FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3121825661> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3121825661 startingPage "77" @default.
• W3121825661 abstract "Abstract**: The question of administrative governance in European Union reflects links between decision-making process and national Member States. The Permanent Representations are key institutions translating Brussels policies into national sphere. This article contradicts constructivist/Europeanization arguments for thick socialization of permanent representatives and focuses on Romania and Bulgaria, in institutional medium of Political and Security Committee. The author claims that adaptation - thin socialization - of permanent representatives can be measured differently, within a theoretical framework based on intergovernmentalism, institutionalism and Brusselization. Specific for Bulgarian representatives is their slow pace in acquiring formal and informal procedures of committee, while Romanian diplomats have a different relation with their Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Both countries are similar in terms of networking and their logic is driven by national interests. It is important to look at these countries as a potential model of comparison between Member States, in how they integrate in multi-level diplomatic layers in Brussels. Keywords: Permanent Representations, Political and Security Committee, intergovernmentalism, institutionalism, Brusselization, Romania, Bulgaria In 2002 European Council officially started negotiations to welcome Romania and Bulgaria to European Union. The accession treaty for both countries was signed in April 2005, establishing as membership date 1 January 2007. Nevertheless, there were many critics of accession of two. For example, in an article symbolically titled Two new entrants into EU, Romania and Bulgaria were seen as the new kids on block, characterized by economic and political backwardness (The Economist, January 2007), a view expressed a typical and generally negative opinion on two new members. In terms of foreign policy after 1989, two post-communist countries have had quite a similar course. EU has been a major objective in terms of foreign policy. Their foreign policy discourses, both before and after 2007, were based on idea of returning and integrating into Europe. Thus, NATO membership and EU accession seen as a major breakthrough, in sense of getting back on tracks of history, for first time after 1989 revolutions. The multitude of theories explaining accession process of new Member States has scarcely touched upon question of administrative governance. This is an important question in terms of how inside decision-making process of EU takes place. Moreover, lack of individual studies which address question of how new member states have integrated in EU institutional medium accounts for an actual literature gap. Therefore, this article seeks to bring in new theoretical perspectives and to facilitate a theory-based explanation- on one hand, more generally, of EU's administrative governance, and, on other hand, more specifically, of Council working groups such as Political and Security Committee (PSC), in relation to Permanent Representations of newest members, Bulgaria and Romania. It is important to permanently link EU literature with possible effects of enlargement over inner institutional changes. Therefore, it is extremely puzzling that branch of European Studies that looks at administrative governance has not examined so far accommodation of new Member States in Council framework. In this light, aim of present research is (1) to link theoretical framework drawn in first chapter with institutional environment of Council of European Union, especially Political and Security Committee (PSC), in relation to Romania and Bulgaria; (2) to criticize concept of socialization used mainly by constructivist/Europeanization scholars such as Jeffrey Checkel, as a central explanation for adaptation of Permanent Representatives, and to advance a theoretical and research scheme based on a combination of intergovernmentalism, institutionalism and Brusselization; (3) to reveal adaptation/socialization profiles of Romania and Bulgaria, inside PSC. …" @default.
• W3121825661 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3121825661 creator A5027658297 @default.
• W3121825661 date "2010-03-01" @default.
• W3121825661 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W3121825661 title "Between Hammers and Anvils the Socialization of European Permanent Representatives: Romania and Bulgaria - a Comparative Case Study" @default.
• W3121825661 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W3121825661 type Work @default.
• W3121825661 sameAs 3121825661 @default.
• W3121825661 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3121825661 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3121825661 hasAuthorship W3121825661A5027658297 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C190974861 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C2776503585 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C2776824162 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C138921699 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C144024400 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C155202549 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C162324750 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C17744445 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C190974861 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C199539241 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C2776503585 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C2776824162 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C2910001868 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C3116431 @default.
• W3121825661 hasConceptScore W3121825661C94625758 @default.
• W3121825661 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3121825661 hasLocation W31218256611 @default.
• W3121825661 hasOpenAccess W3121825661 @default.
• W3121825661 hasPrimaryLocation W31218256611 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W1544961269 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W1557056550 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W181353968 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W18476464 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W1933317196 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W1986501728 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2004334984 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2131615099 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2187311292 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2218222754 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2245626240 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W236711202 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2399010422 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W2876592017 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W3126705081 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W3159241738 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W341572675 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W613950411 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W757607565 @default.
• W3121825661 hasRelatedWork W3125241987 @default.
• W3121825661 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W3121825661 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3121825661 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3121825661 magId "3121825661" @default.
• W3121825661 workType "article" @default.