Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122664204> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 66 of
66
with 100 items per page.
- W3122664204 startingPage "1035" @default.
- W3122664204 abstract "Consider a type of argument that is familiar in legal scholarship, such a commonplace in fact that its structure may lurk unnoticed in the background by the reader. The argument proceeds like this: (1) Here is some legal doctrine or rule; (2) courts and scholars (or at least my rivals) tend to think that its point, rationale, purpose, or function is X—that is, the doctrine is “all about” X; (3) but I think they’re mistaken, and the doctrine is really “all about” Y; (4) here is some evidence supporting my claim; (5) therefore, we should understand the point of this rule or doctrine as Y. As an example of this pattern of argument, take a recent paper on the consideration doctrine in contract law. In a classic article, Lon Fuller argued that the consideration doctrine aims to accomplish three purposes: to provide evidence that a contract was entered into, to slow down the contracting parties and cause them to memorialize carefully the terms of their agreement, and most importantly to channel the interactions of parties into legally effective transactional forms.1 Two modern authors claim, however, that the consideration doctrine “lack[s] a sound theoretical justification.”2 Under this argument, received wisdom among contracts scholars is mistaken; the distinction between promises that will be enforceable without consideration and those that are legally unenforceable should actually be understood as a way to make anticommodification norms more robust. That is, treating certain kinds of promises as market transactions violates social taboos.3 The consideration doctrine therefore should be understood in terms of the value of anticommodification, in the sense that requiring consideration for certain" @default.
- W3122664204 created "2021-02-01" @default.
- W3122664204 creator A5007618056 @default.
- W3122664204 date "2011-01-01" @default.
- W3122664204 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W3122664204 title "Explanation in Legal Scholarship: The Inferential Structure of Doctrinal Legal Analysis" @default.
- W3122664204 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
- W3122664204 type Work @default.
- W3122664204 sameAs 3122664204 @default.
- W3122664204 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W3122664204 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W3122664204 hasAuthorship W3122664204A5007618056 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C2778061430 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C2778890055 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C138885662 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C144024400 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C162324750 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C17744445 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C185592680 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C190253527 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C199539241 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C2776211767 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C2778061430 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C2778890055 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C55493867 @default.
- W3122664204 hasConceptScore W3122664204C98184364 @default.
- W3122664204 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W3122664204 hasLocation W31226642041 @default.
- W3122664204 hasOpenAccess W3122664204 @default.
- W3122664204 hasPrimaryLocation W31226642041 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W1509660139 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W1531195143 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W153917252 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W1910462260 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W1982786921 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2142954222 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2256262746 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2266169145 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2267290751 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2271817646 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2519078447 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W3038768791 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W304861907 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W3121848717 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W3125583048 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W3145837056 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W321381592 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W208385589 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W2142940207 @default.
- W3122664204 hasRelatedWork W3125690635 @default.
- W3122664204 hasVolume "96" @default.
- W3122664204 isParatext "false" @default.
- W3122664204 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W3122664204 magId "3122664204" @default.
- W3122664204 workType "article" @default.