FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3121164110> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3121164110 startingPage "181" @default.
• W3121164110 abstract "damages have been a controversial aspect of U.S. law; often criticized both at home and abroad. Neither U.S. law on punitive damages nor the foreign climate regarding their reception has remained static. This article notes the continuing legislative attack on punitive damages in the United States at both the state and federal level, and focuses on recent developments in case law and treaty negotiations concerning the reception of punitive damages abroad. The article begins with a brief review of the background against which current punitive damages law in the United States continues to operate, followed by consideration of the continuing evolution of U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence on punitive damages. The Beals case in the Supreme Court of Canada and new uniform Canadian legislation on the enforcement of foreign judgments demonstrate two very different approaches to U.S. punitive damages by foreign courts. The issue is also the focus of Article 11 of the new Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, which offers a much more moderate approach than the Canadian uniform act, which, if widely adopted, would constitute a major step back in terms of predictability in business and judicial relationships. *Professor and Director, Center for International Legal Education, University of Pittsburgh School of Law. 1Ronald A. Brand, Damages and the Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments, 43 NETHERLANDS INT'L L. REV. 143 (1996) [hereinafter Punitive Damages]. Portions of the initial discussion of the current article rely heavily on this early work of the author. 2For a discussion of those negotiations and the failure to reach a comprehensive convention, see Ronald A. Brand, The 1999 Hague Preliminary Draft Convention Text on Jurisdiction and Judgments: A View From the United States, XL RIVISTA DI DIRITTO INTERNATIONALE PRIVATO E PROCESSUAL 31 (2004); Ronald A. Brand, Current Problems, Common Ground, and First Principles: Restructuring the Preliminary Draft Convention Text, in A GLOBAL LAW OF JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS: LESSONS FROM THE HAGUE CONVENTION 75 (John J. Barcelo III and Kevin M. Clermont, eds., 2002). 3See, Ronald A. Brand, A Global Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, 10 ILSA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL & COMPARATIVE LAW 345 (2004). Information on the negotiations can be found on the “work in progress” section of the Hague Conference website at http://hcch.evision.nl. Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments Too Far Ronald A. Brand*" @default.
• W3121164110 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3121164110 creator A5087657518 @default.
• W3121164110 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W3121164110 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W3121164110 title "Punitive Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments Too Far" @default.
• W3121164110 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W3121164110 type Work @default.
• W3121164110 sameAs 3121164110 @default.
• W3121164110 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3121164110 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3121164110 hasAuthorship W3121164110A5087657518 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C2779777834 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C71043370 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConcept C83645499 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C170706310 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C17744445 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C199539241 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C2777381055 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C2778272461 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C2779777834 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C71043370 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C83009810 @default.
• W3121164110 hasConceptScore W3121164110C83645499 @default.
• W3121164110 hasLocation W31211641101 @default.
• W3121164110 hasOpenAccess W3121164110 @default.
• W3121164110 hasPrimaryLocation W31211641101 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W1192896820 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W1482838769 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W1487711880 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W1542969955 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W1599293799 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W1884945318 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W206204387 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W2120878562 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W2146627481 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W2258555676 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W2943267601 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3021502009 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3122554139 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3122891376 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3123868899 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3124565983 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3126143358 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W3126469346 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W544150 @default.
• W3121164110 hasRelatedWork W2157219643 @default.
• W3121164110 hasVolume "24" @default.
• W3121164110 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3121164110 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3121164110 magId "3121164110" @default.
• W3121164110 workType "article" @default.