Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122362854> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 68 of
68
with 100 items per page.
- W3122362854 abstract "The English-language literature of technological change is one of the few areas of economic writing in which Joseph Schumpeter has maintained a following and in which he has been accorded some modicum of the attention he deserves. There has grown up within this literature a standard interpretation of Schumpeter's famous assertion that progress will eventually come to be 'mechanized'. The conventional wisdom goes something like this. The argument in Schumpeter's early writings by which writers invariably mean the 1934 English translation of The Theory of Economic Development -- is really quite different from that in Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. There are, in effect, two Schumpeters: an 'early' Schumpeter and a 'later' Schumpeter. It was the former who believed in the importance of bold entrepreneurs, while the latter envisaged their demise and replacement by a bureaucratized mode of economic organization. Moreover, the reason Schumpeter changed his views is that he was reacting to the historical development of capitalism as he saw it taking place around him. As he moved from the world of owner-managed firms in early twentieth-century Europe to the world of large American corporations in the 1930s and 1940s, his opinions changed appropriately. The paper attempts to make two points. The first is that, as a doctrinal matter, the 'two Schumpeters' thesis, as it is understood in the Anglo-American literature on technological change, is clearly wrong. Equally wrong is the idea that the fundamentals of Schumpeter's thought on entrepreneurship were influenced importantly by any observation of large firms in the United States after 1931. Schumpeter's ideas were remarkably consistent from at least 1926 (five years before he came to the U. S.) until his death. The obsolescence thesis speaks to a distinction between early capitalism and later capitalism, perhaps, but not to an earlier and later Schumpeter. The second, and more important, point is that the obsolescence thesis is wrong. It rests on a confusion -- or perhaps a bait-and-switch -- between two quite different kinds of economic knowledge." @default.
- W3122362854 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3122362854 creator A5039040589 @default.
- W3122362854 date "2003-01-01" @default.
- W3122362854 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W3122362854 title "Schumpeter and the Obsolescence of the Entrepreneur" @default.
- W3122362854 cites W2089369468 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W2116006659 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W2118801262 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W2168748479 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W2592727096 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W3000801162 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W3124574502 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W3126055993 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W4235903336 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W4239546201 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W4241066883 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W4243910971 @default.
- W3122362854 cites W4250081328 @default.
- W3122362854 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.353280" @default.
- W3122362854 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
- W3122362854 type Work @default.
- W3122362854 sameAs 3122362854 @default.
- W3122362854 citedByCount "34" @default.
- W3122362854 countsByYear W31223628542012 @default.
- W3122362854 countsByYear W31223628542013 @default.
- W3122362854 countsByYear W31223628542014 @default.
- W3122362854 countsByYear W31223628542015 @default.
- W3122362854 countsByYear W31223628542016 @default.
- W3122362854 countsByYear W31223628542020 @default.
- W3122362854 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3122362854 hasAuthorship W3122362854A5039040589 @default.
- W3122362854 hasBestOaLocation W31223628542 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C133425853 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C30795975 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C40700 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConcept C84309077 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C10138342 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C133425853 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C144133560 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C162324750 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C162853370 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C30795975 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C40700 @default.
- W3122362854 hasConceptScore W3122362854C84309077 @default.
- W3122362854 hasLocation W31223628541 @default.
- W3122362854 hasLocation W31223628542 @default.
- W3122362854 hasLocation W31223628543 @default.
- W3122362854 hasOpenAccess W3122362854 @default.
- W3122362854 hasPrimaryLocation W31223628541 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W1831672836 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W1978505276 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W1988022704 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W1996465410 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W2004704580 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W2315047336 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W2902979924 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W3132716659 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W4206036160 @default.
- W3122362854 hasRelatedWork W607533090 @default.
- W3122362854 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3122362854 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3122362854 magId "3122362854" @default.
- W3122362854 workType "article" @default.