Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3119637971> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W3119637971 endingPage "137" @default.
- W3119637971 startingPage "109" @default.
- W3119637971 abstract "In the first part of this paper, the authors present the general theory on analogy, which is first observed as a kind of conclusion and then as a kind of interpretation of law. In the former case, reasoning by analogy is defined as a process of deductive reasoning based on the prior inductive reasoning. In the latter case, the authors present different standpoints of the general legal theory on the statutory and legal analogy. With regards to the debate on the position of analogy in the theory of law, the authors point out to the theoretical standpoint of the Pandectists that analogy is a process which is half way between the interpretation of law in the strict sense and the act of creating the law. The first part of the paper also contains an elaboration on the contradictory standpoints on the existence of legal gaps, which are closely related to the authors' opinion that the concept of analogy in law has always been associated with and served as an instrument for filling in the legal gaps. In the central part of the paper, the authors provide a comprehensive discussion on the admissibility of analogy in the substantive criminal law. Relying upon the detailed analysis of their mutual relations, the authors conclude that the principle of legality determines the limits of admissibility and application of analogy in criminal law. On these grounds, the authors draw a conclusion that the legal analogy is always prohibited in the contemporary criminal law because it is in direct contradiction with the principle of legality; on the other hand, the application of statutory analogy shall not be excluded outside the prohibited zone, which is determined by this principle. In particular, the authors focus on the analogy intra legem, which is perceived as a third type of analogy and considered to be an admissible method for interpreting the norms of criminal law. This type of analogy is designated as a method for interpreting legal rules on the basis of similarity, where the specific case is resolved within the given legal framework when the law makes allowances for the argument of similarity. In the third part of the paper the author presents the theoretical concepts referring to the application of analogy in the interpretation of criminal procedural provisions." @default.
- W3119637971 created "2021-01-18" @default.
- W3119637971 creator A5082226411 @default.
- W3119637971 date "2016-01-01" @default.
- W3119637971 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W3119637971 title "Analogy as a method of interpretation of criminal law and criminal procedure" @default.
- W3119637971 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W3119637971 type Work @default.
- W3119637971 sameAs 3119637971 @default.
- W3119637971 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3119637971 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3119637971 hasAuthorship W3119637971A5082226411 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C162040827 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C177986884 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C202565627 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C42027317 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C521332185 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C111472728 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C138885662 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C162040827 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C17744445 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C177986884 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C199539241 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C202565627 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C41895202 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C42027317 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C521332185 @default.
- W3119637971 hasConceptScore W3119637971C527412718 @default.
- W3119637971 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W3119637971 hasLocation W31196379711 @default.
- W3119637971 hasOpenAccess W3119637971 @default.
- W3119637971 hasPrimaryLocation W31196379711 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W108701362 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2256283915 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2348520205 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2354520572 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2364770604 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2368369363 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2372937231 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2378471710 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2502206930 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2522117900 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2595288944 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2757867416 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2950573155 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2950893429 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W2952264184 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W3041569677 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W3111335573 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W3121298706 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W3161219744 @default.
- W3119637971 hasRelatedWork W3097069608 @default.
- W3119637971 hasVolume "7" @default.
- W3119637971 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3119637971 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3119637971 magId "3119637971" @default.
- W3119637971 workType "article" @default.