FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3121693565> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3121693565 endingPage "27" @default.
• W3121693565 startingPage "16" @default.
• W3121693565 abstract "In this Essay, I argue that the main cause of the poisonous state of interbranch relations involving the federal judiciary, as of the frequent and strident attacks on courts—federal and state—are strategies calculated to persuade the public that courts are part of ordinary politics and thus that judges are policy agents to be held accountable as such. Although unremarkable in the sense that a breakdown in norms of interdependence is a defining characteristic of contemporary politics, I regard the current situation involving the federal judiciary as remarkably dangerous because of the possibility that a tipping point of no return to the traditional equilibrium in interbranch relations may be reached. That prospect is suggested by the insight that our “tradition of judicial independence” has depended critically on the public’s support of the courts irrespective of the decisions they make (“diffuse support”), and by research that provides reason to fear that the distinction between diffuse support and support depending on those decisions (“specific support”) will disappear, leading people to ask of the judiciary not, “What does the law require?,” but rather, “What have you done for me lately?” I then turn to how, in the conduct of interbranch relations, the judiciary should respond to the impulses and incentives, both legitimate and illegitimate, that have brought us to this unhappy point. I conclude that successful interbranch relations require the institutional judiciary to avoid the attitudes and techniques of contemporary politics, but not to avoid politics, and that the main challenge in that regard is to avoid the perception that the federal judiciary is just another interest group. Finally, using the writings and career of the late Richard Arnold to exemplify what is needed in the politics of judging as well as the politics of the judiciary, I argue for judges to provide leadership in a return to norms of custom, dialogue, and statesmanship in interbranch relations. In order to do so, more federal judges will need to follow Arnold’s example in recognizing that a presidential commission does not confer moral superiority; that judicial accountability, properly conceived, is essential for judicial independence; and that both “posterity worship” (the attempt to control the future) and institutional aggrandizement are inimical to the long-term interests of the federal courts and the federal judiciary." @default.
• W3121693565 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3121693565 creator A5025441533 @default.
• W3121693565 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W3121693565 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W3121693565 title "Judicial independence, judicial accountability & interbranch relations" @default.
• W3121693565 cites W1977224857 @default.
• W3121693565 cites W2088269835 @default.
• W3121693565 cites W2095819951 @default.
• W3121693565 cites W2107807372 @default.
• W3121693565 doi "https://doi.org/10.1162/daed.2008.137.4.16" @default.
• W3121693565 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W3121693565 type Work @default.
• W3121693565 sameAs 3121693565 @default.
• W3121693565 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3121693565 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3121693565 hasAuthorship W3121693565A5025441533 @default.
• W3121693565 hasBestOaLocation W31216935651 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C171460291 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C35651441 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C48764862 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C79638320 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C81819989 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C105795698 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C144024400 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C171460291 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C17744445 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C190253527 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C199539241 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C2776007630 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C33923547 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C35651441 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C48764862 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C79638320 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C81819989 @default.
• W3121693565 hasConceptScore W3121693565C94625758 @default.
• W3121693565 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3121693565 hasLocation W31216935651 @default.
• W3121693565 hasOpenAccess W3121693565 @default.
• W3121693565 hasPrimaryLocation W31216935651 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W1495690548 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W1597310574 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W1991744520 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W2316945757 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W2379669826 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W2474640988 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W2905144162 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W4238568649 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W4238698064 @default.
• W3121693565 hasRelatedWork W837477761 @default.
• W3121693565 hasVolume "137" @default.
• W3121693565 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3121693565 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3121693565 magId "3121693565" @default.
• W3121693565 workType "article" @default.