FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3115326805> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3115326805 endingPage "89" @default.
• W3115326805 startingPage "86" @default.
• W3115326805 abstract "Patients use social media to report on medical care and rate their satisfaction with cosmetic procedures and providers. Currently, there are few studies that examine the satisfaction of nonsurgical rhinoplasty. This study aims to identify variables of patients’ choice and satisfaction of the nonsurgical rhinoplasty procedure through social media reviews. Data were extracted from 420 nonsurgical rhinoplasty reviews from RealSelf.com from March 2017 to April 2020. Recorded variables include patient demographics, price, nasal deficiency, patient-described improvement after injection, and physician characteristics influencing patients’ decision making. Of the data extracted from the reviews, 85% of reviewers were women, with a mean age of 27.4 years (SD, ±8.7 years). Eighty-four percent of reviewers had the procedure performed in the United States (84%). The mean cost was $1074 (SD, ±$733.20; median, $850). The most common patients’ deficiencies for this procedure include a “nasal hump” for 31.2% of reviewers and a “bump or dent” in the nose for 35.1% of reviewers. The procedure outcomes commonly noted were a positive change in “shape” of their nose (66.0%), improved confidence (44.4%), and improvement in profile (34.0%). The predominant reasons reviewers chose their injector were (1) favorable injector demeanor (63%) and (2) ability of the injector to provide emotional reassurance (49%). In all, 95.6% considered nonsurgical rhinoplasty “worth it.” Ninety-five percent of online reviewers stated that nonsurgical rhinoplasty was “worth it,” with an average cost of $1074, minimal post-procedure recovery time, and minimal pain. The most common nasal deficiency includes a bump, a hump, and a crooked shape. The most commonly stated improvement was in the shape of the nose. This demonstrates the utility of nonsurgical rhinoplasty for correction of a wide variety of nasal deficiencies. In the analysis of provider characteristics, the most important aspect was the provider’s demeanor. Patients used words like “warm,” “welcoming,” and “understanding of their desires.” They described feeling “comfortable” with the provider. The most important factor for selecting a provider was the emotional connection between the provider and the patient. Satisfaction of nonsurgical rhinoplasty is high, which corroborates reported satisfaction rates in the literature. Nonsurgical rhinoplasty exhibits significant versatility in the defects it can improve. Many patients chose their provider for their personality and emotional connection formed." @default.
• W3115326805 created "2021-01-05" @default.
• W3115326805 creator A5042455262 @default.
• W3115326805 creator A5053656816 @default.
• W3115326805 creator A5065613577 @default.
• W3115326805 creator A5088762511 @default.
• W3115326805 date "2020-12-23" @default.
• W3115326805 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3115326805 title "Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: A RealSelf Social Media Analysis" @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2033622463 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2080651452 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2178399964 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2482180949 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2612940311 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2790040908 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2806720037 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W2814118455 @default.
• W3115326805 cites W4252685797 @default.
• W3115326805 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0748806820981203" @default.
• W3115326805 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3115326805 type Work @default.
• W3115326805 sameAs 3115326805 @default.
• W3115326805 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3115326805 countsByYear W31153268052021 @default.
• W3115326805 countsByYear W31153268052022 @default.
• W3115326805 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3115326805 hasAuthorship W3115326805A5042455262 @default.
• W3115326805 hasAuthorship W3115326805A5053656816 @default.
• W3115326805 hasAuthorship W3115326805A5065613577 @default.
• W3115326805 hasAuthorship W3115326805A5088762511 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C2776050027 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C2778311950 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C2780084366 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C141071460 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C144024400 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C149923435 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C1862650 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C2775944032 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C2776050027 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C2778311950 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C2780084366 @default.
• W3115326805 hasConceptScore W3115326805C71924100 @default.
• W3115326805 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W3115326805 hasLocation W31153268051 @default.
• W3115326805 hasOpenAccess W3115326805 @default.
• W3115326805 hasPrimaryLocation W31153268051 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W2039745345 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W2049153961 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W2102680954 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W2790040908 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W2899660136 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W2921839391 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W3028024306 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W3092440985 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W3109313720 @default.
• W3115326805 hasRelatedWork W4379615489 @default.
• W3115326805 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W3115326805 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3115326805 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3115326805 magId "3115326805" @default.
• W3115326805 workType "article" @default.