FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3118804543> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3118804543 endingPage "e21819" @default.
• W3118804543 startingPage "e21819" @default.
• W3118804543 abstract "Background Peer support is an approach to cope with mental illness, and technology provides a way to facilitate peer support. However, there are barriers to seeking support in offline and technology-mediated contexts. Objective This study aims to uncover potential ways to design digital mental health peer support systems and to outline a set of principles for future designers to consider as they embark on designing these systems. By learning how existing systems are used by people in daily life and by centering their experiences, we can better understand how to design mental health peer support technologies that foreground people’s needs. One existing digital peer support system is Buddy Project, the case study in this paper. Methods This paper reports on an interview study with Buddy Project users (N=13). Data were analyzed using the constant comparative approach. Results Individuals matched through Buddy Project developed supportive friendships with one another, leading them to become each other’s peer supporters in their respective journeys. It was not only the mental health peer support that was important to participants but also being able to connect over other parts of their lives and identities. The design of Buddy Project provided a sense of anonymity and separation from pre-existing ties, making it easier for participants to disclose struggles; moreover, the pairs appreciated being able to browse each other’s social media pages before connecting. Buddy Project has an explicit mission to prevent suicide and demonstrates this mission across its online platforms, which helps reduce the stigma around mental health within the peer support space. Pairs were matched based on shared interests and identities. This choice aided the pairs in developing meaningful, compatible, and supportive relationships with each other, where they felt seen and understood. However, the pairs were concerned that matching based on a shared mental health diagnosis may lead to sharing unhealthy coping mechanisms or comparing themselves and the severity of their experiences with their peers. Conclusions The results of this study shed light on desirable features of a digital mental health peer support system: matching peers based on interests and identities that they self-identify with; having an explicit mental health–related mission coupled with social media and other web-based presences to signal that discussing mental health is safe within the peer support ecosystem; and not matching peers based on a broad mental health diagnosis. However, if the diagnosis is important, this matching should account for illness severity and educate peers on how to provide support while avoiding suggesting unhelpful coping mechanisms; allowing for some degree of anonymity and control over how peers present themselves to each other; and providing relevant information and tools to potential peers to help them decide if they would like to embark on a relationship with their matched peer before connecting with them." @default.
• W3118804543 created "2021-01-18" @default.
• W3118804543 creator A5011868083 @default.
• W3118804543 creator A5066291464 @default.
• W3118804543 date "2021-01-04" @default.
• W3118804543 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W3118804543 title "Considerations in Designing Digital Peer Support for Mental Health: Interview Study Among Users of a Digital Support System (Buddy Project)" @default.
• W3118804543 cites W1972904174 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W1977543246 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W1993728090 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W1999434819 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2011608379 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2013669012 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2019549485 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2034957486 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2038312366 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2042093593 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2052755559 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2056770556 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2063786895 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2064569513 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2067801379 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2072657700 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2079523174 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2081553764 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2101259217 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2107198427 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2110472072 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2113849320 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2116293971 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2119797455 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2124715426 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2128559207 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2128900442 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2130616757 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2146414486 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2154690800 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2167299310 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2170656380 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2271006548 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2315849398 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2322774700 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2399480376 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2401100650 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2404805569 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2430437552 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2541037941 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2574692179 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2588050621 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2588888822 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2759691261 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2792686719 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2795668206 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2806313543 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2883917435 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2890051191 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2894631352 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2896957784 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2907283686 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2914974259 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2951900649 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W2989467141 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W3006370585 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W3015151137 @default.
• W3118804543 cites W3033180295 @default.
• W3118804543 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/21819" @default.
• W3118804543 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7813628" @default.
• W3118804543 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33393909" @default.
• W3118804543 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3118804543 type Work @default.
• W3118804543 sameAs 3118804543 @default.
• W3118804543 citedByCount "18" @default.
• W3118804543 countsByYear W31188045432021 @default.
• W3118804543 countsByYear W31188045432022 @default.
• W3118804543 countsByYear W31188045432023 @default.
• W3118804543 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3118804543 hasAuthorship W3118804543A5011868083 @default.
• W3118804543 hasAuthorship W3118804543A5066291464 @default.
• W3118804543 hasBestOaLocation W31188045431 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C108827166 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C134362201 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C178005623 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C2778087770 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C2780433410 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C2781094116 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C518677369 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3118804543 hasConcept C77805123 @default.

• next