Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3117061815> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 71 of
71
with 100 items per page.
- W3117061815 endingPage "131" @default.
- W3117061815 startingPage "110" @default.
- W3117061815 abstract "The article is devoted to legal argumentation, namely to its research by rhetorical approach. The aim of the article is to determine characteristic features of rhetorical approach to legal argumentation.Rhetorical approach to the research of legal argumentation should include philosophical, theoretical, empirical components. Philosophical component of legal argumentation research consists in the anthropological conception of rationality i.e. the philosophical axiomatic idea about rationality of legal argumentation if in is acknowledged by the members of legal community.Rhetorical theoretical model of legal argumentation ensures persuasion of legal audience via legal argumentation. Rhetorical approach deals with legal argumentation mainly in the “context of discovery”, i.e. with legal arguing. Rhetorical approach to legal arguing implies specific standard of soundness of the argumentation – persuasion standard. Empirical component of legal argumentation includes description of arguments and persuasive techniques. Rhetorical approach insures interaction between natural law and positive law.Rhetorical approach to legal argumentation lets us assume some ontological issues concerning legal argumentation. Legal argumentation is considered as the mode of impact on the audience via application of communicative and interactional means which persuasive force depends on the contextof argumentative legal discourse. Legal argumentation is the result of such impact embodied in the system of arguments to persuade the legal audience in the arguability of the standpoint." @default.
- W3117061815 created "2021-01-05" @default.
- W3117061815 creator A5014190430 @default.
- W3117061815 date "2020-12-15" @default.
- W3117061815 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W3117061815 title "Rhetorical Approach to Legal Arguing and Legal Argumentation" @default.
- W3117061815 cites W1488505771 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W1539618770 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W1558751900 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W1564062619 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W1587380778 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W2006961223 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W2081195645 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W2499237221 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W570953749 @default.
- W3117061815 cites W650096817 @default.
- W3117061815 doi "https://doi.org/10.21564/2227-7153.2020.1.219055" @default.
- W3117061815 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
- W3117061815 type Work @default.
- W3117061815 sameAs 3117061815 @default.
- W3117061815 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3117061815 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3117061815 hasAuthorship W3117061815A5014190430 @default.
- W3117061815 hasBestOaLocation W31170618151 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C192562157 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C201717286 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C2781306805 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C2781310500 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C62291451 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C65059942 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C111472728 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C138885662 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C144024400 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C15744967 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C17744445 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C192562157 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C201717286 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C2781306805 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C2781310500 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C41895202 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C62291451 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C65059942 @default.
- W3117061815 hasConceptScore W3117061815C77805123 @default.
- W3117061815 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3117061815 hasLocation W31170618151 @default.
- W3117061815 hasOpenAccess W3117061815 @default.
- W3117061815 hasPrimaryLocation W31170618151 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W2022335117 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W2082524143 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W2087212164 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W2798542046 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W2878573333 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W3010918093 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W3117061815 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W3182421346 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W961033205 @default.
- W3117061815 hasRelatedWork W3092544798 @default.
- W3117061815 hasVolume "0" @default.
- W3117061815 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3117061815 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3117061815 magId "3117061815" @default.
- W3117061815 workType "article" @default.