FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3113294582> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3113294582 endingPage "824" @default.
• W3113294582 startingPage "812" @default.
• W3113294582 abstract "Abstract Human‐dominated landscapes are being recolonized by large carnivores, thereby increasing conflicts worldwide via predation of livestock and harvested wildlife such as ungulates. Recent meta‐analyses have shown that predator control (hereafter, predator removal) has mixed success in reducing livestock predation. Yet, it is unknown how effective predator removal is in decreasing predation on ungulates due to a lack of quantitative synthesis, despite the long history of implementation in North America. We quantified the demographic responses of ungulate survival and recruitment rates, abundance, and population growth to experimental predator removal and identified the ecological and experimental design factors affecting ungulate responses to predator removal. We conducted a literature review of management and natural experiments to increase ungulate demography finding 52 predator removal experiments and 10 natural experiments from 47 publications. We then conducted a meta‐analysis to determine the overall effect size and factors which increased ungulate demography during predator removal. Lastly, we tested for evidence of publication bias and experimental rigour for these experiments. We found that predator removal in both management and natural experiments increased ungulate demographic responses by 13% (95% CI = 4.1%–23%), yet prediction intervals overlapped with 0 (95% PI = −34% to 93%). Focusing just on management removals, ungulate demographic responses increased only by 7.8% (95% PI = −32% to 72%), indicating that future experiments could have negligible effects. Predator removal in both management and natural experiments was more successful in improving the demography of young (e.g. recruitment ES = 44%, 95% CI = 13%–83%) but equivocal in improving adult survival (ES = 5.4%, 95% CI = −18% to 36%) and ungulate abundance (ES = 13%, 95% CI = −17% to 31%). The low and variable effectiveness of predator removal for ungulate populations might be linked to ungulates' slow life history and the compensatory mortality of carnivores on ungulates, though effects were stronger on endangered prey. We identified the experimental design factors that led to greater uncertainty in ungulate responses to predator removal, including lack of randomization, low replication and short temporal length. Lastly, we found evidence of publication bias, where experiments with poor rigour and negative effects (i.e. reduced ungulate demography following predator removal) were under‐reported. Synthesis and Applications . We recommend future predator removal experiments be conducted with a more rigorous experimental design to overcome these weaknesses, especially for endangered species where predator removal may work more effectively. We suggest that managers attempting to evaluate experimental practices to increase ungulate populations through predator removal could employ an open standards framework akin to the ‘Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation’ framework." @default.
• W3113294582 created "2020-12-21" @default.
• W3113294582 creator A5037314876 @default.
• W3113294582 creator A5053282603 @default.
• W3113294582 date "2020-12-20" @default.
• W3113294582 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3113294582 title "Predator control may not increase ungulate populations in the future: A formal meta‐analysis" @default.
• W3113294582 cites W154477499 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1556374052 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1596405026 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1825558792 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1953108595 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1978170239 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1989136795 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W1996597784 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2010941810 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2015511522 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2027094073 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2035679039 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2037456887 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2063282180 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2063758153 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2079079164 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2089510712 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2092494720 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2094930844 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2096920454 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2098469032 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2104084684 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2104675861 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2106475881 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2115098571 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2121898755 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2129605695 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2131624592 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2131960895 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2134611873 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2136883173 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2139168999 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2140515877 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2141990479 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2142596708 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2143565343 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2146381121 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2155671467 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2156484007 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2158317226 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2160262035 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2163210426 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2167694028 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2175792168 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2176296417 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2329686691 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2555386394 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2607587578 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2613079241 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2618410637 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W2994355118 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W3015224328 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W3022030800 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W3093622868 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W3758453 @default.
• W3113294582 cites W4214559180 @default.
• W3113294582 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13810" @default.
• W3113294582 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3113294582 type Work @default.
• W3113294582 sameAs 3113294582 @default.
• W3113294582 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W3113294582 countsByYear W31132945822021 @default.
• W3113294582 countsByYear W31132945822022 @default.
• W3113294582 countsByYear W31132945822023 @default.
• W3113294582 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3113294582 hasAuthorship W3113294582A5037314876 @default.
• W3113294582 hasAuthorship W3113294582A5053282603 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C112964050 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C166548495 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C173656711 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C188382862 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C2778208748 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C29376679 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConcept C96857902 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C112964050 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C144024400 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C149923435 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C166548495 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C173656711 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C185933670 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C188382862 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C18903297 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C205649164 @default.
• W3113294582 hasConceptScore W3113294582C2778208748 @default.

• next