FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3120276291> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3120276291 endingPage "29" @default.
• W3120276291 startingPage "24" @default.
• W3120276291 abstract "<h3>PURPOSE</h3> With increasing delays in obtaining a dermatological consultation, general practitioners (GPs) are using social networks for telemedicine to obtain advice on dermatological images. The objective was to analyze diagnostic agreement between telemedicine on social networks (Twitter and MedPics) and standard teledermatology services (TDS). <h3>METHODS</h3> This retrospective observational study included images published on Twitter and MedPics by GPs in 2016. The contextualized images were evaluated by 2 teledermatology services in Paris, France and an expert committee. Diagnoses obtained from telemedicine on social networks, TDS, and the expert committee were collected for each image. The agreement between the diagnoses made on social networks and by TDS was measured using Cohen <i>κ</i> statistic. The number of correct diagnoses obtained using social networks and TDS as determined by agreement with the expert’s diagnoses were compared with <i>χ</i>² tests. <h3>RESULTS</h3> Two hundred and seventy health professionals responded to the 60 selected images from social networks. The main diagnoses, according to the experts were: purpura (8.3%), eczema (6.7%), mycosis (6.7%), and viral infections (6.7%). Diagnostic agreement between telemedicine on social networks and TDS was moderate over the entire set of images (<i>κ</i> = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42-0.68) and good for images containing dermatologist’s answers (<i>κ</i> = 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45-0.85). The number of correct diagnoses was not statistically different between telemedicine on social networks and TDS on all images (60% vs 55%; <i>P</i> = .28) but was higher on social networks when a dermatologist answered (65% vs 55%; <i>P</i> <.01). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Diagnostic agreement using social network images showed that use of this telemedicine tool could be a reliable means to alleviate the difficulties of accessing dermatology consultations although data safety probably needs to be improved." @default.
• W3120276291 created "2021-01-18" @default.
• W3120276291 creator A5029104582 @default.
• W3120276291 creator A5060406192 @default.
• W3120276291 date "2021-01-01" @default.
• W3120276291 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W3120276291 title "Diagnostic Agreement Between Telemedicine on Social Networks and Teledermatology Centers" @default.
• W3120276291 cites W1973568427 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2004409291 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2035959393 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2066958231 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2076685509 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2102269881 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2152280512 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2164777277 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2430419310 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2797597138 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2890300124 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2919759422 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W2972346533 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W3024809568 @default.
• W3120276291 cites W3193108446 @default.
• W3120276291 doi "https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2608" @default.
• W3120276291 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7800733" @default.
• W3120276291 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33431387" @default.
• W3120276291 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3120276291 type Work @default.
• W3120276291 sameAs 3120276291 @default.
• W3120276291 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W3120276291 countsByYear W31202762912021 @default.
• W3120276291 countsByYear W31202762912022 @default.
• W3120276291 countsByYear W31202762912023 @default.
• W3120276291 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3120276291 hasAuthorship W3120276291A5029104582 @default.
• W3120276291 hasAuthorship W3120276291A5060406192 @default.
• W3120276291 hasBestOaLocation W31202762911 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C2776207752 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C534262118 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C142724271 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C160735492 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C162324750 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C2776207752 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C2779891985 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C50522688 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C512399662 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C534262118 @default.
• W3120276291 hasConceptScore W3120276291C71924100 @default.
• W3120276291 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3120276291 hasLocation W31202762911 @default.
• W3120276291 hasLocation W31202762912 @default.
• W3120276291 hasOpenAccess W3120276291 @default.
• W3120276291 hasPrimaryLocation W31202762911 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W1964153126 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W198554137 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W2014402744 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W2027072309 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W2050115096 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W2051363693 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W2081707502 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W2138156914 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W3120276291 @default.
• W3120276291 hasRelatedWork W3169669567 @default.
• W3120276291 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W3120276291 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3120276291 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3120276291 magId "3120276291" @default.
• W3120276291 workType "article" @default.