FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3113191589> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3113191589 endingPage "272" @default.
• W3113191589 startingPage "265" @default.
• W3113191589 abstract "Background Rapid sequence intubation (RSI), defined as near-simultaneous administration of a sedative and neuromuscular blocking agent, is the most common and successful method of tracheal intubation in the emergency department. However, RSI is sometimes avoided when the physician believes there is a risk of a can't intubate/can't oxygenate scenario or critical hypoxemia because of distorted anatomy or apnea intolerance. Traditionally, topical anesthesia alone or in combination with low-dose sedation are used when physicians deem RSI too risky. Recently, a ketamine-only strategy has been suggested as an alternative approach. Objective We compared first attempt success and complications between ketamine-only, topical anesthesia alone or with low-dose sedation, and RSI approaches. Methods We analyzed registry data from the National Emergency Airway Registry, comprising emergency department intubation data from 25 centers from January 2016 to December 2018. We excluded pediatric patients (<14 years of age), those in cardiac and respiratory arrest, or those with an alternate pharmacologic approach (i.e., neuromuscular blocking agent only or nonketamine sedative alone). We analyzed first attempt intubation success and adverse events across the 3 intubation approaches. We calculated differences in outcomes between the ketamine-only and topical anesthesia groups. Results During the study period, 12,511 of 19,071 intubation encounters met inclusion criteria, including 102 (0.8%) intubated with ketamine alone, 80 (0.6%) who had intubation facilitated by topical anesthesia, and 12,329 (98.5%) who underwent RSI. Unadjusted first attempt success was 61%, 85%, and 90% for the 3 groups, respectively. Hypoxemia (defined as oxygen saturation <90%) occurred in 16%, 13%, and 8% of patients during the first attempt, respectively. At least 1 adverse event occurred in 32%, 19%, and 14% of the courses of intubation for the 3 groups, respectively. In comparing the ketamine-only and topical anesthesia groups, the difference in first pass success was −24% (95% confidence interval −37% to −12%), and the difference in number of cases with ≥1 adverse event was 13% (95% confidence interval 0–25%), both favoring the topical anesthesia group. Conclusion Although sometimes advocated, the ketamine-only intubation approach is uncommon and is associated with lower success and higher complications compared with topical anesthesia and RSI approaches." @default.
• W3113191589 created "2020-12-21" @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5001254660 @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5003846354 @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5010665768 @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5012251011 @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5023310280 @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5028104213 @default.
• W3113191589 creator A5078073780 @default.
• W3113191589 date "2021-03-01" @default.
• W3113191589 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3113191589 title "Success and Complications of the Ketamine-Only Intubation Method in the Emergency Department" @default.
• W3113191589 cites W1949708446 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W1994061462 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W1997309069 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2037668591 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2042893358 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2043929905 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2049972537 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2054982236 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2066458110 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2070975498 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2086208978 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2141663412 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2169793704 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2526564533 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2800664057 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2803538670 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2944007580 @default.
• W3113191589 cites W2987910249 @default.
• W3113191589 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.10.042" @default.
• W3113191589 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33308912" @default.
• W3113191589 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3113191589 type Work @default.
• W3113191589 sameAs 3113191589 @default.
• W3113191589 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3113191589 countsByYear W31131915892021 @default.
• W3113191589 countsByYear W31131915892022 @default.
• W3113191589 countsByYear W31131915892023 @default.
• W3113191589 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5001254660 @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5003846354 @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5010665768 @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5012251011 @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5023310280 @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5028104213 @default.
• W3113191589 hasAuthorship W3113191589A5078073780 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2776277131 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2776779939 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2776814716 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2777602617 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2778716859 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2779676917 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2780724011 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2780795376 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C2781326671 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C42219234 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C118552586 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2776277131 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2776779939 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2776814716 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2777602617 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2778716859 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2779676917 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2780724011 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2780795376 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C2781326671 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C42219234 @default.
• W3113191589 hasConceptScore W3113191589C71924100 @default.
• W3113191589 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3113191589 hasLocation W31131915891 @default.
• W3113191589 hasOpenAccess W3113191589 @default.
• W3113191589 hasPrimaryLocation W31131915891 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W1966421473 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2047257604 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2058968919 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2065394800 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2134102731 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2147884946 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2206036181 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2334604392 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W2807697234 @default.
• W3113191589 hasRelatedWork W3113191589 @default.
• W3113191589 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W3113191589 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3113191589 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3113191589 magId "3113191589" @default.
• W3113191589 workType "article" @default.