FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W3122760400> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W3122760400 abstract "Abstract Background Due to complex morphology and limited access, the cleaning of the furcation area is extremely challenging. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches need to be tested to potentially overcome debridement limitations. The aim of the present prospective 12-month study was to compare clinical and microbiological effects following erythritol air-polishing versus conventional mechanical debridement of furcation defects in a cohort of periodontal maintenance patients. Methods Twenty patients with grade II mandibular molar furcation defects volunteered to enroll in this single-centre, examiner masked, randomized controlled trial. In a split-mouth study design, two furcation sites in each patient were randomly assigned to either receive subgingival debridement using erythritol air-polishing (test) or conventional ultrasonic/curette debridement (control) at baseline, and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Probing depth, clinical attachment level and bleeding on probing were recorded at 3-month intervals. Subgingival microbiological samples obtained at baseline, 6 and 12 months were analyzed using checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization. Discomfort from treatment was scored at 12 months using a visual analogue scale. The differences between treatments, and time-points, were tested using multilevel analysis (mixed effect models and robust variance estimates). Results A significant reduction in probing depth took place following both treatments ( p < 0.001). Control sites experienced a significant mean gain in clinical attachment level of 0.5 mm (± 0.2) ( p = 0.004), whereas a non-significant gain of 0.4 mm (± 0.3) was observed at test sites ( p = 0.119). At 6 months, a significant between-treatment difference of 0.8 mm (± 0.4) was observed in favor of the control ( p = 0.032). No significant between-treatment differences were observed in microbial load or composition. Notably, at 12 months patients experienced significantly less discomfort following air-polishing compared with control ( p = 0.001). Conclusions The 12-month observations indicate that erythritol air-polishing and conventional mechanical debridement both support clinical improvements. A significant between-treatment difference in clinical attachment level was, however, detected in favour of control debridement at 6 months. In terms of patient comfort, erythritol air-polishing is superior. Trial Registration : The clinical trial was retrospectively registered in ClinicalTrial.gov with registration NCT04493398 (07/28/2020)." @default.
• W3122760400 created "2021-02-01" @default.
• W3122760400 creator A5014329347 @default.
• W3122760400 creator A5047383571 @default.
• W3122760400 creator A5061138918 @default.
• W3122760400 creator A5072032815 @default.
• W3122760400 creator A5084183340 @default.
• W3122760400 creator A5087723925 @default.
• W3122760400 date "2021-01-21" @default.
• W3122760400 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W3122760400 title "A 12-month randomized controlled trial evaluating erythritol air-polishing versus curette/ultrasonic debridement of mandibular furcations in supportive periodontal therapy" @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1500324549 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1560766103 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1606346748 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1860358962 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1873307669 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1965755674 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1972917199 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1974854584 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1975031021 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W1979065634 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2000945677 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2014334558 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2021512434 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2027732320 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2027904923 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2038790587 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2040054832 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2054463585 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2062706655 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2063653505 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2065521690 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2075873328 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2077875722 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2080709576 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2083909147 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2084506086 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2098594679 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2113161361 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2117675059 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2120263268 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2123183272 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2126544020 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2127725376 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2137090978 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2157107389 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2174784305 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2180757076 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2195980900 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2222011912 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2596536990 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2606948157 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2794131146 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2896311176 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2934140274 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2964822565 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W2965633080 @default.
• W3122760400 cites W4247903468 @default.
• W3122760400 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01397-3" @default.
• W3122760400 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7819243" @default.
• W3122760400 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33478480" @default.
• W3122760400 hasPublicationYear "2021" @default.
• W3122760400 type Work @default.
• W3122760400 sameAs 3122760400 @default.
• W3122760400 citedByCount "10" @default.
• W3122760400 countsByYear W31227604002021 @default.
• W3122760400 countsByYear W31227604002022 @default.
• W3122760400 countsByYear W31227604002023 @default.
• W3122760400 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W3122760400 hasAuthorship W3122760400A5014329347 @default.
• W3122760400 hasAuthorship W3122760400A5047383571 @default.
• W3122760400 hasAuthorship W3122760400A5061138918 @default.
• W3122760400 hasAuthorship W3122760400A5072032815 @default.
• W3122760400 hasAuthorship W3122760400A5084183340 @default.
• W3122760400 hasAuthorship W3122760400A5087723925 @default.
• W3122760400 hasBestOaLocation W31227604001 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C2777438270 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C2777655690 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C2777750650 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C2777968807 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C2780385504 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C58747440 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C141071460 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C168563851 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C199343813 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C202271784 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C2777438270 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C2777655690 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C2777750650 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C2777968807 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C2780385504 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C58747440 @default.
• W3122760400 hasConceptScore W3122760400C71924100 @default.
• W3122760400 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W3122760400 hasLocation W31227604001 @default.

• next