Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3116981162> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W3116981162 endingPage "363" @default.
- W3116981162 startingPage "359" @default.
- W3116981162 abstract "Background: Postoperative rehabilitation protocols after ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction typically involve a structured interval throwing program. In an effort to minimize torque placed on the UCL, athletes are often instructed to throw with a crow hop, even at short throwing distances. However, the effect of the crow hop on medial elbow stress is unknown. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine whether elbow stress differs with and without a crow hop across the throwing distances of a typical interval throwing program. We hypothesized that crow hop throws would generate lower torque on the elbow than standing throws at each distance of the interval throwing program. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Healthy high school and collegiate pitchers and position players were recruited from the surrounding area. Each player was outfitted with a wearable athletic sleeve and device that recorded elbow torque (Newton-meters), arm slot (degrees), arm speed (revolutions per minute), and shoulder rotation (degrees). Ball velocity (miles per hour) was measured using a radar gun. Players were instructed to perform 3 crow hop throws and 3 standing throws at distances of 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 feet. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to compare ball velocity, elbow torque, arm slot, arm speed, and shoulder rotation between crow hop and standing throws at each throwing distance. Results: Twenty athletes participated in this study (average age, 17.8 years; range, 15-25 years). The average medial elbow torque increased at each distance for both crow hop and standing throws at distances of 30, 45, 60, and 90 feet ( P < .05), after which there were no significant increases in elbow torque ( P > .05). The average torque was higher for crow hop throws than standing throws at distances of 30 feet (13.9 N·m vs 12.0 N·m; P = .002), 45 feet (21.8 N·m vs 19.3 N·m; P = .005), and 60 feet (28.0 N·m vs 24.5 N·m; P = .02). Conclusion: Crow hop throws generated greater medial elbow torque than standing throws at distances up to 60 feet; however, there were no differences in elbow torque at distances greater than 60 feet between the 2 throw types. For both crow hop and standing throws, elbow stress increased at each distance interval up to 90 feet before plateauing at distances greater than 90 feet. The crow hop throwing technique does not reduce medial elbow stress during a simulated interval throwing program, and it may actually increase torque at shorter throwing distances. Clinical Relevance: The results of our study indicate that it would be prudent for players to initially perform standing throws at shorter distances and only later be allowed to employ a natural crow hop at greater distances to minimize torque placed on the medial elbow during UCL rehabilitation protocols." @default.
- W3116981162 created "2021-01-05" @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5015559620 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5022069319 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5038294363 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5060057271 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5068466958 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5078008201 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5078606310 @default.
- W3116981162 creator A5087191974 @default.
- W3116981162 date "2020-12-30" @default.
- W3116981162 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
- W3116981162 title "The Effect of the Crow Hop on Elbow Stress During an Interval Throwing Program" @default.
- W3116981162 cites W1977623719 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W1997602353 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2033769386 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2072174257 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2102908976 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2106131667 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2113422619 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2127545711 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2172073285 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2199929124 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2294897915 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2555915309 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2616424649 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2740794034 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2762806684 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2778718016 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2783371931 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2794263527 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2801403109 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2802188637 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2810925101 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2890376449 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2906146556 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2906904354 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2911878044 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2947149242 @default.
- W3116981162 cites W2971915488 @default.
- W3116981162 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520976629" @default.
- W3116981162 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33378223" @default.
- W3116981162 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3116981162 type Work @default.
- W3116981162 sameAs 3116981162 @default.
- W3116981162 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W3116981162 countsByYear W31169811622021 @default.
- W3116981162 countsByYear W31169811622022 @default.
- W3116981162 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5015559620 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5022069319 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5038294363 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5060057271 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5068466958 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5078008201 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5078606310 @default.
- W3116981162 hasAuthorship W3116981162A5087191974 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C144171764 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C178802073 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C207451115 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C2781184374 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C121332964 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C127413603 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C141071460 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C144171764 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C178802073 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C1862650 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C207451115 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C2781184374 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C60465272 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C71924100 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C97355855 @default.
- W3116981162 hasConceptScore W3116981162C99508421 @default.
- W3116981162 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W3116981162 hasLocation W31169811621 @default.
- W3116981162 hasOpenAccess W3116981162 @default.
- W3116981162 hasPrimaryLocation W31169811621 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W10261341 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W14645903 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W15717754 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W1648797 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W18944456 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W20956983 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W21700371 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W2831283 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W4258322 @default.
- W3116981162 hasRelatedWork W534730 @default.
- W3116981162 hasVolume "49" @default.
- W3116981162 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3116981162 isRetracted "false" @default.