FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122042016> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3122042016 endingPage "186" @default.
• W3122042016 startingPage "165" @default.
• W3122042016 abstract "The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological approach to assess the infrastructure potential of the territory as a tool for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of the state regional policy in the field of infrastructure development. The algorithm for comparative assessment of the infrastructure potential of regions is substantiated in the article. The authors believe that a regular assessment of the level of infrastructure development (infrastructure capacity) of macro-regions and regions – subjects of the Russian Federation, along with the monitoring of the achievement of the targets established, should be provided within the framework of implementation approved at the Federal and regional levels, of programmes and plans for infrastructure development. The proposed method of cost estimation of the region’s infrastructure potential is based on the use of an integral indicator of the territory’s fund saturation, taking into account the qualitative characteristics of the state of fixed assets. The study revealed a significant spatial differentiation of Russian regions in terms of infrastructure potential that helped to group them by the level of its development. The difference between the maximum and minimum values of the infrastructure potential assessment (even without taking into account the federal cities) exceeds 730 times. The cities of federal significance – Moscow, St. Petersburg, Sevastopol, as well as the republics of Crimea and Tatarstan, Krasnodar, Moscow and Kaliningrad regions have the maximum infrastructure potential. The infrastructure potential is evenly decreasing to the East and North of the country. The republics of Tyva, Sakha (Yakutia), Magadan region, and the Chukotka Autonomous Region have the lowest indicators of territory’s fund saturation and correspondingly low level of infrastructure potential development. More than a quarter of all Russian regions have a lower level of infrastructure development than the national average. Based on the correlation analysis, it was found that the size of the territory’s infrastructure potential has a direct positive impact on the inflow of investments to the regions and the growth of GRP, and therefore is one of the important factors of economic growth and increasing the competitiveness of the regional economy. The results obtained within the study can be applied in the practice of managing the development of territories when forecasting and developing strategies of the socioeconomic development of new macro-regions of Russia, and also used for monitoring the state policy of infrastructure development." @default.
• W3122042016 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3122042016 creator A5047223998 @default.
• W3122042016 creator A5069999493 @default.
• W3122042016 date "2020-01-01" @default.
• W3122042016 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3122042016 title "INFRASTRUCTURE POTENTIAL OF RUSSIAN REGIONS AS A FACTOR OF SUSTAINABLE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT" @default.
• W3122042016 doi "https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2020-0-3-165-186" @default.
• W3122042016 hasPublicationYear "2020" @default.
• W3122042016 type Work @default.
• W3122042016 sameAs 3122042016 @default.
• W3122042016 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W3122042016 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3122042016 hasAuthorship W3122042016A5047223998 @default.
• W3122042016 hasAuthorship W3122042016A5069999493 @default.
• W3122042016 hasBestOaLocation W31220420161 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C105639569 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C148383697 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C22212356 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C2985109136 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C3019616415 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C3019953208 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C552854447 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C105639569 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C127413603 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C144133560 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C148383697 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C17744445 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C199539241 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C205649164 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C22212356 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C2985109136 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C3019616415 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C3019953208 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C552854447 @default.
• W3122042016 hasConceptScore W3122042016C91375879 @default.
• W3122042016 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W3122042016 hasLocation W31220420161 @default.
• W3122042016 hasOpenAccess W3122042016 @default.
• W3122042016 hasPrimaryLocation W31220420161 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3093269762 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3122042016 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3130669542 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3164019942 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3176689047 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3192296122 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W3205420942 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W4220883924 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W4309198699 @default.
• W3122042016 hasRelatedWork W4320084310 @default.
• W3122042016 hasVolume "0" @default.
• W3122042016 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3122042016 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3122042016 magId "3122042016" @default.
• W3122042016 workType "article" @default.