FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3116241502> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3116241502 endingPage "1203" @default.
• W3116241502 startingPage "1199" @default.
• W3116241502 abstract "Objective: To explore the methods of repairing large soft tissue defect with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and the management of secondary wound in donor site. Methods: From June 2015 to June 2019, 30 patients with soft tissue defect caused by various reasons or hyperplastic scar were hospitalized in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, including 10 males and 20 females, aged 25-64 years, with 18 cases of head soft tissue defects caused by the growth and rupture of tumor, 7 cases of hypertrophic scar in trunk and limbs, and 5 cases of facial and neck soft tissue defects caused by trauma. The area of primary wound after debridement or enlarged lesion resection was 14 cm×10 cm-18 cm×16 cm. Preoperative evaluation of 20 patients showed that the wound was relatively large, and the donor site could not be directly closed by suturing after resection of conventional single-lobe latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, so the bilobed latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with area of 14 cm×5 cm-18 cm×8 cm was cut to repair the wound, and the donor site was directly closed by suturing. Preoperative evaluation of 10 patients showed that the donor site could be directly closed by suturing after resection of conventional single-lobe latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap, so that conventional single-lobe latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with area of 11 cm×9 cm-13 cm×10 cm was resected to repair the primary wound, resulting in big tension in donor site and secondary wound with area of 6 cm×4 cm-8 cm×6 cm that couldn't be directly sutured, which was repaired with donor site local flap with area of 7 cm×4 cm-9 cm×6 cm, and the second donor site was directly closed by suturing. Intraoperative end-to-end anastomosis was performed between the thoracodorsal arteries and veins of the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and the arteries and veins of the primary recipient wound. The survival of latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps and local flaps were observed after surgery, and the appearance and function of the donor and recipient areas were observed during follow-up. Results: All the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps and local flaps survived in the patients after surgery. Follow-up of 6-12 months showed that the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap was similar in color to the surrounding normal skin, with soft texture and good elasticity. The donor site of 20 patients repaired with bilobed latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps were only left with linear scars, among which 2 patients had hypertrophic scars and none had functional impairment. The donor site of 10 patients repaired with single-lobe latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps and donor site local flaps had good appearance, left with linear scar, irregular shape, but no local traction or dysfunction. Conclusions: When repairing a large soft tissue defect, the bilobed latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap or the single-lobe latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap combined with the local flap transfer in the donor site can be used after preoperative evaluation so that the donor site wound can be closed at one time while repairing the primary wound. The donor site has less scar, and both the recipient and donor sites have good appearance and function after surgery." @default.
• W3116241502 created "2021-01-05" @default.
• W3116241502 creator A5007564557 @default.
• W3116241502 creator A5012206107 @default.
• W3116241502 creator A5035362071 @default.
• W3116241502 creator A5046942350 @default.
• W3116241502 creator A5064879576 @default.
• W3116241502 date "2020-12-20" @default.
• W3116241502 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3116241502 title "Methods of repairing large soft tissue defect with latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap and management of secondary wound in donor site" @default.
• W3116241502 doi "https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20191121-00439" @default.
• W3116241502 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33379857" @default.
• W3116241502 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3116241502 type Work @default.
• W3116241502 sameAs 3116241502 @default.
• W3116241502 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3116241502 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3116241502 hasAuthorship W3116241502A5007564557 @default.
• W3116241502 hasAuthorship W3116241502A5012206107 @default.
• W3116241502 hasAuthorship W3116241502A5035362071 @default.
• W3116241502 hasAuthorship W3116241502A5046942350 @default.
• W3116241502 hasAuthorship W3116241502A5064879576 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C2777438270 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C2780269544 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C2780552095 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C2781197403 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C136948725 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C141071460 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C18903297 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C2777438270 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C2780269544 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C2780552095 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C2781197403 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C71924100 @default.
• W3116241502 hasConceptScore W3116241502C86803240 @default.
• W3116241502 hasIssue "12" @default.
• W3116241502 hasLocation W31162415021 @default.
• W3116241502 hasOpenAccess W3116241502 @default.
• W3116241502 hasPrimaryLocation W31162415021 @default.
• W3116241502 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W3116241502 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3116241502 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3116241502 magId "3116241502" @default.
• W3116241502 workType "article" @default.