FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3117711216> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3117711216 endingPage "158" @default.
• W3117711216 startingPage "133" @default.
• W3117711216 abstract "Purpose The concept of information security culture, which recently gained increased attention, aims to comprehensively grasp socio-cultural mechanisms that have an impact on organizational security. Different measurement instruments have been developed to measure and assess information security culture using survey-based tools. However, the content, breadth and face validity of these scales vary greatly. This study aims to identify and provide an overview of the scales that are used to measure information security culture and to evaluate the rigor of reported scale development and validation procedures. Design/methodology/approach Papers that introduce a new or adapt an existing scale of information security culture were systematically reviewed to evaluate scales of information security culture. A standard search strategy was applied to identify 19 relevant scales, which were evaluated based on the framework of 16 criteria pertaining to the rigor of reported operationalization and the reported validity and reliability of the identified scales. Findings The results show that the rigor with which scales of information security culture are validated varies greatly and that none of the scales meet all the evaluation criteria. Moreover, most of the studies provide somewhat limited evidence of the validation of scales, indicating room for further improvement. Particularly, critical issues seem to be the lack of evidence regarding discriminant and criterion validity and incomplete documentation of the operationalization process. Research limitations/implications Researchers focusing on the human factor in information security need to reach a certain level of agreement on the essential elements of the concept of information security culture. Future studies need to build on existing scales, address their limitations and gain further evidence regarding the validity of scales of information security culture. Further research should also investigate the quality of definitions and make expert assessments of the content fit between concepts and items. Practical implications Organizations that aim to assess the level of information security culture among employees can use the results of this systematic review to support the selection of an adequate measurement scale. However, caution is needed for scales that provide limited evidence of validation. Originality/value This is the first study that offers a critical evaluation of existing scales of information security culture. The results have decision-making value for researchers who intend to conduct survey-based examinations of information security culture." @default.
• W3117711216 created "2021-01-05" @default.
• W3117711216 creator A5075316810 @default.
• W3117711216 creator A5078624786 @default.
• W3117711216 date "2020-12-04" @default.
• W3117711216 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3117711216 title "A systematic review of scales for measuring information security culture" @default.
• W3117711216 cites W1982884571 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W1989210507 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W1992342542 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2005501262 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2008556210 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2025451090 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2029699977 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2049214960 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2076538849 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2082765746 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2088489410 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2096409691 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2096812562 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2118769530 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2124431800 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2125608113 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2129748849 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2183877827 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2256804265 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2300663785 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2337005109 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2340721291 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2565717183 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2612808361 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2624860278 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2786705330 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2895033590 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2896123190 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W2916190332 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W3022903699 @default.
• W3117711216 cites W4235678817 @default.
• W3117711216 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/ics-12-2019-0140" @default.
• W3117711216 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3117711216 type Work @default.
• W3117711216 sameAs 3117711216 @default.
• W3117711216 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3117711216 countsByYear W31177112162021 @default.
• W3117711216 countsByYear W31177112162022 @default.
• W3117711216 countsByYear W31177112162023 @default.
• W3117711216 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3117711216 hasAuthorship W3117711216A5075316810 @default.
• W3117711216 hasAuthorship W3117711216A5078624786 @default.
• W3117711216 hasBestOaLocation W31177112161 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C117110713 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C120107772 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C171268870 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C29983905 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C3018868096 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C33191230 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C47309137 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C527648132 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C56666940 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C58916136 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConcept C9354725 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C111472728 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C117110713 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C120107772 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C121332964 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C127413603 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C138885662 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C15744967 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C171268870 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C171606756 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C199360897 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C2522767166 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C2778755073 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C29983905 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C3018868096 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C33191230 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C38652104 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C41008148 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C47309137 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C527648132 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C539667460 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C56666940 @default.
• W3117711216 hasConceptScore W3117711216C56739046 @default.

• next