Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3121767342> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 98 of
98
with 100 items per page.
- W3121767342 endingPage "336" @default.
- W3121767342 startingPage "336" @default.
- W3121767342 abstract "During the novel coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, telehealth has become a vital component of health care delivery. For otolaryngology evaluations, examination of the ear and oropharynx is important but difficult to achieve remotely.To assess the feasibility of patient use of low-cost digital videoscopes and smartphones for examination of the ear and oropharynx.A prospective quality improvement study was conducted in an academic adult otolaryngology clinic including 23 patients who presented for an in-person appointment and owned a smartphone device. The study was conducted from July 1 to 15, 2020.Participants were asked to capture pictures and videos of their ear canals and oropharynx with digital videoscopes and their smartphones under real-time guidance over a telehealth platform. They were then surveyed about their experience.The primary outcomes were ratings by health care clinicians and a blinded otolaryngologist reviewer of image acceptability. Secondary outcomes included participant time to image acquisition and willingness to purchase digital videoscopes for telehealth use.Of the 23 participants included, 14 were women (61%); mean age was 50 years (range, 21 to 80 years). Of the images obtained using the digital otoscope ear examination, 95% were considered acceptable by the health care clinicians and 91% were considered acceptable by the blinded reviewer; 16 participants (70%) reported that the otoscope was easy to use. The mean time to acquire images for both ears was 114 seconds (95% CI, 84-145 seconds). Twenty-one participants (91%) were willing to pay for a digital otoscope for telehealth use. For the oropharyngeal examination, a greater proportion of smartphone video examinations were considered acceptable by clinicians (63% acceptability) and the blinded reviewer (55%) compared with the digital endoscope (clinicians, 40%; blinded reviewer, 14%). The mean time required for the oropharyngeal examination smartphone video capture was shorter at 35 seconds compared with both the digital endoscope (difference, -27 seconds; 95% CI, -7 to -47 seconds) and smartphone photo capture (difference, -53 seconds; 95% CI, -20 to -87 seconds).Digital otoscopes and smartphones apparently can facilitate remote head and neck physical examination in telehealth. Digital otoscopes were useful for ear examinations, and smartphone videos appeared to be the most useful for oropharyngeal examinations. Further studies are required to determine specific diagnostic capabilities in various telehealth practice settings." @default.
- W3121767342 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5012228351 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5012368819 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5033231789 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5039124280 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5065611856 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5070704493 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5075090706 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5075891824 @default.
- W3121767342 creator A5076810122 @default.
- W3121767342 date "2021-04-01" @default.
- W3121767342 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
- W3121767342 title "Patient Use of Low-cost Digital Videoscopes and Smartphones for Remote Ear and Oropharyngeal Examinations" @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2014129035 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2022110432 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2176043171 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2782732167 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2788955048 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2891633177 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2899353011 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2902513808 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W2984287652 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3012867801 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3019570274 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3023041318 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3024629440 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3031655386 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3034157726 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W3035239279 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W4243552046 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W4248818532 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W4249104814 @default.
- W3121767342 cites W4292528167 @default.
- W3121767342 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.5223" @default.
- W3121767342 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7821089" @default.
- W3121767342 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33475683" @default.
- W3121767342 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
- W3121767342 type Work @default.
- W3121767342 sameAs 3121767342 @default.
- W3121767342 citedByCount "14" @default.
- W3121767342 countsByYear W31217673422021 @default.
- W3121767342 countsByYear W31217673422022 @default.
- W3121767342 countsByYear W31217673422023 @default.
- W3121767342 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5012228351 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5012368819 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5033231789 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5039124280 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5065611856 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5070704493 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5075090706 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5075891824 @default.
- W3121767342 hasAuthorship W3121767342A5076810122 @default.
- W3121767342 hasBestOaLocation W31217673421 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C108516343 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C2779891985 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C2780433410 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C2781050511 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C108516343 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C141071460 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C160735492 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C162324750 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C1862650 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C2779891985 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C2780433410 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C2781050511 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C50522688 @default.
- W3121767342 hasConceptScore W3121767342C71924100 @default.
- W3121767342 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3121767342 hasLocation W31217673421 @default.
- W3121767342 hasLocation W31217673422 @default.
- W3121767342 hasLocation W31217673423 @default.
- W3121767342 hasOpenAccess W3121767342 @default.
- W3121767342 hasPrimaryLocation W31217673421 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W2648938483 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W2923364978 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W3031136078 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W3182311274 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W3202742903 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W4220890319 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W4281653088 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W4292875897 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W4311339585 @default.
- W3121767342 hasRelatedWork W4362720409 @default.
- W3121767342 hasVolume "147" @default.
- W3121767342 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3121767342 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3121767342 magId "3121767342" @default.
- W3121767342 workType "article" @default.