Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122021404> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W3122021404 startingPage "201" @default.
- W3122021404 abstract "In the absence of federal mandates, data breach litigation should help to establish data security standards to guide corporations and reassure consumers. Regrettably, too many consumers who bring these claims are denied standing under the injury-in-fact requirement before those claims can proceed to the merits. Relatedly, the Supreme Court affirmed the “certainly impending” standard for satisfying the injury-in-fact element of standing on the basis of an increased risk of future harm in a 2013 data collection case, Clapper v. Amnesty International. Since Clapper, much of the disagreement among federal courts in data breach litigation has concerned the requisite imminence of identity theft that a consumer’s allegations must demonstrate in order for the consumer to establish injury. However, Clapper should be inapposite in these cases because the Court has only applied the exacting injury inquiry that it applied in Clapper to other causes of action that present separation of powers concerns. More broadly, the application of the injury-in-fact requirement in data breach litigation forces courts to make at least two normative choices that lead to doctrinal unpredictability. In applying the factual injury test, courts enjoy discretion to identify the factual harm at issue and determine the minimum degree of risk necessary to render that harm “imminent.” Imposing either of these choices allows courts to dismiss claims on jurisdictional grounds that may well be compensable under substantive law. Moreover, this result is irreconcilable with the Court’s modern theoretical justification for the injury-in-fact requirement as a restraint on the unconstitutional expansion of judicial power. Courts could reduce doctrinal confusion in data breach litigation and thus encourage more predictable outcomes by remedying either of these two normative choices: selecting the factual injury or determining the minimum probability of that injury’s occurrence necessary to render that harm imminent." @default.
- W3122021404 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3122021404 creator A5019309569 @default.
- W3122021404 date "2016-12-31" @default.
- W3122021404 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
- W3122021404 title "Uncertain Standing: Normative Applications of Standing Doctrine Produce Unpredictable Jurisdictional Bars to Common Law Data Breach Claims" @default.
- W3122021404 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W3122021404 type Work @default.
- W3122021404 sameAs 3122021404 @default.
- W3122021404 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3122021404 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3122021404 hasAuthorship W3122021404A5019309569 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C165609540 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C2779412353 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C2780461701 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C144133560 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C162324750 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C165609540 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C17744445 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C190253527 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C199539241 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C2777363581 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C2777632292 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C2778272461 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C2779412353 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C2780461701 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C38652104 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C41008148 @default.
- W3122021404 hasConceptScore W3122021404C44725695 @default.
- W3122021404 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W3122021404 hasLocation W31220214041 @default.
- W3122021404 hasOpenAccess W3122021404 @default.
- W3122021404 hasPrimaryLocation W31220214041 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W1602509541 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W1844686522 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W21210502 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W2223687006 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W2435881781 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W2583237626 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W2749985767 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W282093997 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W2890404424 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3121272391 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3121538483 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3122563819 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3124137948 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3124739865 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3124986777 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3125205897 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3125521425 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3125670408 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W3125792181 @default.
- W3122021404 hasRelatedWork W331793995 @default.
- W3122021404 hasVolume "95" @default.
- W3122021404 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3122021404 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3122021404 magId "3122021404" @default.
- W3122021404 workType "article" @default.