FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3114690949> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3114690949 endingPage "32" @default.
• W3114690949 startingPage "23" @default.
• W3114690949 abstract "Abstract Accurately estimating load distributions and ground responses around underground openings play a significant role in the safety of the operations in underground mines. Adequately designing pillars and other support measures relies highly on the accurate assessment of the loads that will be carried by them, as well as the load-bearing capacities of the supports. There are various methods that can be used to approximate mining-induced loads in stratified rock masses to be used in pillar design. The empirical methods are based on equations derived from large databases of various case studies. They are implemented in government approved design tools and are widely used. There are also analytical and numerical techniques used for more detailed analysis of the induced loads. In this study, two different longwall mines with different panel width-to-depth ratios are analyzed using different methods. The empirical method used in the analysis is the square-decay stress function that uses the abutment angle concept, implemented in pillar design software developed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The first numerical method used in the analysis is a displacement-discontinuity (DD) variation of the boundary element method, LaModel, which utilizes the laminated overburden model. The second numerical method used in the analysis is Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC) with the numerical modeling approach recently developed at West Virginia University which is based on the approach developed by NIOSH. The model includes the 2D slice of a cross-section along the width of the panel with the chain pillar system that also includes the different stratigraphic layers of the overburden. All three methods gave similar results for the shallow mine, both in terms of load percentages and distribution where the variation was more obvious for the deep cover mine. The FLAC3D model was observed to better capture the stress changes observed during the field measurements for both the shallow and deep cover cases. This study allowed us to see the shortcomings of each of these different methods. It was concluded that a numerical model which incorporates the site-specific geology would provide the most precise estimate for complex loading conditions." @default.
• W3114690949 created "2021-01-05" @default.
• W3114690949 creator A5008698702 @default.
• W3114690949 creator A5050070009 @default.
• W3114690949 creator A5081335284 @default.
• W3114690949 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3114690949 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W3114690949 title "Investigating different methods used for approximating pillar loads in longwall coal mines" @default.
• W3114690949 cites W1879613374 @default.
• W3114690949 cites W2772847952 @default.
• W3114690949 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.12.007" @default.
• W3114690949 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3114690949 type Work @default.
• W3114690949 sameAs 3114690949 @default.
• W3114690949 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W3114690949 countsByYear W31146909492021 @default.
• W3114690949 countsByYear W31146909492022 @default.
• W3114690949 countsByYear W31146909492023 @default.
• W3114690949 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3114690949 hasAuthorship W3114690949A5008698702 @default.
• W3114690949 hasAuthorship W3114690949A5050070009 @default.
• W3114690949 hasAuthorship W3114690949A5081335284 @default.
• W3114690949 hasBestOaLocation W31146909491 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C105289051 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C108615695 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C130446744 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C16674752 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C518851703 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C548081761 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConcept C78762247 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C105289051 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C108615695 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C127313418 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C127413603 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C130446744 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C16674752 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C187320778 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C518851703 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C548081761 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C66938386 @default.
• W3114690949 hasConceptScore W3114690949C78762247 @default.
• W3114690949 hasFunder F4320314413 @default.
• W3114690949 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3114690949 hasLocation W31146909491 @default.
• W3114690949 hasOpenAccess W3114690949 @default.
• W3114690949 hasPrimaryLocation W31146909491 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2348783979 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2349982932 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2355552670 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2363480665 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2370794561 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2371988248 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2383189800 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2383214696 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2390479135 @default.
• W3114690949 hasRelatedWork W2998245820 @default.
• W3114690949 hasVolume "31" @default.
• W3114690949 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3114690949 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3114690949 magId "3114690949" @default.
• W3114690949 workType "article" @default.