FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3112528090> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3112528090 endingPage "46" @default.
• W3112528090 startingPage "1" @default.
• W3112528090 abstract "Background Popular commentary portrays private liberal arts colleges (LACs) as ensnared within a “death spiral” due to unprecedented enrollment and financial challenges. But, in contrast to ominous predictions, recent evidence suggests strong levels of innovative activity and resilience in the sector, as reflected in the creation and adoption of methods, approaches, and configurations new to these campuses. In periods of rapid change and transition, LAC stakeholders are likely to seek research on how different change-centered strategies enhance or constrain the faculty role and the relationship between shared governance and innovation. Purpose This study focuses on how faculty engage with administrative leaders and professional staff in academic innovation and decision making in LACs. It applies competing theoretical perspectives—the structural-bureaucratic and cultural lenses of analysis—to determine which one best captures the changes taking place on these campuses and to assay broader outcomes associated with using one approach over another. Participants The 43 research participants in this study encompassed faculty members (49%), senior-level administrators (21%), trustees (7%), and professional staff (23%). Research Design This study employed an embedded case study design that was replicated across three LACs, whose innovative activity was on par with national averages in the sector. Data Collection and Analysis Site visits were conducted at each LAC, during which individual interviews were conducted, documentary materials were collected, and field notes were recorded. The analysis included an application of process, values, and pattern coding to examine the relative fit of the structural-bureaucratic and cultural accounts. Findings/Results The results indicated that the faculty role largely concentrated on contributing content and operationalizing details of academic innovation. Although emerging forms of shared governance were carefully designed, they had tenuous connections to the overall innovative capacity of faculty and their campuses. Conclusions/Recommendations The value of the cultural lens of analysis lies in its ability to account for the ways in which interactions and communication among faculty and stakeholders enhances or constrains academic innovation. A cultural perspective also illuminates three broader patterns from the cases to explain (1) the increasing fragmentation between administrators and faculty and within the professoriate, (2) the compartmentalization of academic work vis-à-vis the “unbundling” of faculty roles, and (3) the failure of purely structural recourses to produce innovative change. Because innovation in LACs matters for strategic differentiation and for the contributions of private higher education to the postsecondary system, broader implications for research and policy are discussed." @default.
• W3112528090 created "2020-12-21" @default.
• W3112528090 creator A5017615789 @default.
• W3112528090 creator A5024504971 @default.
• W3112528090 date "2020-08-01" @default.
• W3112528090 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3112528090 title "Structural or Cultural Pathways to Innovative Change? Faculty and Shared Governance in the Liberal Arts College" @default.
• W3112528090 cites W1985419010 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2002162112 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2047673378 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2060762304 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2070371013 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2104562771 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2121544490 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2338667139 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2584750439 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2586617693 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2760095629 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2906151105 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W2907806961 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W3000645840 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4229631775 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4236718146 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4237656585 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4246903364 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4250138137 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4254276530 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4255602684 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4312294935 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4312350258 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4312381907 @default.
• W3112528090 cites W4312742757 @default.
• W3112528090 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200814" @default.
• W3112528090 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3112528090 type Work @default.
• W3112528090 sameAs 3112528090 @default.
• W3112528090 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3112528090 countsByYear W31125280902022 @default.
• W3112528090 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3112528090 hasAuthorship W3112528090A5017615789 @default.
• W3112528090 hasAuthorship W3112528090A5024504971 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C137176749 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C2778849394 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C37413474 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C70789860 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C120912362 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C137176749 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C138885662 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C144024400 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C15744967 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C162324750 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C17744445 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C187736073 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C199539241 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C2778849394 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C37413474 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C39389867 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C39549134 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C41895202 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C51575053 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C70789860 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C77805123 @default.
• W3112528090 hasConceptScore W3112528090C94625758 @default.
• W3112528090 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W3112528090 hasLocation W31125280901 @default.
• W3112528090 hasOpenAccess W3112528090 @default.
• W3112528090 hasPrimaryLocation W31125280901 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W162242721 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2032509429 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2166387521 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2374217650 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W3112528090 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W3194506328 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2648081027 @default.
• W3112528090 hasRelatedWork W2739726428 @default.
• W3112528090 hasVolume "122" @default.
• W3112528090 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3112528090 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3112528090 magId "3112528090" @default.
• W3112528090 workType "article" @default.