FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3120135792> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3120135792 endingPage "468" @default.
• W3120135792 startingPage "459" @default.
• W3120135792 abstract "Background : Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has shown its benefits in pregnant women with diabetes. Flash glucose monitoring (FGM), as one of the CGM types, has not been well assessed in this patient group. The interpretation of a big volume of information on glycaemia obtained with various CGM devices is possible with statistical analysis according to the algorithms proposed by manufacturers. While these algorithms cannot be comprehensive, evaluation of alternative approaches to the CGM data statistical analysis and comparison of the results obtained with different devices seem reasonable. No unified algorithm for modification of antidiabetic treatment according to the CGM results has been yet developed. This study was performed in a pregnant patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) to demonstrate the methods to individualized analysis of the data from various devices (CGM, FGM, glucometer) that could be used in routine clinical practice. Aim : To evaluate the individual advantages and disadvantages of the simultaneous use of FGM, CGM and SMBG in a pregnant woman with type 1 diabetes. Materials and methods : This was an observational case study with a retrospective assessment of the patient's data obtained with FGM, CGM and a glucometer in a 31-year female patient with T1DM of 6-year duration and 9 weeks of gestation, who had been on pump insulin therapy for one year and had an HbA1c level of 5.4%. During the study the patient continued her pump therapy and performed blood glucose self-monitoring (BGSM) and simultaneously used FGM and CGM. The following FGM data were compared with CGM and glucometer results: measurement numbers, time in range, mean daily glucose, mean absolute difference (MAD), and mean absolute relative difference (MARD). Results : The FGM-derived mean daily glucose was lower than that measured with the glucometer: 5.1±1.9 mmol/L vs 6.4±2.2 mmol/L (p<0.001). The number of measurements with FGM was 32.0±12.9 times daily and with a glucometer 15.1±5.5 times daily (p<0.001). MAD values were minimal in the hypoglycemic range (0.5±0.3 mmol/L) and maximal in the hyperglycemic range (1.6±1.2 mmol/L, р<0.001). The MARD values were significantly smaller in the hyperglycemic than in the normoglycemic (16.6±12.6% vs 21.3±14.0%, р=0.035). The highest MAD and MARD were observed on the Day 1 of the sensor installation. The comparison of FGM and the glucometer readings with the Clarke consensus error grid showed that 82% of the FGM readings were in zone A or B. The FGM accuracy was higher from Day 2 to Day 9 (72.5% of the FGM readings in zone A). MAD between FGM and CGM readings was not different from that between FGM and the glucometer: 1.3±1.0 mmol/L and 1.2±0.9 mmol/L, respectively (p=0.09). MARD for the FGM and CGM comparison was higher than that for FGM and glucometer comparison: 24.4±23.0% and 18.8±13.5%, respectively (р<0.001). The Pearson's correlation coefficient FGM and CGM seemed lower than that between FGM and the glucometer (0.837 and 0.889, respectively). FGM has identified more hypoglycemic events compared to CGM: time below range was 29.4% and 8.8%, respectively, p<0.001). Conclusion : The FGM readings highly correlate with the glucometer. The FGM difference with the glucometer was lower in the hypo- and hyperglycemic ranges. FGM shows higher values for time below range than CGM. It is necessary to continue the study of the clinical acceptability of FGM in pregnant women and determination of its optimal regimen for the treatment of this patient category, as well as to develop an algorithm for treatment modification based on the results of FGM." @default.
• W3120135792 created "2021-01-18" @default.
• W3120135792 creator A5000242942 @default.
• W3120135792 creator A5009911661 @default.
• W3120135792 creator A5021479165 @default.
• W3120135792 creator A5041626843 @default.
• W3120135792 date "2020-12-31" @default.
• W3120135792 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W3120135792 title "The individualized statistical analysis of the continuous glucose monitoring data" @default.
• W3120135792 cites W1599923190 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W1986495510 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2124082567 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2132278645 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2418644768 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2476254674 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2519526531 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2587847154 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2597477321 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2755734682 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2770616601 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2779314348 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2788883362 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2793128019 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2899696610 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2920088332 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2942185839 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2948261890 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2948847239 @default.
• W3120135792 cites W2995731459 @default.
• W3120135792 doi "https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2020-48-068" @default.
• W3120135792 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3120135792 type Work @default.
• W3120135792 sameAs 3120135792 @default.
• W3120135792 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W3120135792 countsByYear W31201357922021 @default.
• W3120135792 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3120135792 hasAuthorship W3120135792A5000242942 @default.
• W3120135792 hasAuthorship W3120135792A5009911661 @default.
• W3120135792 hasAuthorship W3120135792A5021479165 @default.
• W3120135792 hasAuthorship W3120135792A5041626843 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C23131810 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C2779794567 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C2781232474 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C2986379492 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C2986587452 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C555293320 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C105795698 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C126322002 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C134018914 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C177713679 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C23131810 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C2779794567 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C2781232474 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C2986379492 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C2986587452 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C33923547 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C555293320 @default.
• W3120135792 hasConceptScore W3120135792C71924100 @default.
• W3120135792 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W3120135792 hasLocation W31201357921 @default.
• W3120135792 hasOpenAccess W3120135792 @default.
• W3120135792 hasPrimaryLocation W31201357921 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W2035530611 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W2049370509 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W2098422745 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W2244425631 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W2539105241 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W3098654162 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W4207049476 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W4253353125 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W2793684477 @default.
• W3120135792 hasRelatedWork W3098965542 @default.
• W3120135792 hasVolume "48" @default.
• W3120135792 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3120135792 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3120135792 magId "3120135792" @default.
• W3120135792 workType "article" @default.