotic leakage (odds ratio = 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.69–1.93, P = .59), local recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.75–1.25, P = .79), distant metastasis (hazard ratio = 0.96, 95% confidence interval: 0.76–1.2, P = .72), overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.056, 95% confidence interval: 0.98–1.13, P = .13), and disease-free survival (hazard ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval: 0.97–1.07, P = .37). Conclusion Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection was not associated with a significant reduction of recurrence rates or improvement in survival as compared with total mesorectal excision alone; however, LPLND was associated with longer operation time and increased complication rate." @default.
• W3112022012 created "2020-12-21" @default.
• W3112022012 creator A5059019237 @default.
• W3112022012 creator A5062120613 @default.
• W3112022012 creator A5069880659 @default.
• W3112022012 creator A5079611485 @default.
• W3112022012 creator A5090546113 @default.
• W3112022012 date "2021-05-01" @default.
• W3112022012 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W3112022012 title "Outcome of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection with total mesorectal excision in treatment of rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W3112022012 cites W1936709372 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W1985472152 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2005554828 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2009781085 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2016991046 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2017044005 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2017916774 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2031475317 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2039874940 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2050432286 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2058458613 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2078650138 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2080737046 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2101998870 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2132226167 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2169060358 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2273667033 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2315037478 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2418727456 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2419616762 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2498140405 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2530632084 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2580572305 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2591692317 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2605253734 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2757371207 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2783637586 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2791367448 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2825647587 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2896604068 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2899619019 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2969918198 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2971405778 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W2999948278 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W3000319509 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W3003971147 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W3012352842 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W4211133582 @default.
• W3112022012 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W3112022012 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.010" @default.
• W3112022012 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33317903" @default.
• W3112022012 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3112022012 type Work @default.
• W3112022012 sameAs 3112022012 @default.
• W3112022012 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W3112022012 countsByYear W31120220122021 @default.
• W3112022012 countsByYear W31120220122022 @default.
• W3112022012 countsByYear W31120220122023 @default.
• W3112022012 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3112022012 hasAuthorship W3112022012A5059019237 @default.
• W3112022012 hasAuthorship W3112022012A5062120613 @default.
• W3112022012 hasAuthorship W3112022012A5069880659 @default.
• W3112022012 hasAuthorship W3112022012A5079611485 @default.
• W3112022012 hasAuthorship W3112022012A5090546113 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C2775862295 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C2777201421 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C121608353 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C126322002 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C141071460 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C156957248 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C2775862295 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C2777201421 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C2780849966 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C44249647 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C526805850 @default.
• W3112022012 hasConceptScore W3112022012C71924100 @default.
• W3112022012 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W3112022012 hasLocation W31120220121 @default.
• W3112022012 hasOpenAccess W3112022012 @default.
• W3112022012 hasPrimaryLocation W31120220121 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W2043764901 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W2053411225 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W2059370519 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W2065895388 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W2230317500 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W3027162638 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W307917402 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W4296082202 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W4377940980 @default.
• W3112022012 hasRelatedWork W4385323701 @default.

• next