FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3118750144> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3118750144 endingPage "425" @default.
• W3118750144 startingPage "417" @default.
• W3118750144 abstract "To systematically evaluate the patellofemoral joint design of medial pivot prosthesis, which incorporates a variety of patella-friendly design features, by comparing clinical and radiographic results with another prosthesis.All consecutive patients who underwent unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with medial pivot prosthesis (Group MP, 126 cases) between September 2016 and April 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. For each patient reviewed, a control patient was matched, according to age, gender, side, body mass index (BMI), preoperative range of motion (ROM), and operating period, who had received primary unilateral TKA with a conventional posterior-stabilized prosthesis at the same period as the study group (Group PS, 126 cases). All patients underwent at least 1-year follow-up. At the preoperative and final follow-up periods, data on the Knee Society Score (KSS) score, WOMAC score, Kujala score, and ROM were collected. Merchant views were taken with the knee flexion at 30°, 60°, and 90° to measure patella shift and tilt. Preoperative posterior condylar angle (PCA) was also measured. Postoperative complications, including anterior knee pain, maltracking, patellar clunk or crepitus (PCC), were evaluated.There were no significant differences in the demographics or clinical characteristics between the two groups. No statistically significant difference was identified in the KSS total score, including knee score and function score, or in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between the two groups after the operation. We found statistically significant differences in the postoperative Kujala scores and the ROMs between the two groups. The mean Kujala score in group MP was better than in group PS (MP 77.16 ± 3.80 vs PS 75.97 ± 4.06, P < 0.05), while the ROM in group PS was significantly higher than in group MP (MP 122.24° ± 4.45° vs PS 123.78° ± 6.05°, P < 0.05). Simultaneously, the preoperative/postoperative Kujala score improvement in group MP was observed to be significantly larger than in group PS (MP 27.82 ± 5.31 vs PS 26.17 ± 4.89, P < 0.05), but the average ROM improvement in group PS was significantly greater than in group MP (MP 19.00° ±9.90° vs PS 21.57° ± 9.62°). In the 90° Merchant view, the mean patella tilt of group MP was statistically smaller than that of group PS (MP 4.21° ± 1.62° vs PS 4.74° ± 1.95°, P < 0.05), and the average patella tilt change in group MP was significantly greater than in group PS (MP -3.8° ± 1.43° vs PS -3.23° ± 1.33°, P < 0.05). Preoperative PCA did not show significant differences between the two groups. Two cases of PCC and three cases of anterior knee pain were noted in group MP, and nine cases and six cases, respectively, were observed in group PS. The incidence of PCC was significantly lower in group MP (1.6% vs 7.1%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in follow-up time between the two groups.The medial pivot prosthesis could achieve satisfactory outcomes with better patellofemoral performance attributed to its patella-friendly design characteristics compared to the conventional posterior-stabilized prosthesis." @default.
• W3118750144 created "2021-01-18" @default.
• W3118750144 creator A5016107051 @default.
• W3118750144 creator A5031249980 @default.
• W3118750144 creator A5041958396 @default.
• W3118750144 creator A5052663273 @default.
• W3118750144 creator A5052850223 @default.
• W3118750144 date "2021-01-05" @default.
• W3118750144 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W3118750144 title "Early Patellofemoral Function of Medial Pivot Prostheses Compared with<scp>Posterior‐Stabilized</scp>Prostheses for Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty" @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1568354540 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1701841361 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1871670249 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1967083861 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1975720965 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1976947196 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1977606049 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W1977942529 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2000403809 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2000461852 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2003259852 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2006614300 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2017135879 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2030383498 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2040177284 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2044551586 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2048753296 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2062179785 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2062471533 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2064220188 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2065895838 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2069624221 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2071943496 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2075713676 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2076068634 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2076822266 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2077945722 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2084085508 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2084230600 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2095223053 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2102978034 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2107972624 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2110314483 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2119318770 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2122369004 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2125105906 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2131551135 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2140981545 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2143595552 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2159796923 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2164920867 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2170256174 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2474792672 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2487234540 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2614237147 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2774660156 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W2913122669 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W4297574081 @default.
• W3118750144 cites W614570623 @default.
• W3118750144 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12895" @default.
• W3118750144 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7957395" @default.
• W3118750144 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33403815" @default.
• W3118750144 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3118750144 type Work @default.
• W3118750144 sameAs 3118750144 @default.
• W3118750144 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W3118750144 countsByYear W31187501442021 @default.
• W3118750144 countsByYear W31187501442022 @default.
• W3118750144 countsByYear W31187501442023 @default.
• W3118750144 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3118750144 hasAuthorship W3118750144A5016107051 @default.
• W3118750144 hasAuthorship W3118750144A5031249980 @default.
• W3118750144 hasAuthorship W3118750144A5041958396 @default.
• W3118750144 hasAuthorship W3118750144A5052663273 @default.
• W3118750144 hasAuthorship W3118750144A5052850223 @default.
• W3118750144 hasBestOaLocation W31187501441 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C2776164576 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C2778715743 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C2779286237 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C2780221984 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C2780368125 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C3017871827 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConcept C96646087 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C126322002 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C141071460 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C142724271 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C204787440 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C2776164576 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C2778336525 @default.
• W3118750144 hasConceptScore W3118750144C2778715743 @default.

• next