FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122653669> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3122653669 endingPage "546" @default.
• W3122653669 startingPage "515" @default.
• W3122653669 abstract "Evolutionary theories have always been treated by legal scholars as a sort of cousin to the legal theoretical family, both in Europe and the United States. They are nice theories, they tell interesting stories, you sometimes listen to what they have to say and when among friends, you may even quote them. However, in the modern mononuclear family, when it is time to tackle important issues and reach important decisions, or simply to celebrate some success stories, these cousins are often left outside the door, being simply “relatives” and not part of the legal family in the proper sense. A former evolutionary scholar strikingly stated in a manner that can be seen as representative of the general skepticism towards the evolutionary approach of a large segment of the legal family, “Legal scholarship should not be so timid as to depend on others for its theoretical models. We might take our inspiration where we find it, but we should build our theories within our own discipline, constrained only by the data that defines it and the criteria of quality appropriate to it.” The main objective of this article is to take the first step towards making evolutionary theory “our own discipline,” by elevating evolutionary theory from the status of “cousin” to one of “sibling” (or at least “in-laws”) of the legal family. The focus in particular is to understand why, despite the fact that the evolutionary theory approach to law (or “evolutionary theory and law”) has been present quite a while in the legal scholar's discussion, the legal world at large has left it at the front step of the legal house. Based on this analysis, the task is also to evaluate whether it is possible, after certain adjustments, to invite evolutionary theory into the larger family of legal thinking, in particular as part of the legal theories of law-making (as “legal evolutionary theory”)." @default.
• W3122653669 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3122653669 creator A5043576958 @default.
• W3122653669 date "2008-04-01" @default.
• W3122653669 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W3122653669 title "From “Evolutionary Theory and Law” to a “Legal Evolutionary Theory”" @default.
• W3122653669 cites W1539132565 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W1914024486 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W1975764564 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2025084879 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2059375812 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2089973665 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2146769087 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2297683331 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2322923579 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2478371252 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2795777543 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2796595379 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2889796974 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W2939788931 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W3124180016 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W4235269836 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W4238016416 @default.
• W3122653669 cites W4251425481 @default.
• W3122653669 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200006568" @default.
• W3122653669 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W3122653669 type Work @default.
• W3122653669 sameAs 3122653669 @default.
• W3122653669 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W3122653669 countsByYear W31226536692015 @default.
• W3122653669 countsByYear W31226536692017 @default.
• W3122653669 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3122653669 hasAuthorship W3122653669A5043576958 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C18296254 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConcept C2989147100 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C111472728 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C138885662 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C144024400 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C17744445 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C18296254 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C199539241 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C2778061430 @default.
• W3122653669 hasConceptScore W3122653669C2989147100 @default.
• W3122653669 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W3122653669 hasLocation W31226536691 @default.
• W3122653669 hasOpenAccess W3122653669 @default.
• W3122653669 hasPrimaryLocation W31226536691 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W1530240725 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W1582507520 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W1982599188 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2116704197 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2215824325 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2284105538 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2318600460 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2323915269 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2333405073 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2401776374 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2424324741 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2765119755 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2796162601 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2900332236 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W2912103082 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W3122630778 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W3125225058 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W391989991 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W52764175 @default.
• W3122653669 hasRelatedWork W610052820 @default.
• W3122653669 hasVolume "9" @default.
• W3122653669 isParatext "false" @default.
• W3122653669 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W3122653669 magId "3122653669" @default.
• W3122653669 workType "article" @default.