Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3114648506> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3114648506 endingPage "450" @default.
- W3114648506 startingPage "443" @default.
- W3114648506 abstract "Studies comparing EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) with EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are lacking. We aimed at comparing EUS-FNA with EUS-FNB in terms of Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) estimation capability, cellularity of the samples, and reliability of Ki-67 PI/tumor grading compared with surgical specimens.Patients diagnosed with pNETs on EUS and/or surgical specimens were retrospectively identified. Specimens were re-evaluated to assess Ki-67 PI feasibility, sample cellularity by manual counting, and determination of Ki-67 PI value. Outcomes in the EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB groups were compared. Kendall rank test was used for Ki-67 PI correlation between EUS and surgical specimens. Subgroup analysis including small (≤20 mm), non-functioning pNETs was performed.Three-hundred samples from 292 lesions were evaluated: 69 EUS-FNA cytology and 231 EUS-FNB histology. Ki-67 PI feasibility was similar for EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB (91.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.15), while EUS-FNB performed significantly better in the subgroup of 179 small pNETs (88.2% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.04). Rate of poor cellulated (<500 cells) specimens was equal between EUS-FNA and EUS-FNB. A significant correlation for Ki-67 PI values between EUS and 92 correspondent surgical specimens was found in both groups, but it was stronger with EUS-FNB (tau = 0.626, p < 0.0001 vs. tau = 0.452, p = 0.031). Correct grading estimation was comparable between the two groups (p = 0.482).Our study showed stronger correlation for Ki-67 values between EUS-FNB and surgical specimens, and that EUS-FNB outperformed EUS-FNA in the evaluation of small pNETs. EUS-FNB should become standard of care for grading assessment of suspected pNETs." @default.
- W3114648506 created "2021-01-05" @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5001613999 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5004373604 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5007594153 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5010071655 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5019701848 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5020749934 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5028819527 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5032973047 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5036479202 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5038589084 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5045097776 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5048095559 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5056335013 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5061358420 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5063135890 @default.
- W3114648506 creator A5065560845 @default.
- W3114648506 date "2021-03-01" @default.
- W3114648506 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W3114648506 title "Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors" @default.
- W3114648506 cites W1905773750 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W1983381212 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W1991498414 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2012503933 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2068172346 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2092139134 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2093467790 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2104346631 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2139987305 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2225295951 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2255247641 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2588295537 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2608160487 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2612056763 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2762551988 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2809634530 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2895236757 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2896646967 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2938542029 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2944987730 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2977394896 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W2978874231 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W3017093362 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W3024678472 @default.
- W3114648506 cites W982088167 @default.
- W3114648506 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2020.12.015" @default.
- W3114648506 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33390343" @default.
- W3114648506 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3114648506 type Work @default.
- W3114648506 sameAs 3114648506 @default.
- W3114648506 citedByCount "61" @default.
- W3114648506 countsByYear W31146485062021 @default.
- W3114648506 countsByYear W31146485062022 @default.
- W3114648506 countsByYear W31146485062023 @default.
- W3114648506 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5001613999 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5004373604 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5007594153 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5010071655 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5019701848 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5020749934 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5028819527 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5032973047 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5036479202 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5038589084 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5045097776 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5048095559 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5056335013 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5061358420 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5063135890 @default.
- W3114648506 hasAuthorship W3114648506A5065560845 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C147176958 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C18823058 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C2776170712 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C2777286243 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C2779066768 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C57742111 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C126838900 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C127413603 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C142724271 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C147176958 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C18823058 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C2775934546 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C2776170712 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C2777286243 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C2779066768 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C2989005 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C57742111 @default.
- W3114648506 hasConceptScore W3114648506C71924100 @default.
- W3114648506 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W3114648506 hasLocation W31146485061 @default.