FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3118363014> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3118363014 endingPage "248" @default.
• W3118363014 startingPage "248" @default.
• W3118363014 abstract "Objectives Healthcare professionals need to take into account their knowledge, skills and attitudes to develop a focused clinical question, perform an effective search of the literature, critically appraise the evidence, and apply to the clinical context and evaluate the effectiveness of the process. To date, there is a lack of consensus on evidence-based medicine (EBM) curriculum for undergraduate healthcare students in Brazil. The aim of this study was to develop a consensus on EBM curriculum contents for healthcare schools in Brazil considering expert opinion. Design Modified three-round Delphi methodology. Setting Online survey. Participants The expert panel was composed of 40 healthcare professionals from different specialties. Most of the participants (n=24; 60%) were female with the age between 30 and 44 years. Participants were also experts in the field of epidemiology, biostatistics or public health. The mean experience of experts in teaching EBM was 9.5 years. Main outcome measures An online questionnaire consisting of 89 items related to EBM was sent to the experts. The experts ranked each item of EBM curriculum considering the importance of each item as omitted, mentioned, explained or practised. The last section of the questionnaire was composed of ‘additional content’ where the experts evaluated only if an item should be included or not, the form of offering the EBM contents and the total workload (in hours/semester). Open-ended questions were present in each section to give the opportunity to experts to insert suggestions. Items that reached values greater than or equal to 70% of agreement among experts was considered definitive for the curriculum. Items between 51% and 69% of agreement were included for the next round and those items with less than or equal to 50% of agreement were considered unnecessary and were excluded. In the third round, the EBM contents were classified according to the degree of consensus as follow: strong (≥70% of agreement), moderate (51%–69% of agreement) and weak (50% of agreement) based on the maximum consensus reached. Results Of the 89 initial contents, 32 (35.9%) reached a strong degree of consensus, 23 (25.8%) moderate degree of consensus, two (2.2%) weak degree of consensus and 35 items were not recommended (≤50% of agreement). The workload suggested by experts should be between 61 and 90 hour/semester and an EBM curriculum should be offered with epidemiology and biostatistics as prerequisites. Regarding the importance of each item, 29 (72.5%) should be explained and 25 (27.5%) should be practised with exercises. Conclusions The consensus on an EBM curriculum for Brazilian healthcare schools consists of 54 items. This EBM curriculum also presents the degree of consensus (strong, moderate and weak), the importance of each item (mentioned, explained and practised with exercises). A total workload of between 60 and 90 hours per semester was suggested and the EBM curriculum should be offered with epidemiology and biostatistics as prerequisites, but also EBM contents should be included within other disciplines throughout the entire undergraduate course." @default.
• W3118363014 created "2021-01-18" @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5002598741 @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5015040150 @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5046378367 @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5052804009 @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5055450087 @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5086872629 @default.
• W3118363014 creator A5087939829 @default.
• W3118363014 date "2021-01-13" @default.
• W3118363014 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W3118363014 title "Consensus on evidence-based medicine curriculum contents for healthcare schools in Brazil" @default.
• W3118363014 cites W1698487503 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W1833191675 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W1852330046 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W1994784352 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2010445119 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2017265038 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2018184319 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2022425641 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2039906750 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2046313151 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2063240798 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2068605525 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2076478879 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2094091720 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2101655917 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2104581289 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2106952837 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2113819810 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2133523467 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2142149055 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2158382122 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2264397108 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2522935423 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2587777701 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2605593475 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2607426695 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2809361269 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2809806543 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2885545888 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2885661935 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2910388605 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W2950827272 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W3047773556 @default.
• W3118363014 cites W4255373161 @default.
• W3118363014 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111397" @default.
• W3118363014 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33441472" @default.
• W3118363014 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3118363014 type Work @default.
• W3118363014 sameAs 3118363014 @default.
• W3118363014 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3118363014 countsByYear W31183630142021 @default.
• W3118363014 countsByYear W31183630142022 @default.
• W3118363014 countsByYear W31183630142023 @default.
• W3118363014 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5002598741 @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5015040150 @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5046378367 @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5052804009 @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5055450087 @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5086872629 @default.
• W3118363014 hasAuthorship W3118363014A5087939829 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C19648533 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C2778476105 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C60641444 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C65067816 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C111919701 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C142724271 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C144133560 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C151730666 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C154945302 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C15744967 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C159110408 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C160735492 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C162853370 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C17744445 @default.
• W3118363014 hasConceptScore W3118363014C19417346 @default.

• next