FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122447303> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3122447303 endingPage "44" @default.
• W3122447303 startingPage "16" @default.
• W3122447303 abstract "The award of every judicial remedy, whether in the nature of declaration, coercion, compensation, restitution or punishment, can be said, in general terms, to vindicate the legal rights of the plaintiff. At the same time, remedies awarded in civil actions sometimes serve a more pronounced vindicatory purpose, particularly where the action is to protect important rights and dignitary interests. Despite frequent references to vindication in defamation and trespass cases, there is much uncertainty about the role of vindication in an award of damages. In recent times, a growing interest in the remedial role of vindication can be detected. This article aims to bring greater clarity to use of the word vindication in the law of remedies, to develop a framework for understanding the vindicatory role of remedies and to explore the role that vindication plays in tort damages. To do this, the following questions will be examined. First, what does vindication mean? Secondly, what does it mean to attribute a vindicatory purpose to a remedy? Thirdly, in what way and to what extent do tort damages achieve a vindicatory purpose? Fourthly, are there torts that by their nature require vindication as a distinct remedial purpose? (2009) 17 Tort L Rev 16 Introduction Introduction Nature of the issue and aims of the article Nature of the issue and aims of the article Judicial proceedings provide the means for enforcing legal rights in a civil society. The many reasons for which parties bring legal proceedings include vindication of rights, enforcement of duties and to obtain remedies for wrongdoing. [1] The language of vindication is intimately linked with rights-based conceptions of legal entitlements and legal wrongs. The award of every judicial remedy, whether in the nature of declaration, coercion, compensation, restitution or punishment, can be said, in general terms, to vindicate the legal rights of the plaintiff. [2] At the same time, remedies awarded in civil actions sometimes serve a more pronounced vindicatory purpose, particularly where the action is to protect important rights [3] and dignitary interests. Reference by the courts to the vindicatory nature of remedies is not new – vindication has long been referred to as an important aspect of awarding damages for defamation and trespass. Frequent references to vindication in these cases have not, however, led to clarity or consistency in the role that is assigned to vindication in an award of damages. It is also an aspect of the law of damages that has received little academic attention. Despite this, a growing interest in the remedial role of vindication can be detected in recent times. As an emerging area of inquiry, there are many issues surrounding the clarification and potential expansion of the role of vindication. This article aims to bring greater clarity (2009) 17 Tort L Rev 16 at 17 to use of the word vindication in the law of remedies, to develop a framework for understanding the vindicatory role of remedies and to explore the role that vindication plays in tort damages. To do this, the following questions will be examined. First, what does vindication mean? Secondly, what does it mean to attribute a vindicatory purpose to a remedy? Thirdly, in what way and to what extent do tort damages achieve a vindicatory purpose? Fourthly, are there torts that by their nature require vindication as a distinct remedial purpose? The first and second questions are addressed in this part of the article, though further insight into the meaning of vindication is gained in the following two parts. A distinction is drawn between the vindicatory effect of a remedy and its vindicatory purpose. A further distinction between vindication as a primary and as a secondary purpose of awarding any particular remedy is introduced in order to assist the analysis of the relationship between compensatory, aggravated, gain-based and exemplary damages, and vindication. 17 Tort L Rev 16 Wednesday, 20 November, 2013 at 13:14 EST Page 1" @default.
• W3122447303 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3122447303 creator A5001616313 @default.
• W3122447303 creator A5026620729 @default.
• W3122447303 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W3122447303 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3122447303 title "The Role of Vindication in Tort Damages" @default.
• W3122447303 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W3122447303 type Work @default.
• W3122447303 sameAs 3122447303 @default.
• W3122447303 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W3122447303 countsByYear W31224473032013 @default.
• W3122447303 countsByYear W31224473032014 @default.
• W3122447303 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3122447303 hasAuthorship W3122447303A5001616313 @default.
• W3122447303 hasAuthorship W3122447303A5026620729 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C200635333 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C2776463841 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C2776515129 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C2777381055 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C2777834853 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C2777930997 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C83645499 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConcept C97460637 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C144024400 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C17744445 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C190253527 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C199539241 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C200635333 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C2776463841 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C2776515129 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C2777381055 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C2777834853 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C2777930997 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C83645499 @default.
• W3122447303 hasConceptScore W3122447303C97460637 @default.
• W3122447303 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3122447303 hasLocation W31224473031 @default.
• W3122447303 hasOpenAccess W3122447303 @default.
• W3122447303 hasPrimaryLocation W31224473031 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W1489055912 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W1493662911 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2052729844 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2144870544 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2248313797 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2670426637 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2805902879 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2906594551 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2912781690 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W2943251868 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3121340258 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3121352111 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3122916149 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3124985197 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3126766115 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3162052383 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W343752295 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W575574195 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W74628548 @default.
• W3122447303 hasRelatedWork W3122619767 @default.
• W3122447303 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W3122447303 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3122447303 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3122447303 magId "3122447303" @default.
• W3122447303 workType "article" @default.