Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3121463906> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W3121463906 abstract "In my recent essay, Dworkin's Fallacy, or What the Philosophy of Language Can't Teach Us about the Law, 89 Va. L. Rev. 1897 (2003), I argued that a particular confusion between linguistic and legal practices - evident most notably in the work of Ronald Dworkin - causes legal theorists to misderive jurisprudential conclusions from semantic premises. Because much, if not most, jurisprudential interest in the philosophy of language is motivated by Dworkin's fallacy, I argued that the philosophy of language does not generally have jurisprudential consequences. But in the conclusion to my essay I identified three areas where Dworkin's fallacy does not apply and the philosophy of language has genuine, albeit very limited, consequences for the philosophy of law. In his response to this essay (Andrew Halpin, Or, Even, What the Law Can Teach The Philosophy of Language: A Response to Green's Dworkin's Fallacy, 91 Va. L. Rev. 175 (2005)), Halpin argues that I neglected a number of important connections between the two disciplines. But the connections Halpin describes are in fact those that I identified as genuine in the conclusion to my essay. What is more, Halpin appears to agree with me that these connections, although genuine, are very limited, in the sense that they yield few substantive jurisprudential consequences. Halpin sees a disagreement between us on these matters only because he misunderstands the confusion of linguistic and legal practices at issue in Dworkin's fallacy. But Halpin does argue for a connection between the philosophies of language and law that is different from those I entertained in my essay. I was interested in whether the philosophy of language can yield conclusions in the philosophy of law. Halpin appears to agree with me that it cannot. But Halpin argues that the philosophy of law can yield conclusions in the philosophy of language. Although Halpin's argument here is suggestive, it is insufficiently detailed to allow me to come to a firm conclusion about its merits. In my essay I offered Dennis Patterson's legal theory, with Dworkin's, as examples of Dworkin's fallacy in action. Halpin argues that Patterson's theory does not suffer from Dworkin's fallacy. I end my response to Halpin with a defense of my critique of Patterson, by expanding what was admittedly a compressed argument in the original." @default.
- W3121463906 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3121463906 creator A5021463814 @default.
- W3121463906 date "2005-01-01" @default.
- W3121463906 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3121463906 title "Halpin on Dworkin's Fallacy: A Surreply" @default.
- W3121463906 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
- W3121463906 type Work @default.
- W3121463906 sameAs 3121463906 @default.
- W3121463906 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3121463906 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3121463906 hasAuthorship W3121463906A5021463814 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C123556308 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C149209484 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C162040827 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C182744844 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C2781035248 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConcept C2781140086 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C111472728 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C11171543 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C123556308 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C138885662 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C144024400 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C149209484 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C15744967 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C162040827 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C17744445 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C182744844 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C199539241 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C2781035248 @default.
- W3121463906 hasConceptScore W3121463906C2781140086 @default.
- W3121463906 hasLocation W31214639061 @default.
- W3121463906 hasOpenAccess W3121463906 @default.
- W3121463906 hasPrimaryLocation W31214639061 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W1579531029 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W1607476706 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W1866562225 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W1947290623 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2125897534 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2160333404 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2274448252 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2346086233 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2736002476 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2755109304 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2769094277 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2967004124 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2972454143 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W3121932418 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W3122553804 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W3124225598 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W3125424123 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W76020822 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W804501324 @default.
- W3121463906 hasRelatedWork W2136555036 @default.
- W3121463906 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3121463906 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3121463906 magId "3121463906" @default.
- W3121463906 workType "article" @default.